What intake is BEST for a LS turbo motor?
#21
TECH Addict
FWIW ,, many sanctioning bodies won't cert a chrome roll-bar, the chrome can hide cracks in the welds, just like FIA won't allow powder coated roll bars.. Some even down allow any paint..
Although,, I knew a guy though who got through tech with a PVC roll-bar sprayed with that really shiny chrome paint...
Although,, I knew a guy though who got through tech with a PVC roll-bar sprayed with that really shiny chrome paint...
#25
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
touch crowd, maybe that 6spd and 9X mm turbo left the theater... A Team G could be EFi, they make a bolt on throttle body for just that purpose ;-), Fi Tech, Atomic, Summit, Fast Efi and a few others make that very same deal... C & S make a really nice Carb good for maybe 1200 HP not sure it will make the whole 1500+
#27
Either a Cid intake, that work of art Panterra or if your cheap a Holley high ram. Anything else and it's going to choke those 255's on whatever block is underneath it.
#28
#29
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
Itb vol = 126%
Hi All, I will state a case from experience learned more than twenty years ago with customer John Mihovetz owner of Accufab.
He ran a Ford 4.6 1995 Mustang, a gift from the Fords.
He was a user of my ECU and a local CNC machine shop owner.
This 4.6 Twin Turbo had the OEM intake at first making 1400 HP at Westech. (bench)
I designed, he machined, a very nice ITB "style" intake manifold which he fit onto the car (no dyno)
I increased the fuel injector size and did a re-tune needed for the projected HP increase.
The car was race ready with the first pass having the tires "spin" mid track causing a loss of control, the car hitting the guard rail.
The most funny conversation occurred: "I do not care about the crash (minor) I was just delighted with the great power increase."
The Mustang engine was removed and the car went to the body shop.
The engine was then tested at Westech with 1800 HP now measured.
Today his Coyote makes 3000 HP (65.lbs).
Then some state a GM LS based engine cannot better that ?
Lance
He ran a Ford 4.6 1995 Mustang, a gift from the Fords.
He was a user of my ECU and a local CNC machine shop owner.
This 4.6 Twin Turbo had the OEM intake at first making 1400 HP at Westech. (bench)
I designed, he machined, a very nice ITB "style" intake manifold which he fit onto the car (no dyno)
I increased the fuel injector size and did a re-tune needed for the projected HP increase.
The car was race ready with the first pass having the tires "spin" mid track causing a loss of control, the car hitting the guard rail.
The most funny conversation occurred: "I do not care about the crash (minor) I was just delighted with the great power increase."
The Mustang engine was removed and the car went to the body shop.
The engine was then tested at Westech with 1800 HP now measured.
Today his Coyote makes 3000 HP (65.lbs).
Then some state a GM LS based engine cannot better that ?
Lance
#30
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Hi All, I will state a case from experience learned more than twenty years ago with customer John Mihovetz owner of Accufab.
He ran a Ford 4.6 1995 Mustang, a gift from the Fords.
He was a user of my ECU and a local CNC machine shop owner.
This 4.6 Twin Turbo had the OEM intake at first making 1400 HP at Westech. (bench)
I designed, he machined, a very nice ITB "style" intake manifold which he fit onto the car (no dyno)
I increased the fuel injector size and did a re-tune needed for the projected HP increase.
The car was race ready with the first pass having the tires "spin" mid track causing a loss of control, the car hitting the guard rail.
The most funny conversation occurred: "I do not care about the crash (minor) I was just delighted with the great power increase."
The Mustang engine was removed and the car went to the body shop.
The engine was then tested at Westech with 1800 HP now measured.
Today his Coyote makes 3000 HP (65.lbs).
Then some state a GM LS based engine cannot better that ?
Lance
He ran a Ford 4.6 1995 Mustang, a gift from the Fords.
He was a user of my ECU and a local CNC machine shop owner.
This 4.6 Twin Turbo had the OEM intake at first making 1400 HP at Westech. (bench)
I designed, he machined, a very nice ITB "style" intake manifold which he fit onto the car (no dyno)
I increased the fuel injector size and did a re-tune needed for the projected HP increase.
The car was race ready with the first pass having the tires "spin" mid track causing a loss of control, the car hitting the guard rail.
The most funny conversation occurred: "I do not care about the crash (minor) I was just delighted with the great power increase."
The Mustang engine was removed and the car went to the body shop.
The engine was then tested at Westech with 1800 HP now measured.
Today his Coyote makes 3000 HP (65.lbs).
Then some state a GM LS based engine cannot better that ?
Lance
#34
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermont
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi All, I will state a case from experience learned more than twenty years ago with customer John Mihovetz owner of Accufab.
He ran a Ford 4.6 1995 Mustang, a gift from the Fords.
He was a user of my ECU and a local CNC machine shop owner.
This 4.6 Twin Turbo had the OEM intake at first making 1400 HP at Westech. (bench)
I designed, he machined, a very nice ITB "style" intake manifold which he fit onto the car (no dyno)
I increased the fuel injector size and did a re-tune needed for the projected HP increase.
The car was race ready with the first pass having the tires "spin" mid track causing a loss of control, the car hitting the guard rail.
The most funny conversation occurred: "I do not care about the crash (minor) I was just delighted with the great power increase."
The Mustang engine was removed and the car went to the body shop.
The engine was then tested at Westech with 1800 HP now measured.
Today his Coyote makes 3000 HP (65.lbs).
Then some state a GM LS based engine cannot better that ?
Lance
He ran a Ford 4.6 1995 Mustang, a gift from the Fords.
He was a user of my ECU and a local CNC machine shop owner.
This 4.6 Twin Turbo had the OEM intake at first making 1400 HP at Westech. (bench)
I designed, he machined, a very nice ITB "style" intake manifold which he fit onto the car (no dyno)
I increased the fuel injector size and did a re-tune needed for the projected HP increase.
The car was race ready with the first pass having the tires "spin" mid track causing a loss of control, the car hitting the guard rail.
The most funny conversation occurred: "I do not care about the crash (minor) I was just delighted with the great power increase."
The Mustang engine was removed and the car went to the body shop.
The engine was then tested at Westech with 1800 HP now measured.
Today his Coyote makes 3000 HP (65.lbs).
Then some state a GM LS based engine cannot better that ?
Lance
#35
All jokes aside, I put one of those on my car two weeks ago. Forgot to update my sig, but I went to the track this past weekend, car went 5.68 @ 148 in the 1/8th. Car pulls wicked hard with the new intake.