Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Poor fuel economy after turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2013, 03:12 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Poor fuel economy after turbo

Now I didn't expect my fuel economy to improve after the turbo, however, I did not expect my cruising fuel economy to get any worse. Before the turbo I would get 19-20mpg on the highway at 65-70mph, now I'm getting 12-13mpg. I can't think of why this is happening.

The narrowband O2's are showing that it's running at stoich because they are switching just fine. The wideband is showing around 14.4 AFR but it could be a bit off. Before the turbo I was averaging about 39 g/s airflow on the highway, now its about 44 g/s. So a little more airflow, but not enough to cause the decrease in fuel economy I'm seeing, IMO.

So if it's not running rich, and the airflow isn't that much higher, then I am stumped as to why the cruise fuel economy took a huge hit. I'm thinking it's probably something in the tune (still working on it with my tuner), but it just doesn't make sense

I don't think there are any exhaust leaks before the NBO2's, but there are some well after the downpipe. I'm running TR6 plugs gaped at 0.028". It's a 1 bar MAF tune with the stock OS (for now).
Old 05-13-2013, 03:18 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Did you do cam swap with the turbo add-on?
Old 05-13-2013, 03:25 PM
  #3  
Teching In
 
SPDKNGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ferocity02
Now I didn't expect my fuel economy to improve after the turbo, however, I did not expect my cruising fuel economy to get any worse. Before the turbo I would get 19-20mpg on the highway at 65-70mph, now I'm getting 12-13mpg. I can't think of why this is happening.

The narrowband O2's are showing that it's running at stoich because they are switching just fine. The wideband is showing around 14.4 AFR but it could be a bit off. Before the turbo I was averaging about 39 g/s airflow on the highway, now its about 44 g/s. So a little more airflow, but not enough to cause the decrease in fuel economy I'm seeing, IMO.

So if it's not running rich, and the airflow isn't that much higher, then I am stumped as to why the cruise fuel economy took a huge hit. I'm thinking it's probably something in the tune (still working on it with my tuner), but it just doesn't make sense

I don't think there are any exhaust leaks before the NBO2's, but there are some well after the downpipe. I'm running TR6 plugs gaped at 0.028". It's a 1 bar MAF tune with the stock OS (for now).
Could you post you data log? I would look at the injector scaling and or fuel load tables.
Old 05-13-2013, 03:32 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HRHohio
Did you do cam swap with the turbo add-on?
Cam swap was done a few months before the turbo, so I was getting the decent mileage with the cam.

Originally Posted by SPDKNGG
Could you post you data log? I would look at the injector scaling and or fuel load tables.
Log attached. Injectors are 83# @ 4bar from FIC with their data in the tune. I'm using the stock manifold referenced FPR (this is a truck BTW).
Attached Files
File Type: efi
Log_0049.efi (302.0 KB, 100 views)
Old 05-14-2013, 03:34 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
LilJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That tune is still rich at light load part throttle if its 14.4.
Old 05-14-2013, 05:00 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
95bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Since we are on the subject what would a good cruising afr be on 93 and e85?

My wideband reads all fuels in gas scale so whatever is good for gas should be the same for corn right?
Old 05-14-2013, 05:20 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Typically 14.7 at cruise with no load if your wideband only reads afr. My guess is 14.7 on your wideband would be a lambda of 1.
Old 05-14-2013, 08:32 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HexenLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

How much did your IATs change? An intercooler at highway speeds can have a pretty good drop when compared to a poorly placed air filter in an N/A app.

Also, how high is your timing when cruising?
Old 05-14-2013, 09:55 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BMF_Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alexandria, Ky
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

When on the highway, is you cruising coolant temp the same as N/A?
Old 05-14-2013, 10:02 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LilJohn
That tune is still rich at light load part throttle if its 14.4.
But in closed loop shouldn't the NBO2's be aiming for 14.7 using the fuel trims? According to the activity of the NBO2's, it's not rich. I'm thinking my wideband is off, no surprise, it only "works" about 1/3 of the time.


Originally Posted by HexenLord
How much did your IATs change? An intercooler at highway speeds can have a pretty good drop when compared to a poorly placed air filter in an N/A app.

Also, how high is your timing when cruising?
Crusing IAT's are roughly 10F higher than ambient, before the turbo they were almost exactly ambient. Crusing timing is high 20's low 30's. Before the turbo I tested the cruise timing up into the 40's and it made no difference in fuel economy. The tuner brought it back down in the base tune I'm running now.


Originally Posted by BMF_Racing
When on the highway, is you cruising coolant temp the same as N/A?
Yes, exact same.
Old 05-14-2013, 10:33 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BMF_Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alexandria, Ky
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm? ...Same tires and frontal area (mods for intercooler)? Tire pressure the same?
Old 05-14-2013, 11:23 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMF_Racing
Hmm? ...Same tires and frontal area (mods for intercooler)? Tire pressure the same?
Everything is the same. If the drag went up, the engine airflow should go up as well. It did go up, but not by the same amount that the fuel economy went down.

The only thing I can think of is that there is an exhaust leak that is letting fresh air in before the NBO2's, so it thinks it's lean and adds fuel to trim it out. But exhaust leaks usually let air out of the exhaust not in, in my experience. I checked for leaks and didn't see/feel any.

FIC is sending me a fresh set of injectors and data to rule out the possibility of a faulty set of injectors. Talk about service!
Old 05-14-2013, 02:50 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
Cam72aro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sugar Land, Tx
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ferocity02

FIC is sending me a fresh set of injectors and data to rule out the possibility of a faulty set of injectors. Talk about service!
That's some serious customer service on their part. Kudos to them.
Old 05-14-2013, 02:52 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
Cam72aro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sugar Land, Tx
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What was your map sensor reading before and now after?
Old 05-14-2013, 03:00 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cam72aro
What was your map sensor reading before and now after?
MAP didn't change at all with the turbo, still about 42kPa at idle and about 63kPa at cruise.
Old 05-14-2013, 03:48 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Fuel Injector Connection or Clinic?
Old 05-14-2013, 04:00 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sarg
Fuel Injector Connection or Clinic?
Connection
Old 05-14-2013, 04:10 PM
  #18  
Teching In
 
SPDKNGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Question...
How old are your O2's? and have they seen race fuel often?
im am reviewing your logs now..
Old 05-14-2013, 04:13 PM
  #19  
Teching In
 
SPDKNGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LilJohn
That tune is still rich at light load part throttle if its 14.4.
Looks ok to me..more worried about WOT then come back and clean up the cruise and part throttle..
Old 05-14-2013, 04:20 PM
  #20  
Teching In
 
SPDKNGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Typically turbo cars like 12.8-13.0 depending on the set-up. Only the dyno can really tell you what AFR's you engine makes the most power on. Plus you wanna be on the safer side. So it's always better to be a little rich than lean.


Quick Reply: Poor fuel economy after turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 PM.