Stock 1998 WS6 1/4mi results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2008, 09:36 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Not Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Stock 1998 WS6 1/4mi results

First time racing an automatic, you'd think it would be easy. My first run of the day I got a 13.4 @ 102mph with a 2.0 60'. I couldn't top that the rest of the day. Only mod is a Borla exhaust and air lid, so I still consider the car kinda stock.

When I launched I took it up to 1600rpms or so and floored it on green. I caught a bit of spin, but I tried easing into the gas on other runs and couldn't get a better time. 13.5 - 13.7 the rest of the day.
Old 09-02-2008, 08:30 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
cabech984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice run for a stock 98 Auto. Ive only ran a 13.59@104(2.17 60') in my stock 02 SS but its got a T56.
Old 09-02-2008, 08:36 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
streetassasin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

not bad mine only did in little better with the mods in sig
Old 09-03-2008, 11:47 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
AznMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Someplace Hot
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Good job. What was the DA? I trap the same, but have a HORRIBLE time. havn't gone since I added the gears, so next time I'm hoping I'll will do better.
Old 09-03-2008, 02:58 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Wtf???

Originally Posted by cabech984
Nice run for a stock 98 Auto. Ive only ran a 13.59@104(2.17 60') in my stock 02 SS but its got a T56.

yeah cause the 98's are so much slower...
Old 09-03-2008, 03:46 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
spec_j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
yeah cause the 98's are so much slower...
being an auto doesnt help you have to have a M6 to be fast .. but your number sare about what they should be. I went 13.6 @ 103 stock, and with a lid/filter/FRA/cutout/DR's i went 12.9
Old 09-03-2008, 05:53 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
tee-boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A 98 at 102mph in the heat. I wouldn't say that is bad.
Old 09-03-2008, 06:27 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Not Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah it was 90+ that day
Old 09-03-2008, 08:10 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not bad. My 01 ta m6 ran 13.4's 100% bone stock. with a lid,filter a 160 t-stat and better driving I got a 12.95. My buds 98 Z with a borla,lid and 3.73 a4 ran 12.92.
Old 09-04-2008, 07:32 AM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
streetassasin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

not bad at all for in mild bolt on car in 90+*
Old 09-04-2008, 08:25 AM
  #11  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good numbers! Does it have 3.23's? (did the auto WS6's come any other way?) I'd throw some drag radials on there and drop that 60'. You'll be in the 12's in better weather with the tires.
Old 09-04-2008, 03:33 PM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Not Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just wanted a base line pass so I can see improvements over the future thousands of dollars spent
Old 09-05-2008, 12:22 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Very good numbers keep up the good work!!!
Old 09-05-2008, 06:01 PM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
cabech984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
yeah cause the 98's are so much slower...
Lets see, my old 98 Formula A4 with
LS6 intake and SLP Lid
Pacesetter LT's, ORY and Catback
HP Tuning
MT Streets
Stock Stall Converter
weight reduction(Seats, A/C, sway bar, spare tire and jack)

ran a 13.3@106.xx on a 2.1 60'.

On the same day, my stock 2002 6 speed Camaro SS with
MT DR's
HP Tuning

ran a 13.39@105.1 on a 2.10 60'.

Granted, neither are slow, I just think stock for stock that the M6 is potentially better. That was olly my second time at the track with the T56 too. But nothing beats a stalled automatic IMO!!!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.