Cartek's Stage 3X H/C preliminary dyno numbers, 482 RWHP and 416 RWTQ.
11-30-2003, 07:05 PM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cartek's Stage 3X H/C preliminary dyno numbers, 482 RWHP and 416 RWTQ. This is a preliminary dyno graph, 482 RWHP and 416 RWTQ out of our stage 3X package on a stock factory short block, headers, X pipe, full exhaust, 93 octane (pump gas), Cartek LS6 Stage 3-X ported heads, Cartek stage 3-X cam(no final cam specs yet), Modified LS6 intake (TPIS posted by Cartek). The current short block being tested is tired and I think that with a new short block, 490s are obtainable.
Brent ran 10.59 @ 129.95 and 10.60 @ 130.38 with his stage 2-X rev. 2 making 463 RWHP and 409 RWTQ. He should be in the 10.40s with this package.
Julio
Brent ran 10.59 @ 129.95 and 10.60 @ 130.38 with his stage 2-X rev. 2 making 463 RWHP and 409 RWTQ. He should be in the 10.40s with this package.
Julio
11-30-2003, 07:14 PM
#5
Let the dyno racing begin. It's funny how you guys are constantly putting a "one up" dyno # out everytime new #'s are posted.
Nice PEAK #'s. Hence the word PEAK. That graph looks like a Supra. Only makes 350 ft lbs @ 4000 rpm's? Gonna need 4:56's in a full weight F-body for that setup
Holy fuggin RPM. Hope nobody plans on running this package with a stock shortblock.
This is getting rediculous....
/Flame suit on......
Trending Topics
Hehehe
11-30-2003, 07:26 PM
#10
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well thank you Cartek for posting some numbers good to see you guys chime in here every now and then. Only concern I have about these stage 3X heads as compared to your stage 2X heads is your stage 2Xs seem to have a flatter torque curve. Bring us some track numbers and prove all the nay sayers wrong.
11-30-2003, 07:27 PM
#11
i will say this setup doesnt look like it should be for everyone. in fact too many guys see this type of dyno and think it would be good for a daily driver. think valvetran.
but given that this combo will launch at well into 6K rpms and shift at 7100+ it should be great for the track....for a little while. but that is just my un-informed education looking at only the dynograph. the peaky tq wouldnt be as fun on the street IMHO. looking at it again, it looks like a ls1 with a centrifigual blower
11-30-2003, 07:30 PM
#12
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.. that's sick!! Nice job Julio and crew. 
Brent's setup is gonna HAUL ***!! A 7200 shiftpoint looks to be about perfect with that powercurve and the Z06 tranny ratios.
Any more info about this modified LS6 intake?
Jason
11-30-2003, 07:35 PM
#13
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Damian
Let the dyno racing begin. It's funny how you guys are constantly putting a "one up" dyno # out everytime new #'s are posted.
Nice PEAK #'s. Hence the word PEAK. That graph looks like a Supra. Only makes 350 ft lbs @ 4000 rpm's? Gonna need 4:56's in a full weight F-body for that setup
Holy fuggin RPM. Hope nobody plans on running this package with a stock shortblock.
This is getting rediculous....
/Flame suit on......
If 10.58 @ 130.6 mph is not backing it up, then what is?
Julio
11-30-2003, 07:50 PM
#15
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the props guys, there is still more in this package. This is with a hydraulic roller. We haven't finalized a price on this yet, there is more testing to be done.
Julio
Julio
11-30-2003, 07:52 PM
#16
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets not listen to the nay sayers. I must say those are some AWESOME numbers, it seems like you guys have been at the forefront in heads/cam technology for these car. Keep up the good work
11-30-2003, 08:07 PM
#18
Personally, I think the cam needs to be on a harder lobe and have 4 more degrees of advance built in. That might make it more of a "streetable" package. It'll also bring the torque up in the lower RPM's. It seems a bit low IMO. Nice numbers though. Should be a fast "track" car.
11-30-2003, 08:08 PM
#19
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
Big numbers! If I get a Z06 this year there you guys are on the list for sure!
Damian let's ease off, I don't recall those guys ever referencing your combo so I'm not sure why you are suddenly the Gene Siskel of dyno numbers.
Damian let's ease off, I don't recall those guys ever referencing your combo so I'm not sure why you are suddenly the Gene Siskel of dyno numbers.