Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fast 102 trap speeds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2013, 11:54 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
 
wilkes02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ft.Polk LA
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

need to go to a 102mmTB as well. I didn't think the 90mm i had would choke it that bad, but looking at the graph, yea it was real bad above 4.5k. just be ready to make that switch too.
Old 12-04-2013, 11:58 AM
  #22  
10 Second Fun Car
iTrader: (7)
 
jlrz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pearland, Tx
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I dynod with both the 90 and 102 tb. Saw 5 hp difference decided against it due to more tuning needed. I did however use the 102tb on the current motor.
Old 12-04-2013, 12:05 PM
  #23  
Staging Lane
 
wilkes02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ft.Polk LA
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlrz28
I dynod with both the 90 and 102 tb. Saw 5 hp difference decided against it due to more tuning needed. I did however use the 102tb on the current motor.
That's unusual. My 434(ls6) hates that 90mm Tb above 4.5k you can see it starving on the charts
Old 12-04-2013, 12:07 PM
  #24  
10 Second Fun Car
iTrader: (7)
 
jlrz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pearland, Tx
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The loss was seen with the 346. With 402 I went ahead and ran the 102 due to the increased ci
Old 12-04-2013, 12:17 PM
  #25  
Staging Lane
 
wilkes02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ft.Polk LA
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlrz28
The loss was seen with the 346. With 402 I went ahead and ran the 102 due to the increased ci
ok that makes a bit more sense i suppose. was it a NA 346? i think depending on the setup is wether it responds well to it. some do, and some don't.
Old 12-04-2013, 12:23 PM
  #26  
10 Second Fun Car
iTrader: (7)
 
jlrz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pearland, Tx
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yes it was a 346 NA. This was done at Patrick Gs dyno.
Old 12-11-2013, 04:35 PM
  #27  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Kingc8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,558
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Transam1
Ill go first i guess even though i wont have my 102 track passes till Sunday!

1. Full weight car
2. 347ci, 5200 converter, afr225's @59cc, 236/242 .615/.615 111LSA, 9" w. 4.11
3. Best trap was 91.5 MPH and 1.59 60' with the LS6 intake and stock TB in the 1/8 mile

Stay tuned.... 102 intake and 92mm TB are on and waiting. Going to retune at the track also, i doubt we make a pass with the old tune, but i guess i can for *****.
That's a pretty weak trap considering the mods. I trapped 91.1 with a F13, stock 853s and a ls6 intake with a 1.7 60ft.

I wonder why it's trapping that low? Have you had your trans built?
Old 12-11-2013, 04:41 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
John Deere racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Williamsport,in
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

346
Afr 225
Fast 102
102 tb
G6x3
470rwhp N/A
Thru mwc 9 and 4.56 gear

Ran
1.39 60ft
10.4
128mph
M6...of course

I think 1/8 mile was
101mph





I'm
Going to use a 102 on my new 370 ci set up
Hopeing to go 135mph with it ...N/A
M6 ... Of course

Last edited by John Deere racer; 12-11-2013 at 04:49 PM.



Quick Reply: Fast 102 trap speeds



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.