View Poll Results: 500rwhp/450rwtq or 450rwhp/475rwtq
Budget 408
12
63.16%
Max effort H/C 6.0
7
36.84%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll
500/450tq or 450/475tq which would you want?
#1
500/450tq or 450/475tq which would you want?
I currently have a LQ9 6.0 and I'm trying to decide to either turn the 6.0 into a max effort H/C setup with CNC TFS 225s, 11.5:1cr, ported FAST 102mm, ARH 1-7/8LTs, and a wicked cam. Or turn the 6.0 into a 408, and run stock 243s, 11.5:1cr, LS6 intake, pacesetter LTs, stock ported TB and a custom cam.
Its one or the other for now. Thats what my budget allows.
Ive done months of research and the H/C 6.0 setup should get me 500/450 and the budget 408 setup should get me 450/470 with massive low end & mid range power. I even overlayed dyno graphs between 2 similar setups. The Budget 408 beats the H/C 6.0 up to 5000 rpm, then the H/C setup takes over.
My car is a street car. I may go to the track once or twice a year for fun. I'm pretty sure the H/C 6.0 would win the drag race over the budget 408.
I know if I did the 408 now, I could always upgrade the top end and make 530/490 later on. But I also think a budget 408 with its massive low end power with my 3.90 gears might be worthless when trying to hook up on the street and it might be better to have a little less power down low (for traction) and build for more top end power which would favor the H/C 6.0.
let me hear your thoughts on this
Its one or the other for now. Thats what my budget allows.
Ive done months of research and the H/C 6.0 setup should get me 500/450 and the budget 408 setup should get me 450/470 with massive low end & mid range power. I even overlayed dyno graphs between 2 similar setups. The Budget 408 beats the H/C 6.0 up to 5000 rpm, then the H/C setup takes over.
My car is a street car. I may go to the track once or twice a year for fun. I'm pretty sure the H/C 6.0 would win the drag race over the budget 408.
I know if I did the 408 now, I could always upgrade the top end and make 530/490 later on. But I also think a budget 408 with its massive low end power with my 3.90 gears might be worthless when trying to hook up on the street and it might be better to have a little less power down low (for traction) and build for more top end power which would favor the H/C 6.0.
let me hear your thoughts on this
Last edited by 30th t/a; 09-29-2012 at 12:41 PM.
#2
Staging Lane
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just recently had this experience. Had a heavily restricted 383 making 330 rwhp/342 rwtq. Just had a cam+exhaust put on, now makes 393 hp/377 tq. This is my daily driver.
The restricted 383 had instant low end power, which was neat, then got boring up to the shiftpoint. Now with the cam+exhaust, after the initial thrust from the converter is done, the motor screams up to the shiftpoint.
With a 60 rwhp/ 30 rwtq gain, I thought I would have major traction issues with worn tires at 9,000 miles. As it turns out, this is not the case at all. I still have yet to get a set of cnc'd heads and a FAST 102. It will be soon.
This description is exactly what you are saying, I know, but to answer the question, I love the max effort build. I definitely prefer it over the instant torque build. I really like how the cam smooths out the power delivery and keeps pulling hard to the end. Plus, you'll get more of those "validation nods" by others from the sound of that wicked cam.
________________________________________
01 Firebird Formula A4, cloth int, t-tops
Built by Next Level Performance, Orlando, FL
Trans built by Transmissions Plus, Kissimmee, FL
Motor : Balanced & blueprinted 383ci, 11:1 comp, 6-bolt main, windage tray, forged eagle rods, forged mahle pistons, forged crank, '11 CTS-V oil pump, Magnum 5/16 pushrods, dual valvesprings w/ti retainers, 42 lb inj, LS6 intake, '02 ZO6 heads, competition valve job, Comp Cams 230/236 114+4 XER, K&N induction, 255 lph fuel pump, American Racing 1-3/4" LTs, 3" y-pipe high flow cats, 3" manual cutout (which stays open for all eternity)
Driveline : FTI 3500, built 4L60E, big trans cooler, PST 3.5' driveshaft, 1350 yoke, Strange S60 4.10
Suspension : BMR k-member, BMR upper&lower front CA, BMR rear lower CA, adj torque arm, panhard bar, stock struts
Running NT555R 315/35R17 on the back
Dynos in at 393 rwhp / 377 rwtq
The restricted 383 had instant low end power, which was neat, then got boring up to the shiftpoint. Now with the cam+exhaust, after the initial thrust from the converter is done, the motor screams up to the shiftpoint.
With a 60 rwhp/ 30 rwtq gain, I thought I would have major traction issues with worn tires at 9,000 miles. As it turns out, this is not the case at all. I still have yet to get a set of cnc'd heads and a FAST 102. It will be soon.
This description is exactly what you are saying, I know, but to answer the question, I love the max effort build. I definitely prefer it over the instant torque build. I really like how the cam smooths out the power delivery and keeps pulling hard to the end. Plus, you'll get more of those "validation nods" by others from the sound of that wicked cam.
________________________________________
01 Firebird Formula A4, cloth int, t-tops
Built by Next Level Performance, Orlando, FL
Trans built by Transmissions Plus, Kissimmee, FL
Motor : Balanced & blueprinted 383ci, 11:1 comp, 6-bolt main, windage tray, forged eagle rods, forged mahle pistons, forged crank, '11 CTS-V oil pump, Magnum 5/16 pushrods, dual valvesprings w/ti retainers, 42 lb inj, LS6 intake, '02 ZO6 heads, competition valve job, Comp Cams 230/236 114+4 XER, K&N induction, 255 lph fuel pump, American Racing 1-3/4" LTs, 3" y-pipe high flow cats, 3" manual cutout (which stays open for all eternity)
Driveline : FTI 3500, built 4L60E, big trans cooler, PST 3.5' driveshaft, 1350 yoke, Strange S60 4.10
Suspension : BMR k-member, BMR upper&lower front CA, BMR rear lower CA, adj torque arm, panhard bar, stock struts
Running NT555R 315/35R17 on the back
Dynos in at 393 rwhp / 377 rwtq
Trending Topics
#10
I also dont like how the LS3 heads have those huge intake runner's. I like that snappy throttle response & low end power and always thought that the car would feel slugglish with the LS3 topend, but then again its a freaking 408! it should make pently of low end with the LS3 topend, hell that might be a good thing running around with 3:90s & street tires (for now).
Im going to look more into this option