Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

m6 lq4 with a cam, s475 too big?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2015, 12:11 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dburt86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default m6 lq4 with a cam, s475 too big?

Hey guys, looking for some guidance on my build

stock lq4 with speed inc 1.5TU
t56
pump and meth
looking for 700

So im looking at a couple turbos, and i have my eye on a the BW s475, t6 with the 1.32 housing. Only because its my cheapest option to get a quality turbo.

I see alot of guys using this turbo with great success but its hard to find much on a manual car.

Obviously there is going to be a compromise, and i get that. But i also want to leave myself enough head room in the turbo department if i decide to build a motor.

Anyone have a suggestions? I dont have a set budget for a turbo, but im not looking to break the bank.

I do realize this is a loaded question that really cant be answered with too much accuracy, but any opinions will help.
Old 06-23-2015, 12:32 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Not too big at all.
Old 06-23-2015, 12:41 PM
  #3  
Man-Crush Warning
iTrader: (1)
 
Shownomercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,150
Received 119 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

For 700whp?

Yea thats too big IMO.
Old 06-23-2015, 01:11 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dburt86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
For 700whp?

Yea thats too big IMO.
700 for now, or whatever it makes with in reason. 800?

But in any case, id like to keep some head room for a built motor
Old 06-23-2015, 02:21 PM
  #5  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
3pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WPG MB
Posts: 1,931
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I run an s480 on my 6.0 5 speed car. Love it.
if I were you I would pay the extra $$ to get the 1.1 a/r t6 turbine housing for that s475/96. You will love it
Old 06-23-2015, 02:24 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dburt86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 3pedals
I run an s480 on my 6.0 5 speed car. Love it.
if I were you I would pay the extra $$ to get the 1.1 a/r t6 turbine housing for that s475/96. You will love it
Thats encouraging to hear. I did think the 1.32AR was going to be a little too big.

Just so we are clear, we are talking about the 6-800$ borgwarner s475 units, correct?
Old 06-23-2015, 02:27 PM
  #7  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
3pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WPG MB
Posts: 1,931
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dburt86
Thats encouraging to hear. I did think the 1.32AR was going to be a little too big.

Just so we are clear, we are talking about the 6-800$ borgwarner s475 units, correct?
Yes, call Jose at forced inductions
Old 06-23-2015, 03:40 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dburt86
700 for now, or whatever it makes with in reason. 800?

But in any case, id like to keep some head room for a built motor
Yea always leave room to grow.
Old 06-24-2015, 10:43 AM
  #9  
FormerVendor
 
LJMSJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Theres also the 92mm turbine wheel option... This wheel will flow almost what the 96mm wheel will flow... and its 100+ grams lighter. That reduction in weight would help transient response tremendously with a manual trans car. its a 200 dollar option over a base 96/1.32 unit and is paired with the 1.10 T6 housing. It would support 100% of the 75mm compressor wheel no problem.
Old 06-24-2015, 11:49 AM
  #10  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
dburt86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LJMSJohn
Theres also the 92mm turbine wheel option... This wheel will flow almost what the 96mm wheel will flow... and its 100+ grams lighter. That reduction in weight would help transient response tremendously with a manual trans car. its a 200 dollar option over a base 96/1.32 unit and is paired with the 1.10 T6 housing. It would support 100% of the 75mm compressor wheel no problem.
I just spent some time talking to John about this over the phone, he had some good info for me and gave me some ideas to research. The 92 with a 1.10 sounds like a good option for manual car on a stock block.

Anyone have any experience with that combo?
Old 06-24-2015, 12:02 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
forcd ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: woodbine, md
Posts: 4,115
Received 228 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

I am not 100% sure, but I think I have a 75/92 110AR, T4 on my 6.0 with a mild cam-pretty happy with it, seems to spool good
I have always had Prochargers, so I don't really know fi my spooling is what is considered normal or not-I know the Prochargers had more guts down low,
but when the turbo hits the boost spikes pretty quick-kind of deceptive speed



Quick Reply: m6 lq4 with a cam, s475 too big?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.