370 LQ4 with LS3 top end Hey guys, I was curious if you could throw out guesses at what kind of power im going to make when I get this engine together. Heres the set up: 2004 LQ4 6.0 Block Bore .030 over Mahle 4.030 L92 forged pistons Eagle Esp 6.125 rods Stock crank LS3 heads Ported by ???? LG Motorsports G6X3 Camshaft 1 7/8 Stainless Works Long tubes 100-150 wet shot T56 Moser 9" 4.30 gear. Thanks in Advance. |
Whats the specs of the cam? |
Specs are top secret apparently. I've heard 235/245 .64x/.61x 111lsa |
Bump?? |
bumpy |
No guesses |
Those heads are way too large (In. runner volume) to make average torque throughout the powerband. N.A. accelaration will be less than ideal but I'll guess 465 rwhp......thing is it will LOVE the juice and should easily eclipse the 600rwhp mark on a 150 shot. Depending on the weight of the car...should run deep tens. |
Car should be right at 3000 without the driver I hope. I was hoping to hear a higher NA hp number. Will it make more power without porting the heads? Also, Anyone ever port there victor jr? |
It is often better to sacrifice some top-end horsepower for a substantial boost in midrange torque. Many people on these forums have gone from L-92s to a 225 AFR or 235 TrickFlow head and have gone faster in the quarter. This is especially true on 364 inchers and even 383 as well as 402/408 combos. |
im building this identicle engine!! just picked up the ls3 heads new for $600 on ebay.. i would say youl be more to the 500 mark and these heads are not to big for the engine if it was then why did GM put l92 heads on a 6.0l? and the ls3 is a 6.2l thats only 6ci bigger then the 370 ur building? hmmmmm..i think u got a stout combo! |
Originally Posted by allan808
(Post 15601533)
im building this identicle engine!! just picked up the ls3 heads new for $600 on ebay.. i would say youl be more to the 500 mark and these heads are not to big for the engine if it was then why did GM put l92 heads on a 6.0l? and the ls3 is a 6.2l thats only 6ci bigger then the 370 ur building? hmmmmm..i think u got a stout combo! Second GM NEVER put L92 heads on a 6.0......6.2 is 4.065" bore Third...they work on a 376" because of fly-by-wire torque management which modulates the throttle body to enhance airspeed by restriction Lastly he may engine dyno 500 but definitely not to the ground. Even the Car Craft guys admitted this fact. |
Originally Posted by A.R. Shale Targa
(Post 15601638)
First his 4.020 bore equals 368 not 370 Second GM NEVER put L92 heads on a 6.0......6.2 is 4.065" bore Third...they work on a 376" because of fly-by-wire torque management which modulates the throttle body to enhance airspeed by restriction Lastly he may engine dyno 500 but definitely not to the ground. Even the Car Craft guys admitted this fact. |
Could I make more power with 243 heads instead? |
Originally Posted by 1badeagle
(Post 15601667)
It's a 370 not a 368. |
Originally Posted by 1badeagle
(Post 15601703)
Could I make more power with 243 heads instead? band. Your car WILL be quicker. Not my opinion....FACT !!!!! |
If you are set on running an LS3 style cylinder head then I would recommend considering our PRC 250cc LS3 aftermarket casting cylinder head. Its going to make great power under the curve as well as up top in the rpm range. Here is a link to them on our website. http://www.texas-speed.com/p-3200-pr...der-heads.aspx |
If it is the case that the 243's are better, then why are there so many guys with 6 liters switch to the ls3 heads and they are making close to or over 500 wheel? |
Second GM NEVER put L92 heads on a 6.0......6.2 is 4.065" bore |
Originally Posted by A.R. Shale Targa
(Post 15601862)
Less peak horsepower but much better average torque throughout the power band. Your car WILL be quicker. Not my opinion....FACT !!!!! |
Originally Posted by lilred1995vette
(Post 15602046)
GM does put l92 heads on the 6.0? engine is called a ly6. Get your info correct, the engine comes in most chevy gas powered hd trucks. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands