Pt7675cea claims 1200hp ?!
05-26-2017, 11:59 AM
#21
ive been 151 with a 7675
it only dynoed 740 hp
id think 800 is possible, but much more than that would probably be a ragged edge blow it up tune with backpressure through the roof
the 75mm turbine just isnt a good fit for the ci at hand
a t4 borg with a compact cover isnt much larger physically than the pt. mine bolted on with zero modifications other than changing the downpipe flange
it only dynoed 740 hp
id think 800 is possible, but much more than that would probably be a ragged edge blow it up tune with backpressure through the roof
the 75mm turbine just isnt a good fit for the ci at hand
a t4 borg with a compact cover isnt much larger physically than the pt. mine bolted on with zero modifications other than changing the downpipe flange
05-26-2017, 01:39 PM
#22
ive been 151 with a 7675
it only dynoed 740 hp
id think 800 is possible, but much more than that would probably be a ragged edge blow it up tune with backpressure through the roof
the 75mm turbine just isnt a good fit for the ci at hand
a t4 borg with a compact cover isnt much larger physically than the pt. mine bolted on with zero modifications other than changing the downpipe flange
it only dynoed 740 hp
id think 800 is possible, but much more than that would probably be a ragged edge blow it up tune with backpressure through the roof
the 75mm turbine just isnt a good fit for the ci at hand
a t4 borg with a compact cover isnt much larger physically than the pt. mine bolted on with zero modifications other than changing the downpipe flange
11-23-2017, 05:44 PM
#23
Sorry to resurrect this thread, but had a similar question. What about hp using the new Precision Gen 2 7685..1000-1100RWHP possible? The next size up would be the 8685, which I think would definitely work, but rather go with smallest turbo possible for response...this would be on a 6.2L motor.
11-23-2017, 08:16 PM
#24
Sorry to resurrect this thread, but had a similar question. What about hp using the new Precision Gen 2 7685..1000-1100RWHP possible? The next size up would be the 8685, which I think would definitely work, but rather go with smallest turbo possible for response...this would be on a 6.2L motor.