Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Poured Tons of cash into my car and I feel like I am being robbed!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2006, 10:42 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SouthernSilverSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Poured Tons of cash into my car and I feel like I am being robbed!

OK, all of my mods are in my sig, please tell me what HP you think I should be putting down (on a Mustang dyno). After a few opinions, I will reveal the number HPE "tuned" my car to.
Old 05-23-2006, 10:49 PM
  #2  
"All Motor 9 Second club member"
iTrader: (60)
 
TXCAMSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: On the Bumper!
Posts: 3,235
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

330 rwhp? What were you expecting? Is it just a bolt on car?



The 85mm air lids are back ordered through TSP for quite some time so I wouldn't get in a hurry on that one.

Share all the info so we can really evaluate the situation.
Old 05-23-2006, 10:52 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
JoeyGC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St Joe, MO
Posts: 2,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

290-300ish Hp, on stock heads/cam right?
Old 05-23-2006, 10:56 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

on a mustang dyno, I would guess 315ish. Its an Auto and a98 to add. You realy dont have mods and I wouldnt even put any power towards that manifold and TB, no gains on your combo yet. So yeah, I would almost even say high 290's maybe.

You have to also tell us if the convertor was locked or not.

Rick
Old 05-23-2006, 10:57 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SouthernSilverSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well reading these other threads, these people are getting 300+HP STOCK and I am getting a measly 334HP and 340 ft/lbs of torque.

Hpe supposedly turned up the timing to just under detonation, and turned up the rev limiter so I would have access to the power up top I was gaining from the manifold. I just feel like $1100 in exhaust $1300 intake plus all of the other b.s. that I should be more than that. Maybe when I do a cam or heads or both that all of the current mods will just be multipliers and I will gain more than average?? Someone please input.
Old 05-23-2006, 10:58 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SouthernSilverSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so whats the b.s. with these people getting 318HP with a feakin lid??
Old 05-23-2006, 11:01 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
waterbug1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Different car, different dyno.
Old 05-23-2006, 11:01 PM
  #8  
"All Motor 9 Second club member"
iTrader: (60)
 
TXCAMSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: On the Bumper!
Posts: 3,235
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Well they rate the stock engines at the fly wheel so that's not to bad really. The additional power from a tune comes in when you have significant mods like a camshaft, heads,headers ect.

The tuner can only do so much at that level besides remove TM and tweak the timing and A/F.

Take it to the track and see what it does. That's the real test.

FWIW- The Mustang Dyno is always quite a bit lower as it adds a load for realistic tuning. Good luck!


James
Old 05-23-2006, 11:05 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SouthernSilverSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

roughly whatkind of numbers would I be loking at on a dynojet??
Old 05-23-2006, 11:05 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

it appears you should've done your homework before you went on a buying spree, buying a bunch of mismatched parts.

334/330 is very respectable on a mustang dyno for a bolt-on AUTOMATIC. i don't know where you get your information, but i think they did a hell of a job with it. being on stock heads/cam, i doubt that high-dollar fast intake would get you much over an ls6, nor would your big badass matching throttlebody, just as examples.
Old 05-23-2006, 11:06 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SouthernSilverSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok I did take it to the 1/8 mile. ran...(off of the top of my memory cant find time slip)

60'---1.990 <---100% sure on this
1/8---8.33??
speed-87 mph

what do stock #s look like??Is this good compared to stock?
Old 05-23-2006, 11:08 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SouthernSilverSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well I plan on heads/cam just haven't got the $$. So I bought the manifolds and then later come the heads/cam
Old 05-23-2006, 11:09 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i trapped 87.59 TONIGHT at the strip with the only motor mods being an ls6 intake, full exhaust, and a lid. 3 mods, totaling a little over $1,000. the engine is still UNTUNED, i had tqm deleted and the shift points adjusted.

i have a 4k stall and 373s, also.

stock i ran 8.73 @ 83 in the 1/8 mile.
Old 05-23-2006, 11:12 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SouthernSilverSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

deleting torque management..what are the benefits, also what #'s would my car put down on a dynojet??roughly...
Old 05-23-2006, 11:15 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
SVT THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Did you do any research before you bought all your parts?? I think the numbers you put down aren't that bad for the mods you have. If I were you...

I would've spent the $1300 you spent on the 90/90 on a big cam and supporting valvetrain and I would've spent the $1100 you spent on exhaust on a set of CNC LS6 heads and bought a cutout. You could be seeing 440+rwhp 400+rwtq if you did that. Check out the dynograph at the bottom of this link https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...0&page=4&pp=20
That is TSP's new head/cam package they have for less than $1500.
You can almost get that if ya sell your 90/90 setup =)
Old 05-23-2006, 11:16 PM
  #16  
Restricted User
iTrader: (1)
 
fenix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i kinda think u shoulda done the opposite ...cuz its not breathing well at the moment, probably breathing tooo much with that 90/90 setup... cuz think about it if u woulda done it the other way around heads/cam first, u woulda been more impressed with numbers..AND all you woulda had left to do was swap a manifold and BAM...more horsepower lol either way u were still gonna be down numbers i guess but w.e hope that helps...down be frustrated about it jus take ur time and swap the stock heads/cam with some nice **** and spray it jus my .o2
Old 05-23-2006, 11:16 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SouthernSilverSpeed
deleting torque management..what are the benefits, also what #'s would my car put down on a dynojet??roughly...
i had tqm removed because i installed a transgo full race/high stall shift kit. it is harsh and caused tqm to put the clamps down during shifts, REALLY bad. those in the stands could see the nose drop, like it was a stick car...

as far as dynojet numbers go, i have read that mustang dynos typically read 15-20% lower than a dynojet, so you can do the math. dynos are tuning tools, nothing more. the only real tell tale sign of a vehicle's performance is seen on your TIMESLIP.
Old 05-23-2006, 11:18 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SouthernSilverSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am going for a multiplier effect. If someone were to drop cam "A" into stock ls1 "A", and drop cam "A" into my car, I would see more power than the other car, right?
Old 05-23-2006, 11:21 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Denom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 619
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SouthernSilverSpeed
well reading these other threads, these people are getting 300+HP STOCK and I am getting a measly 334HP and 340 ft/lbs of torque.

Hpe supposedly turned up the timing to just under detonation, and turned up the rev limiter so I would have access to the power up top I was gaining from the manifold. I just feel like $1100 in exhaust $1300 intake plus all of the other b.s. that I should be more than that. Maybe when I do a cam or heads or both that all of the current mods will just be multipliers and I will gain more than average?? Someone please input.
Let me get this straight, you dynoed at 334rwhp on a mustang dyno with barely any bolt ons????!!!!! I can't believe you are complaining. This is insane.... Alot of guys would like to kill you at this point, cause on a dynojet you'd probably be looking at over 350whp.

Your car is putting down healthy numbers.
Old 05-23-2006, 11:26 PM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

theoretically yes.

but as these cars go...i dunno.

i was 2nd quickest ls1 at the strip, the ONLY one with factory heads/cam. i went the time in sig. the only ls1 quicker and faster than me was spraying on a cam/stall, and still only managed a 11.89 @ 120..

my point: your car's reaction to the cam will depend heavily on the tune.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.