Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Dyno results - poor parts combo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2009, 01:27 PM
  #21  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
jegten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

there is a GTO in florida with the same heads 59cc, F14 cam, ported FAST 92, 92mm tb, kooks, ud pulley, that made 466rwhp/422rwtq.
so, if you are decide on the bigger cam, well...
Old 10-05-2009, 03:01 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,964
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Damian
Definitely on the low side. The cam only cars I do are typically in the 410-420rwhp area with stock 241 castings and LS6 intakes.

As stated, you have budget heads and a relatively small cam. TQ curve looks good though.

Don't spend another $2000+ on heads. Just throw a $400 NX kit on it and hose the bitch with a 100 shot.
Are you saying it's on the low side for the parts combination? Can't do N2O, rules prohibit it.

Originally Posted by jegten
there is a GTO in florida with the same heads 59cc, F14 cam, ported FAST 92, 92mm tb, kooks, ud pulley, that made 466rwhp/422rwtq.
so, if you are decide on the bigger cam, well...
I'd have to see the graph. I need to be able to pull real hard in second gear sometimes as low as 10-15MPH and be able to minimize shifting... I need that torque down low
Old 10-05-2009, 04:32 PM
  #23  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
firefighter813x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'll take a new shortblock than spend $3500 on heads.
Old 10-05-2009, 11:26 PM
  #24  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
jegten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JimMueller
...
I'd have to see the graph. I need to be able to pull real hard in second gear sometimes as low as 10-15MPH and be able to minimize shifting... I need that torque down low
i hear you.
you might have to reconsider then. maybe a stroker?
here is the link to that graph, i figure i post the link instead of just bringing the pic of his graph.
GTOdyno graph
Old 10-06-2009, 12:29 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
lilbuddy1587's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just throw a FAS... Nevermind...

As was said, budget heads = budget power.
Old 10-06-2009, 08:25 AM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
sscamaroburn02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,053
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

i'm running those same 2.5 heads/233/239 cam/lt's/FAST and put down 431 hp and 391 tq. With budget heads I thought they performed well. I didn't expect big numbers like heads costing $1300 or more.
Old 10-06-2009, 09:08 AM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,964
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Ironically, this thread was recently posted. There are people using a stalled auto and a 9" rear end or TH400 making the same numbers as me. I've got a M6/10-bolt.

Also, the parts in this thread are significantly different enough for me to lose 30rwhp and 30rwtq peak?
- heads are the same
- cam is a 239/242 111LSA
- Kooks stepped headers w/o cats

I had requested stepped headers, but George at ARH told Mike Norris that there was no benefit for using stepped headers for my size motor so we went with the normal headers. So can just the stepped headers and cam cause this sizable difference?

Last edited by JimMueller; 10-06-2009 at 11:21 AM.
Old 10-06-2009, 11:38 AM
  #28  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Maybe a leak down/compression check is in order?
Old 10-06-2009, 12:30 PM
  #29  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,964
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Did a compression test last April, to try to confirm poor Fast92 gains over the LS6 intake. Thread is here. Wanted to try to eliminate any mechanical problems before having the car tuned. Never did a leakdown test though. It does burn some oil but the catch can seems to be doing it's job.
Old 10-07-2009, 11:18 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
corvet786c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Port St. Lucie, Fl
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I just dynoed mine with AFR heads ported vengence Fast and 224/228/114 cam this morning I made 427 hp 398 tq. I figure I am abouit 430 like you. But it is what it is.
Old 10-07-2009, 11:29 AM
  #31  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,964
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by corvet786c
I just dynoed mine with AFR heads ported vengence Fast and 224/228/114 cam this morning I made 427 hp 398 tq. I figure I am abouit 430 like you. But it is what it is.
I'd personally be PO'ed if I had AFR heads that generated the same tuned results as a ported stock casting.
Old 10-07-2009, 11:35 AM
  #32  
Jedi Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Gh0st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimMueller
I'd personally be PO'ed if I had AFR heads that generated the same tuned results as a ported stock casting.
Why? his numbers are fine with that combo. I believe NicD has a baby cam like that, fast92, and afr 205, made same power.
Old 10-07-2009, 01:27 PM
  #33  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Dennis@SpectacleSolutions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dom
1. Can't compare two dynos.
2. You have 5.3 heads. They give nice compression but don't flow as well as 243s. Those are most likely holding you back.
3. Your cam is mild.

I think your dyno is pretty close to where it should be.
agreed.
Old 10-07-2009, 02:06 PM
  #34  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

First of all, for a set of AFR 205's to cost $3500, they must come with some really trick hardware. I set of CNC AFR 205's with standard hardware will cost you just a hair over $2,200.00 and will perform with the correct cam. I just saw a set that were sold in the classifieds for $1900 and they were hand worked by Tony so keep an eye out. Lot's of deals out there right now.
Old 10-07-2009, 02:47 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
corvet786c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Port St. Lucie, Fl
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

To the OP what is your exhaust set up like. I am running Pacesetters 1 3/4 with high flow cats w/ flowmaster merge collector stock ported MAF and steel flywheel all on 10 bolt.
Old 10-08-2009, 10:34 PM
  #36  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,964
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by corvet786c
To the OP what is your exhaust set up like. I am running Pacesetters 1 3/4 with high flow cats w/ flowmaster merge collector stock ported MAF and steel flywheel all on 10 bolt.
ARH 1 3/4" with ARH cat'ed y-pipe into SLP dual-dual exhaust, with exhaust dump just after axle. No MAF, 13.5lb flywheel, steel driveshaft, 10-bolt with 3.73's.
Old 12-02-2009, 01:47 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,964
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

So this fella has a 9" compared to my 10-bolt, same 'budget' TSP 5.3 heads and chamber size, cam with a bigger split, he doesn't have AC, dyno'ed at Texas Speed...

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-dynotune.html

He has 30rwhp and 30rwtq over me...why? His torque curve is wider and peak power is also higher. WTF is wrong with my motor?
Old 12-02-2009, 02:32 PM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have those heads with a 232/238 6xx 6xx 111lsa cam and ported fast 90/90..When it had a 3500 stall and stock 3:23 it put down 435rwhp and 407rwt

Added a 4400 stall,and 3:73 gears (wich both rob "dyno" numbers) and now dyno 426rwhp

Hope this helps you out
Old 12-02-2009, 04:26 PM
  #39  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Numbers look good to me for the setup.

I'm seeing this more and more where, if someone doesn't make 400+ with a cam only setup or 450+ with a heads/cam setup, then they immediately think there's a problem somewhere. You have to look at what cam and what heads were used (along with supporting mods) like everyone in here is saying.
Old 12-02-2009, 04:52 PM
  #40  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Jim,

I think it comes down to the fact that some dynos are stingier than others. The important thing is looking at the delta from where you were before the mods to where you are now...on the same dyno. Chances are good that some of those 460rwhp dyno runs on happier dynos would only put out 430rwhp on yours. It happens. I hate stingy dynos. They can make you hate your combo even when there's nothing wrong with it.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.


Quick Reply: Dyno results - poor parts combo?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 AM.