Jason 98 TA

iTrader: (4)

Guys a week or so ago we finished a LS1 M6 99 car with PRC Stage 2.5 5.3l heads & 228R camshaft!

Mods:
LS1 C5
M6
Dynatech Headers & Cats
Stock Mufflers
PRC Stage 2.5 5.3l Heads
TSP 228R Camshaft
Vararam Intake
Ls6 Intake
Stock Maf, & TB

NUMBERS ARE SAE!!

Jason 98 TA

iTrader: (4)

I started a new thread sae vs std in case anyone wants to discuss corrections..

TXZ28LS1

iTrader: (5)

nice numbers TSP..

Droptopws6

iTrader: (13)

Those are great numbers. Im trying to figure out why everyone rags on GM castings. I mean, how much more could you squeeze out of a set of TEA's or AFR's? Thats a real question, not rhetorical.

Abdullah

iTrader: (2)

very good numbers. i expect another 30rwhp/30rwtq once you add a ported 92mm Fast/92mm TB and catback exhaust system.

blu1

Not to be the ******* but I know this is a completely different graph than the one posted in the original deleted thread. The graph in the original thread the pull started at 3700rpms so why take it down and post a different graph if the original cropped graph was a higher HP number and in fact SAE corrected. The curves are quite a bit different as well, but Im just a nobody that will be deemed a hater for bringing this up.

Sales2@Texas-speed

iTrader: (5)

No worries....Jason will post every graph of every pull he made on the car just for you.

Droptopws6

iTrader: (13)

Before this thread goes to ****, any thoughts on my question above? Post #4

blwn_00gt

iTrader: (17)

..hahaha

Jon@Texas-Speed

iTrader: (18)

In all honesty, there isn't much at all. The advantages on an aftermarket head are typically the thicker deck of the head along with a laid over valve angle on some like the PRC, TFS, and ETP heads.

As far as which will make more power, it can go either way. I have seen our PRC 5.3L head go 7-8 FWHP more than a popular 205cc aftermarket head out of the box! It really just comes down to the combo.

Jon

Jon@Texas-Speed

iTrader: (18)

I guess we'll continue to try to keep this thread off track.....

Here's both sae & std for your inspection....

Droptopws6

iTrader: (13)

Thank you, that's kind of what I thought. When people say the GM heads don't compare, I just don't know where that comes from. Seems like they can be compared.

blu1

You guys show a lot of maturity sometimes, especially being business owners. Makes no sense to me why you would delete a thread and then post a completely different graph showing a lower number and starting at a different rpm. I mean the cropped graph was SAE right?

blu1

thank you, so these graphs posted here are from a completely different car than the cropped graph posted in the original deleted thread that started at 3700 rpms, makes perfect sense now...

willyfastz

Deff. not the same car, looks more like a MS cam with the jump in torque.


We all have to advertise, but do we decieve the customer while doing so?

Jon@Texas-Speed

iTrader: (18)

not trying to deceive anyone, please if anyone has the original pic post it! That way we can compare.

blu1

It was on your server and in the original thread that you guys deleted. So you win!

434rwhp and 404rwtq starting at about 3700 rpms and well above 375rwtq at that point.

Jon@Texas-Speed

iTrader: (18)

please guys post the original, Jason deleted it & I guess you guys both have it because your so familiar with it.

Jon@Texas-Speed

iTrader: (18)

Blu you guys must have it if we're trying to screw someone. It was deleted & replaced & if it's deleted off our server it doesn't go in the recycle bin. Please one of you guys post the original pic if your so sure. This is the only way we can prove nothing fishy is going on...


Does anyone know how to pull it from the temporary internet files?

blu1

lol sorry I didn't save it but I do know what I saw. Its ok, its gone now so no need to worry about it, you guys are covered.