Poor fuel economy after turbo
#1
Poor fuel economy after turbo
Now I didn't expect my fuel economy to improve after the turbo, however, I did not expect my cruising fuel economy to get any worse. Before the turbo I would get 19-20mpg on the highway at 65-70mph, now I'm getting 12-13mpg. I can't think of why this is happening.
The narrowband O2's are showing that it's running at stoich because they are switching just fine. The wideband is showing around 14.4 AFR but it could be a bit off. Before the turbo I was averaging about 39 g/s airflow on the highway, now its about 44 g/s. So a little more airflow, but not enough to cause the decrease in fuel economy I'm seeing, IMO.
So if it's not running rich, and the airflow isn't that much higher, then I am stumped as to why the cruise fuel economy took a huge hit. I'm thinking it's probably something in the tune (still working on it with my tuner), but it just doesn't make sense
I don't think there are any exhaust leaks before the NBO2's, but there are some well after the downpipe. I'm running TR6 plugs gaped at 0.028". It's a 1 bar MAF tune with the stock OS (for now).
The narrowband O2's are showing that it's running at stoich because they are switching just fine. The wideband is showing around 14.4 AFR but it could be a bit off. Before the turbo I was averaging about 39 g/s airflow on the highway, now its about 44 g/s. So a little more airflow, but not enough to cause the decrease in fuel economy I'm seeing, IMO.
So if it's not running rich, and the airflow isn't that much higher, then I am stumped as to why the cruise fuel economy took a huge hit. I'm thinking it's probably something in the tune (still working on it with my tuner), but it just doesn't make sense
I don't think there are any exhaust leaks before the NBO2's, but there are some well after the downpipe. I'm running TR6 plugs gaped at 0.028". It's a 1 bar MAF tune with the stock OS (for now).
#3
Teching In
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now I didn't expect my fuel economy to improve after the turbo, however, I did not expect my cruising fuel economy to get any worse. Before the turbo I would get 19-20mpg on the highway at 65-70mph, now I'm getting 12-13mpg. I can't think of why this is happening.
The narrowband O2's are showing that it's running at stoich because they are switching just fine. The wideband is showing around 14.4 AFR but it could be a bit off. Before the turbo I was averaging about 39 g/s airflow on the highway, now its about 44 g/s. So a little more airflow, but not enough to cause the decrease in fuel economy I'm seeing, IMO.
So if it's not running rich, and the airflow isn't that much higher, then I am stumped as to why the cruise fuel economy took a huge hit. I'm thinking it's probably something in the tune (still working on it with my tuner), but it just doesn't make sense
I don't think there are any exhaust leaks before the NBO2's, but there are some well after the downpipe. I'm running TR6 plugs gaped at 0.028". It's a 1 bar MAF tune with the stock OS (for now).
The narrowband O2's are showing that it's running at stoich because they are switching just fine. The wideband is showing around 14.4 AFR but it could be a bit off. Before the turbo I was averaging about 39 g/s airflow on the highway, now its about 44 g/s. So a little more airflow, but not enough to cause the decrease in fuel economy I'm seeing, IMO.
So if it's not running rich, and the airflow isn't that much higher, then I am stumped as to why the cruise fuel economy took a huge hit. I'm thinking it's probably something in the tune (still working on it with my tuner), but it just doesn't make sense
I don't think there are any exhaust leaks before the NBO2's, but there are some well after the downpipe. I'm running TR6 plugs gaped at 0.028". It's a 1 bar MAF tune with the stock OS (for now).
Trending Topics
#8
How much did your IATs change? An intercooler at highway speeds can have a pretty good drop when compared to a poorly placed air filter in an N/A app.
Also, how high is your timing when cruising?
Also, how high is your timing when cruising?
#10
But in closed loop shouldn't the NBO2's be aiming for 14.7 using the fuel trims? According to the activity of the NBO2's, it's not rich. I'm thinking my wideband is off, no surprise, it only "works" about 1/3 of the time.
Crusing IAT's are roughly 10F higher than ambient, before the turbo they were almost exactly ambient. Crusing timing is high 20's low 30's. Before the turbo I tested the cruise timing up into the 40's and it made no difference in fuel economy. The tuner brought it back down in the base tune I'm running now.
Yes, exact same.
Yes, exact same.
#12
The only thing I can think of is that there is an exhaust leak that is letting fresh air in before the NBO2's, so it thinks it's lean and adds fuel to trim it out. But exhaust leaks usually let air out of the exhaust not in, in my experience. I checked for leaks and didn't see/feel any.
FIC is sending me a fresh set of injectors and data to rule out the possibility of a faulty set of injectors. Talk about service!
#19
Teching In
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
Teching In
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Typically turbo cars like 12.8-13.0 depending on the set-up. Only the dyno can really tell you what AFR's you engine makes the most power on. Plus you wanna be on the safer side. So it's always better to be a little rich than lean.