Spring rates
12-01-2004, 01:29 PM
#41
Explain your spring theory.
On the shocks you are claiming that the shock can control wheelstands just by tightening the shock???? I was just curious about this because since 1997 and my first wheelstand on these torque arm cars tightening the shock never killed the wheelstands. The only way controlled them was to limit travel AND run softer springs.
I'm always open for other theories.
On the shocks you are claiming that the shock can control wheelstands just by tightening the shock???? I was just curious about this because since 1997 and my first wheelstand on these torque arm cars tightening the shock never killed the wheelstands. The only way controlled them was to limit travel AND run softer springs.
I'm always open for other theories.
12-01-2004, 01:41 PM
#42
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hockeytown/MotorCity
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am no expert in physics or anything but, it does seem like a stiffer rear spring would help prevent wheel stands. The stiffer spring seems like it would take longer to compress allowing the car to get moving first. I would think a softer spring would allow quicker weight transfer and more room for the rear of the car to come down.
12-01-2004, 03:17 PM
#44
i am talking about the front suspension.
as far as the dampening of the front shocks/struts...i am talking about my mustang. my camaro doesnt make enough power to lift a wheel
...so if its different with fbodys for some reason...forgive me.
but my car on motor...with my koni's as loose as they will go...will pull the front tires off the ground about 1'. now when i spray the car, i adjust them as tight as possible, and if i run like that on motor, the front tires wont come off the ground at all....and when sprayed they come up about 1-2ft. if i were to spray the car with them all the way loose...the car would flip over backwards. so in my eyes...dampening "can" control wheelies to point.
as far as the dampening of the front shocks/struts...i am talking about my mustang. my camaro doesnt make enough power to lift a wheel
...so if its different with fbodys for some reason...forgive me. but my car on motor...with my koni's as loose as they will go...will pull the front tires off the ground about 1'. now when i spray the car, i adjust them as tight as possible, and if i run like that on motor, the front tires wont come off the ground at all....and when sprayed they come up about 1-2ft. if i were to spray the car with them all the way loose...the car would flip over backwards. so in my eyes...dampening "can" control wheelies to point.
12-01-2004, 03:19 PM
#45
Launching!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Elwood, IL
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MADMAN
The body does not squat. It tries to separate from the rearend.
12-02-2004, 01:47 PM
#47
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hockeytown/MotorCity
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you are saying if you have no problem hooking, just comng up to high go with a softer spring in the back?
And if you have traction issues a stiffer spring would help?
And if you have traction issues a stiffer spring would help?
12-02-2004, 01:53 PM
#48
Originally Posted by andy98Z
So you are saying if you have no problem hooking, just comng up to high go with a softer spring in the back?
And if you have traction issues a stiffer spring would help?
And if you have traction issues a stiffer spring would help?
12-13-2004, 01:22 PM
#50
8 Second Club
Does anyone have pictures or a list of parts use in setting up the upper mount for a 2.5 inch rear spring setup? This sounds like a great idea and if the upper mount can be adjusted up and down you could really fine tune the spring rate preload and ride height. If anyone has any info and or pictures on this I would be great full
12-13-2004, 02:01 PM
#52
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slow3hoe2
a soft spring and a hard spring have the same amount of stored energy when the car is at ride height.
Stored spring energy is the area under the curve if force vs compression is plotted. Since we are using linear springs...this curve is a triangle.
Since the force is constant (front vehicle weight), then
stored energy = front vehicle weight * spring compression / 2
spring compression for a softer spring will be higher since more compression is required to build force.
12-13-2004, 03:46 PM
#53
Originally Posted by Fireball
hmmm...I have to disagree...
Stored spring energy is the area under the curve if force vs compression is plotted. Since we are using linear springs...this curve is a triangle.
Since the force is constant (front vehicle weight), then
stored energy = front vehicle weight * spring compression / 2
spring compression for a softer spring will be higher since more compression is required to build force.
Stored spring energy is the area under the curve if force vs compression is plotted. Since we are using linear springs...this curve is a triangle.
Since the force is constant (front vehicle weight), then
stored energy = front vehicle weight * spring compression / 2
spring compression for a softer spring will be higher since more compression is required to build force.
i guess what i was saying is that at equal ride heights...both springs are holding up the same amount of weight...therefore they are exerting the same amount of pressure. the stiffer spring will lose pressure faster than the softer spring as they are extended.
12-13-2004, 04:03 PM
#55
Originally Posted by z28racerlt1
I think best idea is to call Madman. 
Ken
Ken
cuz according to madmans spring theory, ill put some 700 lb road race springs on my ls1 and make it flip over backwards on launches.
Last edited by slow3hoe2; 12-13-2004 at 04:14 PM.
12-13-2004, 04:27 PM
#56
Launching!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Elwood, IL
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slow3hoe2
yup...so he can tell ya how springs work opposite of the way they actually do.
cuz according to madmans spring theory, ill put some 700 lb road race springs on my ls1 and make it flip over backwards on launches.
cuz according to madmans spring theory, ill put some 700 lb road race springs on my ls1 and make it flip over backwards on launches.
ken
12-13-2004, 04:42 PM
#57
Heres a case in point. 1969 Nova with double adjustable coilover shocks in the front. Caltacs and leaf springs in the rear. We had a 450lbs spring on the front and the limiters backed all the way off. The car would 60 ft at a 1.35 and barely pick up the front wheels. At the track I changed the front springs to 500lbs and set the ride height the same. No other adjustments were done to the car. Now the car leaves with the front end 2 ft in the air and carries the tires out to about 50 ft. The car has run consistent 1.29-1.30 60fts.
If this theory of mine didnt work them why did the car change???????
If this theory of mine didnt work them why did the car change???????
12-13-2004, 05:01 PM
#59
Originally Posted by MADMAN
Heres a case in point. 1969 Nova with double adjustable coilover shocks in the front. Caltacs and leaf springs in the rear. We had a 450lbs spring on the front and the limiters backed all the way off. The car would 60 ft at a 1.35 and barely pick up the front wheels. At the track I changed the front springs to 500lbs and set the ride height the same. No other adjustments were done to the car. Now the car leaves with the front end 2 ft in the air and carries the tires out to about 50 ft. The car has run consistent 1.29-1.30 60fts.
If this theory of mine didnt work them why did the car change???????
If this theory of mine didnt work them why did the car change???????
I am not arguing about what works better on a particular car. my only point is that a softer spring will make a car wheelie more than a stiffer spring...with both cars dead hooking. that is just a fact. If both cars dead hook with either spring...the stiffer one will probably aid in the better et....but when you have a car thats limited in suspension and tire...compared to the amount of power it has....the softer spring will aid in lifting the front end.
im not mad at anybody or trying to put down anyones knowledge....the only reason i started posting on this subject was because i thought maybe i missed something...and i was not seeing what youre seeing.
12-13-2004, 06:10 PM
#60
Here's what my local Go-Fast guru told me-
Let's say you have to hold up 1000#
You have a 125# spring and a 250# spring
The 250# spring would compress 4" and the 125# spring would compress 8" for the
same ride height at the same length. correct?
When launching, the 1st inch the 250#spring would be holding up 750# and the
125#spring would be holding up 875#.
so at a 4"rise the 250# spring would be done and the 125# spring would still have
500# of spring left.
So with 500# of spring left,I would think it would do a bigger wheelie then with the
250# stiffer spring (all things being equal in the rear).
I kinda thought the whole purpose of 'Drag springs' was to transfer weight better
to the rear allowing you to hook/wheelie better.
That's why we don't run road race springs at the dragstrip.
Let's say you have to hold up 1000#
You have a 125# spring and a 250# spring
The 250# spring would compress 4" and the 125# spring would compress 8" for the
same ride height at the same length. correct?
When launching, the 1st inch the 250#spring would be holding up 750# and the
125#spring would be holding up 875#.
so at a 4"rise the 250# spring would be done and the 125# spring would still have
500# of spring left.
So with 500# of spring left,I would think it would do a bigger wheelie then with the
250# stiffer spring (all things being equal in the rear).
I kinda thought the whole purpose of 'Drag springs' was to transfer weight better
to the rear allowing you to hook/wheelie better.
That's why we don't run road race springs at the dragstrip.