444hp 394tq on a Mustang Dyno
#1
444hp 394tq on a Mustang Dyno
Got the new motor together and and had it dynoed on a Mustang Dyno this weekend.
The motor is a 347ci forged bottom with 5.3 stage 2.5 heads, Fast 90mm intake and TB,Kooks stepped headers,Th-400, 12bolt/4.10 gears, 28" Hoosier drags.
The best pull it made was 444hp 394tq
The motor is a 347ci forged bottom with 5.3 stage 2.5 heads, Fast 90mm intake and TB,Kooks stepped headers,Th-400, 12bolt/4.10 gears, 28" Hoosier drags.
The best pull it made was 444hp 394tq
#5
Originally Posted by Bo White
What cam and brand of heads? Great #s on a Mustang
#7
Originally Posted by Bo White
Thanx, I seen the sig after posting and didnt change it since the cam was still unknown. Also I hadnt heard of TSR and was also curious, looks like the cam specs are
TSR = Eric Bradby from "E.B. Porting" in Providence Forge, Va.
TJ
Trending Topics
#12
Originally Posted by chaos
This may be a dumb question, but what's the difference between a mustang dyno and any other dynoe?
Mustang dyno= the roller is controlled by eddy current. As rpms go up it increases drag to simulate real world conditions.
#13
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cali/Bay Area
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those are awesome numbers!
Considering this is a mustang dyno and through an unlocked TH400, 12 bolt/4.10's, those numbers are very impressive. If this were an M6 stock rear end car on a dynojet, you would see 480ish I bet...
I think mustang dyno's are load dyno's, correct? they show x % drivetrain loss over a dyno jet.
Edit: you beat me to it..
Dan
Considering this is a mustang dyno and through an unlocked TH400, 12 bolt/4.10's, those numbers are very impressive. If this were an M6 stock rear end car on a dynojet, you would see 480ish I bet...
I think mustang dyno's are load dyno's, correct? they show x % drivetrain loss over a dyno jet.
Edit: you beat me to it..
Dan
#14
Originally Posted by DanZ28
Those are awesome numbers!
I think mustang dyno's are load dyno's, correct? they show x % drivetrain loss over a dyno jet.
Dan
I think mustang dyno's are load dyno's, correct? they show x % drivetrain loss over a dyno jet.
Dan
#15
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Very very impressive..
The Mustang dyno tells me this setup wouldve made another 25RW over a dynojet not to mention the TH400 is killing power,This engine would make over 500RW threw a 6sp
I dont know why u would wanna run more than 93 octane with 11.1,that should be fine w/our engines but this is Lethals setup so they would know more than me.
Hawk u have one amazing setup
Now go run those 9's...
The Mustang dyno tells me this setup wouldve made another 25RW over a dynojet not to mention the TH400 is killing power,This engine would make over 500RW threw a 6sp
I dont know why u would wanna run more than 93 octane with 11.1,that should be fine w/our engines but this is Lethals setup so they would know more than me.
Hawk u have one amazing setup
Now go run those 9's...
#20
Restricted User
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is the torque so low if this is an unlocked converter? Numbers don't make sense. That is a whole lot iof HP for a 347 through a T400 on a Mustang Dyno. Post the graph...