Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

How well will a 7675 on3 single turbo work with my current setup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2016, 04:36 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default How well will a 7675 on3 single turbo work with my current setup?

Hey guys, I've got a 99' ls1 ta with torquer v3 cam, Prc 5.3 heads milled .020, a ported fast 92mm setup, ls7 clutch, 9" w/ 3.89's. Car makes 460/424 on a rich tune now. Thinking about scrapping my nitrous plans and going single turbo. Without changing anything, can I slap the turbo on and make good reliable power even though I'm relatively high compression? I'm about 11.1 roughly. I'd be totally new to boost and feel like I'll get greedy with the spray and blow my stock bottom end apart so I'm thinking this may be a better way to go. Thoughts?
Old 03-10-2016, 07:08 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
99T/AMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Simpsonville, SC
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am finishing pulling the nitrous off my car tomorrow because I have a Huron Speed kit waiting to go on. Nitrous was ok but I want all the time power and not have to worry about filling the bottle all the time. Go boost
Old 03-10-2016, 07:44 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99T/AMAN
I am finishing pulling the nitrous off my car tomorrow because I have a Huron Speed kit waiting to go on. Nitrous was ok but I want all the time power and not have to worry about filling the bottle all the time. Go boost
I know I'll want the power all the time as well. I'm just curious how well the boost will work with my top end setup. I don't wanna go through the hassle of doing heads and cam again What is your top end set up?
Old 03-10-2016, 08:21 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
99T/AMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Simpsonville, SC
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by aaronware76
I know I'll want the power all the time as well. I'm just curious how well the boost will work with my top end setup. I don't wanna go through the hassle of doing heads and cam again What is your top end set up?
Still the same as my signature. I have a set of 317 heads to change to if I want but going to start with what I have and upgrade from there
Old 03-10-2016, 08:23 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
StangTamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I had a similar setup also, stock bottom end ls1 high compression, 9" Moser. On 91 and 50/50 meth the car made over 650 on that same turbo and 12 lbs of boost

Last edited by StangTamer; 03-10-2016 at 08:32 PM.
Old 03-10-2016, 09:40 PM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by StangTamer
I had a similar setup also, stock bottom end ls1 high compression, 9" Moser. On 91 and 50/50 meth the car made over 650 on that same turbo and 12 lbs of boost
Wow... Did the bottom end stay together? I would think at 12lbs plus already having heads and cam, that bottom end would be a ticking time bomb. I need my shortblock to stay together because when that time finally comes, it's gonna be a big cubic inch build, all forged. Lots of dough. I know I'm pushing the limits but I wanna get as close to that edge as I can without going over.
Old 03-10-2016, 10:03 PM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My bad, it's actually a 78/75 on3 turbo. Also, is that size good for stock cubes?
Old 03-10-2016, 10:46 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
StangTamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Bottom end held great, had ARP rod bolts is all. I think the 7875 will do awesome, I was going to pick one up for my Xtreme to see how it does but i just got a screaming deal on another 76. You'll like your setup, they're a different animal with some boost
Old 03-10-2016, 11:02 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
lmt0705's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: buffalo NY
Posts: 1,706
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Boost and nos!
Old 03-11-2016, 01:40 AM
  #10  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lmt0705
Boost and nos!
I figure 28lbs of boost with a 100 shot to spool the turbo up faster is the way to go. The bottom end will handle anything I throw at it! Good ole lmt0705 what do you think?
Old 03-11-2016, 02:56 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
lmt0705's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: buffalo NY
Posts: 1,706
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

2 100mm turbos and 2 stages! one 7 second pass and ill pick up the pistons when your done!
Old 03-11-2016, 03:07 PM
  #12  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

my truck made 700 tire unlocked 80e on pumpgas with a 6.0 and 7875
Old 03-11-2016, 03:32 PM
  #13  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lmt0705
2 100mm turbos and 2 stages! one 7 second pass and ill pick up the pistons when your done!
Better make that a 4 second eighth mile pass. It'll be scattered all over the track before the end of the quarter.
Old 03-11-2016, 03:40 PM
  #14  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So, the consensus here seems to be that even with a high compression setup, I should not be afraid to throw some boost at it? Id be happy with low boost and high 500's for power but it looks like similar setups are going way over that and staying together. I always thought the stock bottom ends are good till about 525-550 rwhp.. Is there something about a turbo and the way the boost is introduced vs other methods of making more power that is letting the stock shortblock survive? Anyone else have a success or failure story with this turbo on a H/C/I setup?
Old 03-11-2016, 04:15 PM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
FourG63 97GST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 295
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I did the same, LS6 10.5:1 compression nitrous car, I did change out the cam though.
what are you running for fuel? I'm on E85, so wasn't concerned about compression.
we have the technology. just pull some timing, and let the turbo do the work
Old 03-11-2016, 06:23 PM
  #16  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FourG63 97GST
I did the same, LS6 10.5:1 compression nitrous car, I did change out the cam though.
what are you running for fuel? I'm on E85, so wasn't concerned about compression.
we have the technology. just pull some timing, and let the turbo do the work
I'm just gonna use the same 93 octane gas I always have. I don't know if I'd need a methanol setup to go with it or what the best option would be. There is e85 available around here also, just never thought about using it.
Old 03-11-2016, 06:53 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
lmt0705's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: buffalo NY
Posts: 1,706
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Your limited by the stock short block so your not looking for Max power and a bunch of timing so e85 is not necessary and it's a big upgrade price tag. You need a lot more pump, injectors and fuel lines that are compatible with e85
Old 03-11-2016, 07:23 PM
  #18  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lmt0705
Your limited by the stock short block so your not looking for Max power and a bunch of timing so e85 is not necessary and it's a big upgrade price tag. You need a lot more pump, injectors and fuel lines that are compatible with e85
Yeah ideally I'd like to just run 93 octane with really safe tune to preserve the bottom end. Also, not looking to go crazy from a budget perspective so I figure 5-8 lbs of boost maybe, safe afr and conservative timing. Whatever it makes, it makes. Anyway you look at it, it's gonna be a huge increase from what I currently have. Plus, I wanna be able to daily drive the car and still put the wife and kids into it and not worry about anything going wrong.
Old 03-13-2016, 09:32 PM
  #19  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
aaronware76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lancaster ny
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thank you for all the replies guys and your experiences. Some people have said that the 78/75 is too big for a 347 and could have a lot of lag? And possible issues with back pressure? I understand the lag part of it but not the back pressure or possible boost creep end of things. There is a On3 76/65 turbo, a little smaller. Would that be better? I'm still leaning towards the 78/75 but would like to hear some thoughts about these other issues. Thanks in advance.
Old 03-13-2016, 11:03 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
 
IronBlocked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aaronware76
Thank you for all the replies guys and your experiences. Some people have said that the 78/75 is too big for a 347 and could have a lot of lag? And possible issues with back pressure? I understand the lag part of it but not the back pressure or possible boost creep end of things. There is a On3 76/65 turbo, a little smaller. Would that be better? I'm still leaning towards the 78/75 but would like to hear some thoughts about these other issues. Thanks in advance.
Backpressure/boostcreep will be achieved when you cant dump the exhaust gasses through the wg/turbine overspeeding the turbine, a smaller turbine 7665 will only make things worse, Matt's truck made 700 wit a 366 inch motor, your engine is smaller which makes things better for you, backpressure wise


Quick Reply: How well will a 7675 on3 single turbo work with my current setup?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.