BW S362 or S366 Sizing for Twins on 6.0. Please help!
#1
BW S362 or S366 Sizing for Twins on 6.0. Please help!
Hi!
I've been driving myself mad trying to reach the correct answer. I've reached out to a couple well-known vendors as well and had different advice from them regarding which twins to get, so i'll open it up to the public to hear your experiences. Here's my build plan:
1973 Camaro
6.0 lq4 sbe (for now, new forged build possible in future, probably less than 400ci)
4l80 w/single disc billet converter
92MM Holley Hi Ram w/ NW 92mm TB
Treadstone A/A intercooler
Transbrake
2 Step
Custom Cam
Magnafuel 4303
ID1700 or ID2000 injectors
e85 / Flex Fuel
Tial 44mm MV-R gates/50mm BOV
The primary goal of this car is to be a fun street car to take my kid in (he's 14months old and already has his own Recaro car seat haha). I want quick spool for the street, but I (like everyone else) want at least 1000rwhp capability for the future. I would still like to be able to go to the drag strip every couple months or so and lay out a good number.
So, with the same goals as many people, i'm looking for the right sized twins for my application. Here are a couple I was thinking of and discussed:
S362 - cast, 68mm turbine wheel - should spool quick, hear different opinions on rwhp capability
S366 - cast, 68mm turbine wheel - slower spool, definitely 1000rwhp capable with room to grow
S366 - sxe, billet, 73mm turbine - ? not sure how that would compare to the other two, I know the HP limit is higher than i'll be, but i'm curious how the spool is compared to the s362. Maybe the answer is a billet S366 /68mm turbine?
I'm open to suggestions, but I would like to keep it in the Borg family. I've had Borg before and was happy, now i'd like twins
The only other item is are the billet units worth the price of entry compared to the cast units for a street car that is mostly looking for good street manners? From what i've priced, it's over a 50% price increase. I'm not opposed to it, but it definitely hits the budget a bit harder
Blah! Too many options to have an awesome time!! Here are a few pics too!
Thanks,
Josh
I've been driving myself mad trying to reach the correct answer. I've reached out to a couple well-known vendors as well and had different advice from them regarding which twins to get, so i'll open it up to the public to hear your experiences. Here's my build plan:
1973 Camaro
6.0 lq4 sbe (for now, new forged build possible in future, probably less than 400ci)
4l80 w/single disc billet converter
92MM Holley Hi Ram w/ NW 92mm TB
Treadstone A/A intercooler
Transbrake
2 Step
Custom Cam
Magnafuel 4303
ID1700 or ID2000 injectors
e85 / Flex Fuel
Tial 44mm MV-R gates/50mm BOV
The primary goal of this car is to be a fun street car to take my kid in (he's 14months old and already has his own Recaro car seat haha). I want quick spool for the street, but I (like everyone else) want at least 1000rwhp capability for the future. I would still like to be able to go to the drag strip every couple months or so and lay out a good number.
So, with the same goals as many people, i'm looking for the right sized twins for my application. Here are a couple I was thinking of and discussed:
S362 - cast, 68mm turbine wheel - should spool quick, hear different opinions on rwhp capability
S366 - cast, 68mm turbine wheel - slower spool, definitely 1000rwhp capable with room to grow
S366 - sxe, billet, 73mm turbine - ? not sure how that would compare to the other two, I know the HP limit is higher than i'll be, but i'm curious how the spool is compared to the s362. Maybe the answer is a billet S366 /68mm turbine?
I'm open to suggestions, but I would like to keep it in the Borg family. I've had Borg before and was happy, now i'd like twins
The only other item is are the billet units worth the price of entry compared to the cast units for a street car that is mostly looking for good street manners? From what i've priced, it's over a 50% price increase. I'm not opposed to it, but it definitely hits the budget a bit harder
Blah! Too many options to have an awesome time!! Here are a few pics too!
Thanks,
Josh
#4
9 Second Club
S362FMW
Whilst the old heavy cast units can work too....I just see little point when the FMW's are only a little more, and a much better unit. They'll spool faster, flow more air and have better bearing systems.
It also uses a slightly smaller housing, which can make packaging a little easier.
Whilst the old heavy cast units can work too....I just see little point when the FMW's are only a little more, and a much better unit. They'll spool faster, flow more air and have better bearing systems.
It also uses a slightly smaller housing, which can make packaging a little easier.
Trending Topics
#9
S362FMW
Whilst the old heavy cast units can work too....I just see little point when the FMW's are only a little more, and a much better unit. They'll spool faster, flow more air and have better bearing systems.
It also uses a slightly smaller housing, which can make packaging a little easier.
Whilst the old heavy cast units can work too....I just see little point when the FMW's are only a little more, and a much better unit. They'll spool faster, flow more air and have better bearing systems.
It also uses a slightly smaller housing, which can make packaging a little easier.
#10
Odds are a 366 won't spool any different than a 362. 4mm on the inducer when the exducer is the same... just isnt enough to affect it.
do the S366's with the 68mm turbine wheels and a .88 housing.
do the S366's with the 68mm turbine wheels and a .88 housing.
#11
9 Second Club
#12
9 Second Club
The 362FMW is around 84mm ?
That's a good difference. Or have BW got their info wrong ?
#13
All I speak on are the cast wheel versions... the FMW wheels arent even worth considering.. and Yes there is a cast 62/63mm wheel. Depending where you look it up at is what size it is.
You're muddling comparison points all together when thats not what i was doing. I wasnt comparing exducers of the FMW to the other two... only the wheel design.
You're muddling comparison points all together when thats not what i was doing. I wasnt comparing exducers of the FMW to the other two... only the wheel design.
#15
9 Second Club
They are insanely cheap.
But to say the cast units are same design as the FMW's....I guess is just the same as saying every compressor wheel in the world is the same design.
The FMW/SXE compressor wheels are different than their cast counterparts though. And given they're smaller on both inducer and exducer for same airflow ratings, they're bound to spool faster in every case.
I really cant see any reason to consider the older cast units vs the more modern stuff, unless they are diabolically cheap. ( that isnt to say they arent solid performers though )
But to say the cast units are same design as the FMW's....I guess is just the same as saying every compressor wheel in the world is the same design.
The FMW/SXE compressor wheels are different than their cast counterparts though. And given they're smaller on both inducer and exducer for same airflow ratings, they're bound to spool faster in every case.
I really cant see any reason to consider the older cast units vs the more modern stuff, unless they are diabolically cheap. ( that isnt to say they arent solid performers though )