How well will a 7675 on3 single turbo work with my current setup?
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How well will a 7675 on3 single turbo work with my current setup?
Hey guys, I've got a 99' ls1 ta with torquer v3 cam, Prc 5.3 heads milled .020, a ported fast 92mm setup, ls7 clutch, 9" w/ 3.89's. Car makes 460/424 on a rich tune now. Thinking about scrapping my nitrous plans and going single turbo. Without changing anything, can I slap the turbo on and make good reliable power even though I'm relatively high compression? I'm about 11.1 roughly. I'd be totally new to boost and feel like I'll get greedy with the spray and blow my stock bottom end apart so I'm thinking this may be a better way to go. Thoughts?
#2
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Simpsonville, SC
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am finishing pulling the nitrous off my car tomorrow because I have a Huron Speed kit waiting to go on. Nitrous was ok but I want all the time power and not have to worry about filling the bottle all the time. Go boost
#3
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know I'll want the power all the time as well. I'm just curious how well the boost will work with my top end setup. I don't wanna go through the hassle of doing heads and cam again What is your top end set up?
#6
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow... Did the bottom end stay together? I would think at 12lbs plus already having heads and cam, that bottom end would be a ticking time bomb. I need my shortblock to stay together because when that time finally comes, it's gonna be a big cubic inch build, all forged. Lots of dough. I know I'm pushing the limits but I wanna get as close to that edge as I can without going over.
Trending Topics
#14
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, the consensus here seems to be that even with a high compression setup, I should not be afraid to throw some boost at it? Id be happy with low boost and high 500's for power but it looks like similar setups are going way over that and staying together. I always thought the stock bottom ends are good till about 525-550 rwhp.. Is there something about a turbo and the way the boost is introduced vs other methods of making more power that is letting the stock shortblock survive? Anyone else have a success or failure story with this turbo on a H/C/I setup?
#16
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm just gonna use the same 93 octane gas I always have. I don't know if I'd need a methanol setup to go with it or what the best option would be. There is e85 available around here also, just never thought about using it.
#18
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah ideally I'd like to just run 93 octane with really safe tune to preserve the bottom end. Also, not looking to go crazy from a budget perspective so I figure 5-8 lbs of boost maybe, safe afr and conservative timing. Whatever it makes, it makes. Anyway you look at it, it's gonna be a huge increase from what I currently have. Plus, I wanna be able to daily drive the car and still put the wife and kids into it and not worry about anything going wrong.
#19
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you for all the replies guys and your experiences. Some people have said that the 78/75 is too big for a 347 and could have a lot of lag? And possible issues with back pressure? I understand the lag part of it but not the back pressure or possible boost creep end of things. There is a On3 76/65 turbo, a little smaller. Would that be better? I'm still leaning towards the 78/75 but would like to hear some thoughts about these other issues. Thanks in advance.
#20
Thank you for all the replies guys and your experiences. Some people have said that the 78/75 is too big for a 347 and could have a lot of lag? And possible issues with back pressure? I understand the lag part of it but not the back pressure or possible boost creep end of things. There is a On3 76/65 turbo, a little smaller. Would that be better? I'm still leaning towards the 78/75 but would like to hear some thoughts about these other issues. Thanks in advance.