Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

2 years, 80 passes L33 SBE teardown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2016, 02:36 AM
  #1  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default 2 years, 80 passes L33 SBE teardown

Hey all,

After the season ended last year I decided to add forged rods and pistons to the L33. Basically so I could quit saying "don't blow up" as I approached the finish line every pass.
And I thought I might to really turn it up someday.

I bought the LJMS pistons and Compstar rods.

So thought I'd share what I found on disassembly.

Valvetrain all good. Stock rockers, Comp Trunions BTR springs.
I do have a couple of guides that have become sloppy.

The LS9 heads gaskets showed no signs of even thinking about leaking. Great to see after losing LS1 gaskets and then Felpro gaskets.

Cloyes chain a touch loose as compared to the tight it was when new. Still tighter than an LS2 chain. I am also running the chain damper as this block is drilled for one.

Cam and lifters look good.

Pistons all good. Rings all free.
No bent rods. :-)
Bearings (these are the orig) showed slight wear on the rod side. Cap side looked just like I remember when I assembled.

Crank not so hot......a couple of mains were grooved. Not horrible, just catch your finger nail groovy. Bearings are now shiny compared to the dull silver they were when I assembled.
And finally, 7/8 rod journal appears to have a surface crack. I had noted this when I assembled, but it's worse now and will catch your fingernail.
So I need a crank. No sense paying to turn this one and find out it's a real crack.
The thrust however was perfect at .004" the same as when I assembled it.

So maybe I got some dirt in there when assembling. I feel that I was very careful though. #2 and #4 were the worse.

So I need a crank. I do have a nice 5.3 crank from an iron long block I bought.

I have looked into a forged stock stroke unit, but just like everything I research online, there is a failure story about most. So still thinking.
Also considering ARP main studs.......

FWIW, I disassembled, inspected and carefully cleaned this engine before putting it in the car. It was quite gross inside. So at least I'm pleased it stayed together!

Ron
Old 01-07-2016, 02:52 AM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
MrPotatoeHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Worth, IL
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Pics or it didnt happen. HAHA
Old 01-07-2016, 06:17 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
3 window's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,051
Received 185 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

All good to hear aside from the crank. I'd expect the bearings to be a little beat up really. Still can't beat the beatings the factory stuff can take. 15 years ago you'd have $10K or more into an engine to do the same thing! Lookin forward to your updates and progress as always.
Old 01-07-2016, 06:39 AM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
forcd ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: woodbine, md
Posts: 4,116
Received 230 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Except for my thrust bearing, pretty much what I found when I tore down my 6.0-rod side bearings had signs of boost pushing them down, lol, and I had some scratching on the main journals, surprised since like you I cleaned everything, maybe not good enough-I am installing new pistons, but kept the bushed rods, budget you know, lol-i went with flat tops and deep valve reliefs, I fig the comp. was better for street driving
Be interesting to see how much boost you throw at it this year
Old 01-07-2016, 10:41 AM
  #5  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Dragon slyter stock stroke is on my wish list for the future
Old 01-07-2016, 10:55 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
 
Bad Apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Posts: 977
Received 117 Likes on 98 Posts

Default

I've been looking forward to this report. Thanks for sharing your findings!
Old 01-07-2016, 11:02 AM
  #7  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Thanks guys.
I'm thinking I'll stick to budget too and just use my spare 5.3 crank. Otherwise I'll end up with a $1500 crank and as we all know, spending can get out of control in a hurry.
I'm semi retired and hardly getting rich tuning Mopars 😊
Old 01-07-2016, 12:19 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Nice post Ron, we don't get enough posts where the engine was taken apart just for inspection purposes. Usually it for a terrible reason lol!!!
Old 01-07-2016, 01:05 PM
  #9  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Thanks Vince. I thought it would be interesting as well.

I'll get some photos up this evening.
Old 01-07-2016, 01:07 PM
  #10  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

I'm in for pics, thanks for sharing. I'd think you could being your questionable crank to any decent machine shop and have it dye penetrate tested, magnetic particle tested..etc. Cracking there seems pretty uncommon?
Old 01-07-2016, 03:10 PM
  #11  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

I should get it tested. Kind of hate to cannibalize my iron 5.3.
It's hard to photo these shiny surfaces!
Old 01-07-2016, 04:31 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Ron did you reuse the factory rod bolts? I did with my last ill-fated LQ9. Even after that carnage, the big end off all the rods were intact, bearings - rods and crank - looked great. Just well-designed motors I must say.
Old 01-07-2016, 04:56 PM
  #13  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Yes, stock everything.
There was some confusion about the torque angle setting for the rod bolts, 75 or 85 degrees I think?
I split the difference.

Funny, I'm going to let my engine builder of 30 years do my machine work. He doesn't know LS stuff at all and of course told me the rod and main bolts couldn't be re-used.........sigh.

I think he has built two of them.
Old 01-08-2016, 12:38 AM
  #14  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Name:  image_zpsusg8lq2z.jpeg
Views: 74
Size:  228.5 KB

Name:  image_zps9rjtd2wq.jpeg
Views: 74
Size:  191.1 KB

Name:  image_zpse62sgg86.jpeg
Views: 98
Size:  204.3 KB

Enlarge the first photo and look just above the oil hole. Defect resembles the state of Texas.
Old 01-08-2016, 04:09 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
3 window's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,051
Received 185 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Crank doesn't look bad at all. I'd have it tested as I don't see how it would crack in a circle (or in the shape of Texas). You'd think it's crack from the oil journal to somewhere! Can't tell if the color of the bearing is copper or of it's the pic, but the bearing looks fine. Crank journal looks normal for the amount of passes and power the engine was making. Plus, I'm sure the aluminum block doesn't help as far as flexing goes.
Old 01-08-2016, 04:29 AM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
 
gtfoxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I'd be curious to see how those imperfections would show on a magnaflux or if it's just a surface layer anomaly that could be ground out at like 10 under.
Old 01-08-2016, 04:39 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
3 window's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,051
Received 185 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gtfoxy
I'd be curious to see how those imperfections would show on a magnaflux or if it's just a surface layer anomaly that could be ground out at like 10 under.
Exactly, I think the "hardness" finish on these cranks is less than .010. Meaning if you were to turn the crank .010 under, you'd be into the softer metal. I could be wrong though.
Old 01-08-2016, 08:58 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
gtfoxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3 window
Exactly, I think the "hardness" finish on these cranks is less than .010. Meaning if you were to turn the crank .010 under, you'd be into the softer metal. I could be wrong though.

Oh yeah, are these steel nitrided or cast?
Old 01-08-2016, 09:52 AM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
93camaro_zzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not bad luck Ron. I would not buy a forged crank for your new setup. Stock crank works great, even for the power you are probably looking to make.
Old 01-08-2016, 10:12 AM
  #20  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

These cranks are nodular iron. I don't believe they are nitrided.
My builder says we can get it nitrided though.

That defect is weird. It will catch my fingernail.

I trust my guy. We will get it figured out.

No copper on the bearing. I looked at them with a microscope cause I'm a nerd and have one. 😊 Pretty interesting.


Quick Reply: 2 years, 80 passes L33 SBE teardown



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.