6.0, ported 243s, fast setup w/supporting mods.. 356 hp?
#81
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
So it basically made the exact same HP and TQ as the OP's car with a 6.0, bigger cam, ported Patriot heads, and a FAST 92/92 setup? You need to order that decal for the dyno Kent. It's a true Heartbreaker.
Do you have the graph? Does it look similar to the graph I sent you from when my car was on that other dyno?
Do you have the graph? Does it look similar to the graph I sent you from when my car was on that other dyno?
#82
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: MO
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So it basically made the exact same HP and TQ as the OP's car with a 6.0, bigger cam, ported Patriot heads, and a FAST 92/92 setup? You need to order that decal for the dyno Kent. It's a true Heartbreaker.
Do you have the graph? Does it look similar to the graph I sent you from when my car was on that other dyno?
Do you have the graph? Does it look similar to the graph I sent you from when my car was on that other dyno?
If you go to a better intake/tb setup you will get up on me for sure. I'm curious to see the difference in headers, I don't think it will be that much until you switch out that intake manifold.
Also your car is low as ****!
#83
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
Yea, my car made basically the same power as you, I think your heads are really good.
If you go to a better intake/tb setup you will get up on me for sure. I'm curious to see the difference in headers, I don't think it will be that much until you switch out that intake manifold.
Also your car is low as ****!
If you go to a better intake/tb setup you will get up on me for sure. I'm curious to see the difference in headers, I don't think it will be that much until you switch out that intake manifold.
Also your car is low as ****!
I'm going to raise the care up some. It's sitting on Viking 4 corner coilovers, so I can adjust the ride height pretty easily.
#91
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
So it basically made the exact same HP and TQ as the OP's car with a 6.0, bigger cam, ported Patriot heads, and a FAST 92/92 setup? You need to order that decal for the dyno Kent. It's a true Heartbreaker. Do you have the graph? Does it look similar to the graph I sent you from when my car was on that other dyno?
#93
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
I still really love your car
#97
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
I went for the SE 1 7/8" for the price. I think I lost a little bottom (from the seat of the pants stab). I know, I know all that will argue...just my opinion. I will say that it now carries like crazy on motor and nitrous. I still have a LS6 intake and 241 heads Had my best 60' last Sunday in 85 S. FL heat BTW, 1.46...still haven't weighed this pig but it is full weight + roll bar, SFC, S60 rear, etc.
#98
11 Second Club
If it couldn't make any more power up top, with the new headers, I would ,at least, hope the top end to be close to the same as it was.
Last edited by SoFla01SSLookinstok; 04-24-2016 at 04:01 PM.
#100
11 Second Club
Do you think it could be something else causing the power loss? Losing fuel pressure, weak valve springs? I would try & make sure of this first.
It seems you were on the right track with the mid range tq increase. Then losing upper rpm hp seems odd. Do you think it has to do with the different brand of header? The SW headers are over $1k more than the SE headers new. There is probably a good reason. I don't think I could expect too much from the $280 set of budget headers.
It seems you were on the right track with the mid range tq increase. Then losing upper rpm hp seems odd. Do you think it has to do with the different brand of header? The SW headers are over $1k more than the SE headers new. There is probably a good reason. I don't think I could expect too much from the $280 set of budget headers.