Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Torquer II, PRC Stage 2.5 Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2005, 08:59 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
iamsickofitall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Torquer II, PRC Stage 2.5 Results

Got my setup tuned at TTP. It seems a tad low to me but I have no baseline to compare against and I know I have limiting factors such as cats on my setup. The rest of my mods are in the sig.
Attached Thumbnails Torquer II, PRC Stage 2.5 Results-dynograph-8-30-05.jpg  
Old 09-09-2005, 09:14 AM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (58)
 
Z'mnypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I would say that it is a little low. Removing the cats would help a bit but not that much. Still pretty impressive #'s though.. Did you not spray it on the dyno?
Old 09-09-2005, 09:24 AM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (18)
 
TTPMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No spray. We adjusted the timing up and down to try to squeek more power but that was it...
Old 09-09-2005, 09:48 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
iamsickofitall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TTPMatt
No spray. We adjusted the timing up and down to try to squeek more power but that was it...
what he said
Old 09-09-2005, 11:28 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Seems a little low to me, I'm shooting for 440+rwhp with my PRC's, granted they have 2.055/1.60 valves, and I have roughly 410rwhp now, but I would think you should net more than that. Aren't there people hitting near 400rwhp with that cam alone?
Old 09-09-2005, 12:01 PM
  #6  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Do you have a baseline from before the h/c? That is always the best way to determine the performance gains. I think we'll start to see alot of dyno results coming up very soon. We've been shipping alot of the back orders here lately. We should also see some more independent results from Jason @ Thunder pretty soon, he's installing his set this weekend hopefully

Can you post the before graph?
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 09-09-2005, 02:36 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
iamsickofitall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
Do you have a baseline from before the h/c? That is always the best way to determine the performance gains. I think we'll start to see alot of dyno results coming up very soon. We've been shipping alot of the back orders here lately. We should also see some more independent results from Jason @ Thunder pretty soon, he's installing his set this weekend hopefully

Can you post the before graph?
no baseline dyno numbers
Old 09-09-2005, 03:18 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What does the flow sheet say from PRC?
Old 09-09-2005, 04:44 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
black_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Seems pretty low.
Old 09-09-2005, 05:11 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Only way to know what kind of gain you really achieved with the heads/cam would be if you had a baseline before you added them. Thats what I'll be doing before I add my cam, and then again if I get heads. No other way. Hell, you could have been putting 330 full bolt-ons down before the heads cam(just a weak tune/no tune?), in which case 415 is a hell of a gain.
Old 09-09-2005, 05:50 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
Only way to know what kind of gain you really achieved with the heads/cam would be if you had a baseline before you added them. Thats what I'll be doing before I add my cam, and then again if I get heads. No other way. Hell, you could have been putting 330 full bolt-ons down before the heads cam(just a weak tune/no tune?), in which case 415 is a hell of a gain.
I don't know Cyph, I still think it's too low. I started with 347rwhp with my stock cam to 405rwhp with a cam only swap, nothing else. I think he should be in the 430rwhp range with that cam and the heads if things are working out ok, especially since he looks to be on the stock 10 bolt and a single disk clutch.
Old 09-10-2005, 02:36 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
SilverSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think that's bad at all. Remember that TSP, more often than not, dynos with a true dual catless set-up. I think that alone would put you right around 440 HP and 400 TQ.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 AM.