LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion (https://ls1tech.com/forums/)
-   Forced Induction (https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction-9/)
-   -   Pro's and Con's to Speed Density Tuning on FI.. (https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/721482-pros-cons-speed-density-tuning-fi.html)

VINCE May 27, 2007 08:36 AM

Pro's and Con's to Speed Density Tuning on FI..
 
Just like the topic says.. In the future I might consider going 3 bar SD.

JMBLOWNWS6 May 27, 2007 08:46 AM

I am in SD 2 bar. Going to 3 bar with my new setup. I really dont have any complaints at all. It takes time to set it all up and build the proper tables but once its done it drives great and smooth. My idle locks in place with no surging or bucking. I will say that I have had to make changes in cold weather and hot weather. But other than that the OS's work very well for our cars. Its all in the amount of time and experience you have with tuning. That will be the key in order to a SD 2 or 3 bar car running correctly. We currently have my partners 2003 Z06 in 2 bar with 900 + to the wheels running very well. We have gone 500 mile road trips and it just drives so well and tame. Untill you smash the gas. It amazing how much power you can have and just get in the car and go. Hope that helps.

JMG

VINCE May 27, 2007 09:40 AM


Originally Posted by JMBLOWNWS6
I am in SD 2 bar. Going to 3 bar with my new setup. I really dont have any complaints at all. It takes time to set it all up and build the proper tables but once its done it drives great and smooth. My idle locks in place with no surging or bucking. I will say that I have had to make changes in cold weather and hot weather. But other than that the OS's work very well for our cars. Its all in the amount of time and experience you have with tuning. That will be the key in order to a SD 2 or 3 bar car running correctly. We currently have my partners 2003 Z06 in 2 bar with 900 + to the wheels running very well. We have gone 500 mile road trips and it just drives so well and tame. Untill you smash the gas. It amazing how much power you can have and just get in the car and go. Hope that helps.

JMG

What you just said is what I have heard as well. I have no intentions of pushing past 900rwhp. My clutch wont hold it and I dont think the rest of the drivetrain would last very long..

ChevyChad May 27, 2007 09:40 AM

The major disadvantage for me is that I don't do my own tuning. It takes many many hours/ days even to get the tune dialed in. If you are not doing your own tuning, you will be hard pressed to find a tuner who will do it for you, and then if you do, it will cost a LOT of coin.

JMBLOWNWS6 May 27, 2007 09:46 AM


Originally Posted by VINCE
What you just said is what I have heard as well. I have no intentions of pushing past 900rwhp. My clutch wont hold it and I dont think the rest of the drivetrain would last very long..

Are you doing your tuning?

ss53mech May 27, 2007 10:14 AM

I got a newbie question on this, speed density versus what? By speed density I assume you are talking about using, the maf setup as opposed to map/tps.

BoostedWS7 May 27, 2007 10:17 AM

harris speedworks jus did a 2 bar on my setup. thing has great manners and lots of power when ya mash on it. much more reliable than the MAF.

longrange4u May 27, 2007 10:21 AM

I have heard of MAF-T and some other things too... how do they compare to SD?

JMBLOWNWS6 May 27, 2007 10:24 AM


Originally Posted by longrange4u
I have heard of MAF-T and some other things too... how do they compare to SD?

Maf-t extends the tables. So its like running SD but still using the maf.

JMBLOWNWS6 May 27, 2007 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by ss53mech
I got a newbie question on this, speed density versus what? By speed density I assume you are talking about using, the maf setup as opposed to map/tps.

You are removing the MAF completely. Building the maps off of Map,IAT's and spark tables etc. Of course on my partners Z06 we left the maf on due to the fact the IAT is with the maf. Then we had to send off the 0S to have the reduced engine power taken out.

longrange4u May 27, 2007 10:26 AM

Any drawbacks or benifits to that vs: SD?

JMBLOWNWS6 May 27, 2007 10:29 AM


Originally Posted by longrange4u
Any drawbacks or benifits to that vs: SD?

Your still using the Maf to compensate in whatever atomsphere you are in. I am no pro with the Maf-T. SD works well. Its all in what your Tuning/Tuner can and cant do. Im sure Slowhawk,Harlan or Kyle can fill you in some more.

Slowhawk May 27, 2007 11:07 AM

For small setups like 8lbs of boost you really don't need SD. We ussually switch to SD on 10+lbs with Cams or Turbo cars. SD is also better with low vacuum motor's from big Cams. Setting it up is not hard but tuning it in takes time.We ussually take 2-3 days of driving,Tried a load dyno but the tune was too far off on the road after. I do suggest you run a permanent wideband if in SD though.

bhz28 May 27, 2007 11:30 AM

ok well I am rather new to FI and SD tuning, but I am building a turbo set up and was considering going with a SD tune. What kind of up keep on the tune is there? (do you have to adjust things according to temp, etc) What is a estimate on price for this kind of tune as I would not be doing it myself? What is 2 bar and 3 bar SD and the difference? Any other input that would help me out I would appreciate. Thanks.

SS101 May 27, 2007 11:51 AM

i'm assuming by maf-t you mean maf translator...which ones are you guys using?? are there any really good ones out there??

qqwqeqwrqwqtq May 27, 2007 02:30 PM

I have tuned many cars using HP tuners 2/3 bar OS. As far as tuning is concerned it is my favorite thing to work with and IMHO the only proper way to accurately tune a forced induction car capable of maxing out the MAF sensor.

Driveability is exceptional, much better than the MAF. Change your boost level on the fly and fueling is perfect at any setting. Just make sure you have the proper octane fuel in the tank for a given power level.

Once tuning is completed no further changes or adjustments are necessary. Their are millions of cars on the road built and tuned speed density from the factory. They (like the LS1) do not need to be re-flashed when the weather changes.

Boostaholic May 27, 2007 02:52 PM

I am SD w/ BS3 and it works great

JMBLOWNWS6 May 27, 2007 02:57 PM


Originally Posted by INTMD8
I have tuned many cars using HP tuners 2/3 bar OS. As far as tuning is concerned it is my favorite thing to work with and IMHO the only proper way to accurately tune a forced induction car capable of maxing out the MAF sensor.

Driveability is exceptional, much better than the MAF. Change your boost level on the fly and fueling is perfect at any setting. Just make sure you have the proper octane fuel in the tank for a given power level.

Once tuning is completed no further changes or adjustments are necessary. Their are millions of cars on the road built and tuned speed density from the factory. They (like the LS1) do not need to be re-flashed when the weather changes.

The changes I make are minor. But it got so cold here this year I had to make a different tune for startups. BTW thanks for the cam info. Looks like Ill be giving you a call. :judge:

mdhmi May 27, 2007 04:29 PM

I'm sure SD is great when done right - but FWIW I haven't had any issues with my MAF setup at 13-15 psi boost. My car runs mid 10's @ 138 MPH without meth in the summer heat on pump fuel so I can't complain.

VINCE May 27, 2007 05:00 PM


Originally Posted by mdhmi
I'm sure SD is great when done right - but FWIW I haven't had any issues with my MAF setup at 13-15 psi boost. My car runs mid 10's @ 138 MPH without meth in the summer heat on pump fuel so I can't complain.

Your car is just flat out fast Mark. You are 1 bar right?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands