EHat911

iTrader: (15)

Does anyone know what the record is for the fasted stock cubic in 6.0 is?? ive tried looking for it but only seem to find the LS1 record which obviously isnt the same cubic inch

BlackScreaminMachine

iTrader: (17)

That will be a hard record to determine. As that no 4th GEN Fbody came with one, the only way would be to swap it. Since I assume you want to compare this against Fbodies!? Or perhaps just 2005 GTO's and C5 equipped Corvettes......

So anyways, at least with the 4th GEN crowd, anyone putting in a 6.0L LS2 block, often had it modified to a much larger displacement and certain was not a drop in.

Do they exsist? I am sure of it, is there a large enough pool to determine a record? I doubt it.

But I would like to see some guys post results with a drop in LS2 and maybe those keeping the bottom end stock.

Unfortunately I see your answer coming from GTO and Corvettes, not Fbodies.

ryarbrough

iTrader: (18)

I don't know about that one.... MM has been 8.5 with one in an F-body. Probably not the "record" but people are using the combo.

Seems like there's a record for everything though...

BlackScreaminMachine

iTrader: (17)

I hear you there, there I am sure even notable members that have, or are doing it. I guess when it comes down to records, how specific or broad do we want to be. I throw that there out as a thought peice.

In the end its dollars that dictate more often then not who has the record. If I wanted the stock LS1 bottom end record, whats to stop me putting it in a rail car chassis and going for the record, or a 25.5 spec Fbody chassis. If one had unlimited funds, whats to stop them for breaking every record, I guess its desire.

As people start to cry fowl then it really gets silly like....

I want the LS1 Bottom end record in a 2002 Firebird Trans Am NON Ws.6 6 speed, stock suspension, stock tire, w/ Navy Blue Met. Paint.....

I think the OP has a good idea as it is a viable motor but I think I see this type of post come up more often then not.

Demonicbird00

iTrader: (17)

i dont see the benefit of putting a stock ls2 in the car, its pretty much a waste of time and money.

im currently going w/ the ls2 block but its going to become a 400+ ci motor

the only other engines i can see putting in stock would be a ls3/7/9 whereas they have more cubes and a cam only or h/c setup can yield over 500rwhp

-brandon

BES Stroked Nova

iTrader: (24)

I get a good feeling when my "waste of time and money" stock short block 6.0L(iron block) puts a *** kicking on a stroker motor...

it made 6xx+ flywheel horsepower, and only has a mid 240's duration cam, so it drives rather nice too.

oh and it made 500+ at the tire, with a 4.88 geared 9" and 28" slicks, no dyno queen numbers.

Demonicbird00

iTrader: (17)

well i guess it all depends what your going for....

from my perspective, running my stock bottom end motor to 6800+ rpms for 5 years and then going and putting in another stock ls1/2/6 doing the same thing is a waste of time and money cause the bottom end "being stock" is on borrowed time.

so if your going to put another motor in its a good idea to build it, thats all im saying

fenton06

iTrader: (1)

The real question is - who cares? Asking about the record for "cam only", "stock bottom end", or "pink cars with 10.5's" and all other derivatives is just stupid.

BlackScreaminMachine

iTrader: (17)

I think a Stock Bottom End for a Engine that Was avalible for a Platform is very viable. And some other things like FI through the bottom end or nitrous, or even cam only. Since there is a good chance that there is a bigger pool of canidates, it make it's worth while.

To be really honest. IF I had nearly unlimited funds, lets say 100+ Million take home Lottery type winnings. I am going to be pretty bored and I can be spending tons of free time trying to beat records for the fun of it.

EHat911

iTrader: (15)

im not talking about a stock bottom end.... im talking about stock cubic inch.... there is a difference..

SSPerformance

iTrader: (76)

Depends on the color of your car.......lol

Demonicbird00

iTrader: (17)

so what your saying is you want to get a 6.0 and forge the bottom end and keep it stock cube?

ryarbrough

iTrader: (18)

Why not... No $ on a forged crank and, at least with a turbo car, it'll make damn near the same power as a larger engine.

EHat911

iTrader: (15)

yes that is what im saying and i was seeing if there was some sort record to more or less set just to see if i can get near it so i was seeing if there was a stock cubic in record i guess it just wasnt clear enought when i asked it

Demonicbird00

iTrader: (17)

ahh ok now i understand what you mean

Fireball

iTrader: (21)

I was "stock" cubic inch 6.0L. Just a .010 cleanup on the bores so it was a 366 vs a 364 and went 7.99 @ 177. Been as fast at 181mph.

EHat911

iTrader: (15)

im looking for N/A times, long story short im a student at sam racing and this is gunna be my student project motor and i need a goal to shot for.

Fireball

iTrader: (21)

then you should edit your first post saying thats what you were looking for

team39763

iTrader: (3)

Are you asking about f-body only ET's? I know DMizell was running some crazy fast ET's with a 6.0L stock bottom end...N/A. I think somewhere in the 9's, but it was in a mustang.

chrs1313

iTrader: (24)

few people have been 9.7-9.8s...one was with just milled 799 heads, no porting...

https://ls1tech.com/forums/single-di...-only-fox.html

I would just shoot for the 346 record by Texas speed 9.6...If they threw in a 6.0 I am sure they would be 9.5s all day...