JROWS6

iTrader: (1)

You were right on

Kingc8r

iTrader: (21)

in the end like others said they're just numbers. Congrats

LilJayV10

iTrader: (39)

Good numbers OP. Mustang Dyno's make people cry, LOL. I'd rather make 400rwhp on a Mustang Dyno than on a Dynojet.

AINT SKEERED

iTrader: (2)

Nice gains for sure. strong little combo , port those heads and bump the compression up you will see even more power.
or just put a small shot on as is

jmilz28

iTrader: (13)

That curve and those numbers look VERY close to the 2016 LT1 cars in the Camaro. Really nice, any way you cut it. Stay on top of your springs and oil changes and it should run a good long time. Nice work.

madmike9396

iTrader: (29)

What's it run OP ?

BlackNiteWS6

iTrader: (2)

I'm glad i saw this post again. It's great to see the gains you got with the 243's and the EPS cam. It seems that head/cam combo works great.
I see that you added a Fast 92mm and 92mm TB and a larger MAF. And you got 21hp and 12tq. Can you post a dyno sheet? It be nice to see the power curves. And i'm not trying to dismiss the Fast intake, but the intake has a larger TB opening as does the 85mm MAF. So i'm curious to see what the intake itself made. I mean you gained HP with a larger MAF and larger TB to match the intake. So i would think the MAF gave ya about 7hp to 8hp, So it seems the Fast intake and the 92mm TB actually gave you maybe only 15hp and maybe only 10tq. What gains at the track did ya see? Post a time slip if you can before the intake and after. I really liked what your car did even before the intake, tb, and maf. Doesn't seem worth well over $1200 or more for the intake and tb does it?

T.Man

Are you going to thread-necro any and all old threads related to the FAST intake simply because you don't like it? My god...

tech@WS6store

iTrader: (2)

Pretty much. You cant just compare peak to peak either. The larger plenum volume would feed a hungry engine also. That small of a cam would obviously show lower gains than a larger cam, but look at the max rpm it peaks at vs the ls6 intake also.

Oh yeah on the $1200 part...
$1169 shipped with billet nw tb.

JROWS6

iTrader: (1)

Best it ran was 12.8 @115 2.2 60ft, on old Hoosiers. Didn't get the chance to re-run it with a better tire, also no longer have the car. Have a different bird now, just doing cam/fbo. Just ran a 13.297 @108 2.062 60ft, car has 97k miles on the dash, 2002 M6 Ws6 (Bone Stock). Shooting for low 12s high 11s for this next setup. As far as the fast intake being worth the money, never really had the chance to test its true potential, I can agree that it was expensive. Lift on the cam was 604/605.

JROWS6

iTrader: (1)

For this next setup, keeping the stock ls6 intake, but will run the 85 MAF.