LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion (https://ls1tech.com/forums/)
-   Drag Racing Tech (https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-tech-34/)
-   -   How much do v6 springs help with the launch? (https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-tech/317139-how-much-do-v6-springs-help-launch.html)

n2o 05-05-2005 08:54 AM

How much do v6 springs help with the launch?
 
I am looking to drop my 60' down some more. 1.70 on 16 in e.t. streets. I have hals in the front, no front swaybar, spohn ta, lca's with relocation brackets, and slp stb and phr.

WJ SOM SS 05-05-2005 11:35 PM

15" wheels and tires will help you more than V6 early 4th gen rear springs. The springs gave me .03 over my stockers...1.70 to 1.67. That's with 8.5" ET Drags and Vig 3200 w/3.23's....WJ

PRAY HRD 05-05-2005 11:49 PM


Originally Posted by WJ SOM SS
15" wheels and tires will help you more than V6 early 4th gen rear springs. The springs gave me .03 over my stockers...1.70 to 1.67. That's with 8.5" ET Drags and Vig 3200 w/3.23's....WJ


so is the .03 consistent or can it just be chocked up to a possible contribution to the new low but not definate? i've spoken with Jay Billingsley about this subject and he recommended staying with stock V8 springs. i didn't get into all the details about it, i just trust his knowledge and experience. but, someone else can chime in if they have more to offer.

2xLS1 05-05-2005 11:59 PM

Weight transfer does not mean body squat. In a proberly set up launch suspension, the body should rise while the suspension pushes the rear end down. If softer springs were the answer, why do people run air bags in the rear springs.

WJ SOM SS 05-06-2005 01:11 PM

I spoke w/Jay on this subject as well. He suggested either stock, or Trans Am convertible springs....That's for a car making 400+ hp. My motor is stock, including the c.i. exhaust manifolds. I dyno only 345 hp. I ran the V6 springs and the stock springs, both w/rt. side air bag at 12-20 psi. (depending on track conditions). The V6 were always .03 better than the stock rear springs. Low 12.30's, low 109 mph, 1.67 sixties best. 3.23's, Vig 3200, and 26-8.5x15 ET Drags. I'm only trapping 4500 rpm... Wish I could get 3.50's for a 10 bolt....It'd be perfect for my combo... WJ

WJ SOM SS 05-06-2005 01:16 PM


Originally Posted by 2xLS1
Weight transfer does not mean body squat. In a proberly set up launch suspension, the body should rise while the suspension pushes the rear end down. If softer springs were the answer, why do people run air bags in the rear springs.

Most people run 1 air bag on rt. side, only. This is to pre-load rear suspension to compensate forbody torque, or twist. Pre-load is good. WJ

mongse 05-06-2005 03:55 PM

Don't run a softer spring in the rear. What are your QA1s set on?

WJ SOM SS 05-06-2005 04:21 PM


Originally Posted by mongse
Don't run a softer spring in the rear. What are your QA1s set on?

QA1's? I'm still running stock shocks all around w/front swaybar links disconnected. I might buy Competition Engineering rear drag shocks...$80/pr. QA1's not in my race budget right now... :D WJ

mongse 05-06-2005 10:34 PM

I meant the guy who started the thread. I thought I was going crazy for a second. :lol:

n2o 05-08-2005 03:25 PM

I do not have hal's in the rear. I was thinking about getting some though.

mongse 05-09-2005 10:18 AM


Originally Posted by n2o
I do not have hal's in the rear. I was thinking about getting some though.

I meant the QA1s on the front. Stock spring rate in the rear is just fine.

n2o 05-09-2005 05:09 PM

QA1s set on 2 at the strip.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands