Any thoughts on this dyno sheet?
#1
Any thoughts on this dyno sheet?
It is a 4.070x4.125
comp 10.38:1
Frankenstein ls3 ported heads
pat g cam 234/238 .604/.604 110 lc
vixtor intake
QF an 950
91 octane 28 deg timing
this is in a play jet boat
Runs great but the tq curve is very flat. wouldn't have mind a little more tq up around 5500 and a closer tq/hp peak. Thoughts?
comp 10.38:1
Frankenstein ls3 ported heads
pat g cam 234/238 .604/.604 110 lc
vixtor intake
QF an 950
91 octane 28 deg timing
this is in a play jet boat
Runs great but the tq curve is very flat. wouldn't have mind a little more tq up around 5500 and a closer tq/hp peak. Thoughts?
#4
TECH Addict
Did PatG spec that cam specifically for this? It doesn't seem right for rectangle port heads with only 4* of exhaust bias. But I don't know ****, so don't quote me on that. And as mentioned, raising the compression would definitely help unless fuel quality is dictating static compression. If you can, shoot for ~11.5:1 with ~0.035 quench.
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
Did PatG spec that cam specifically for this? It doesn't seem right for rectangle port heads with only 4* of exhaust bias. But I don't know ****, so don't quote me on that. And as mentioned, raising the compression would definitely help unless fuel quality is dictating static compression. If you can, shoot for ~11.5:1 with ~0.035 quench.
Also, if you really want to shift the power band up a little, retard the cam two degrees.
#6
Ya only 4 deg split. Went that way because it is carbed.
It runs on 91 octane so ya the comp is low and the cam is small to be very reliable. Retarding the cam is interesting.
It runs on 91 octane so ya the comp is low and the cam is small to be very reliable. Retarding the cam is interesting.
#7
It is a 4.070x4.125
comp 10.38:1
Frankenstein ls3 ported heads
pat g cam 234/238 .604/.604 110 lc
vixtor intake
QF an 950
91 octane 28 deg timing
this is in a play jet boat
Runs great but the tq curve is very flat. wouldn't have mind a little more tq up around 5500 and a closer tq/hp peak. Thoughts?
comp 10.38:1
Frankenstein ls3 ported heads
pat g cam 234/238 .604/.604 110 lc
vixtor intake
QF an 950
91 octane 28 deg timing
this is in a play jet boat
Runs great but the tq curve is very flat. wouldn't have mind a little more tq up around 5500 and a closer tq/hp peak. Thoughts?
247.9/.491 = 504.9
Applying J607 (STD) would be 1 % less right at 500 HP.
Weather in Edmonton, Alberta 15 AP 16 was:
30.06 "HG Baro
57% F temp (14 C)
52% humidity
This assumes outside air was supplied to the intake tract.
A 14% correction factor was applied to the raw numbers based upon the fuel flow/BSFC. This would mean the operator would have had to enter 28 "HG baro, and 125 F air temp to get that value on a STD correction.
I doubt that the fuel meter is the cause, because .49 is reasonable number for full power on gasoline. If you watched the operator, Did they enter the weather data and fuel specific gravity values into the software before your test?