Fueling & Injection Fuel Pumps | Injectors | Rails | Regulators | Tanks

Is corvette fuel filter/regulator a straight swap to Fbody?

Old 07-12-2017, 09:13 PM
  #41  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

We are trying to change things up and add parts instead of waiting for them to be developed.
Old 07-25-2017, 07:31 PM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ls1charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
We are trying to change things up and add parts instead of waiting for them to be developed.
PM sent
Old 08-02-2017, 02:54 PM
  #43  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

We will have our mentioned kits in about a week and a half to 2 weeks. We will also have them listed also with actual pics.
Old 08-04-2017, 04:48 AM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ls1charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
We will have our mentioned kits in about a week and a half to 2 weeks. We will also have them listed also with actual pics.
what is the difference between a stock fbody regulator and the vette one, functionally? In other words, what psi does the stock Fbody regulate to?
Old 08-04-2017, 09:01 AM
  #45  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

You will see them both operate between 55 and 60 psi.
Old 08-04-2017, 10:14 AM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ls1charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
You will see them both operate between 55 and 60 psi.
I would hope so... but does that mean the vette reg can regulate a higher psi then stock Fbody cause that one fails at an unknown psi apparently
Old 08-04-2017, 10:31 AM
  #47  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Neither one actively adjusts pressure.
I haven't heard of the fbody failing at an unknown pressure either. It does become a restriction at one point, but they are not too bad up to the mid 400s at the wheels. Trying to run a 340 and e85 through the fbody ones would be an issue but the 255 doesnt have an issue mostly.
Ill post some more info on how the computer tries to adjust fuel pressure so to speak in a different way in a bit. Gotta find my notes.
Old 08-04-2017, 11:04 AM
  #48  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,862
Received 3,017 Likes on 2,348 Posts
Default

My understanding of most pressure regulators is they put a "cap" on the pressure, not allowing it to exceed a known limit, much like an oil pressure relief valve, only in the fuel regulator's case the excess is plumbed to the fuel tank.
Old 08-04-2017, 11:14 AM
  #49  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Not really. they don't release the fuel into a bypass or puke it back into the tank, it just provides a metered restriction on the line which causes the pressure in the first place. The vacuum operated ones work a bit different where they actively try to keep the pressure differential based off manifold vacuum the same. It is fairly seamless so you cant really see it even with a fuel pressure gauge. The none sourced regulators use a different way of supplying fuel for demand. like i said ill post that in a bit.
The new vehicles fitted with fpcm or fscm use pulse width modulation or voltage increase to change the output of the pump and accordingly the flow rate of the fuel injectors. But the fbodys and c5s def dont do that.

Last edited by tech@WS6store; 08-04-2017 at 11:20 AM.
Old 08-08-2017, 08:38 PM
  #50  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

From what I see of the F-car fuel system, the T-fitting just before the fuel filter goes to the FPR in the tank (near the top of the fuel pump module), it dumps fuel back into the tank thru here; this FPR is un-referenced, meaning it references whatever pressure is in the air space in fuel tank (which is close to barometric pressure otherwise the fuel tank would damage itself)... so this FPR works just like a MAP-referenced FPR except that the reference is constant.

( edit: I didn't hyperlink/underline those words, the forum software did that )
Old 08-08-2017, 08:52 PM
  #51  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

A software bias compensates the injector on-time because the fuel pressure regulator is not referenced to manifold vacuum. The injector pulse width varies with the signal from the MAP sensor.

^ From gm manual on the 99-02 fbodys.

Thats somewhat how all inj pw works but this is an extra overlay factor
Old 08-09-2017, 05:58 AM
  #52  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ls1charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Anybody know how much pump you can run through the vette reg before it's no longer regulating at the appropriate psi?
Old 08-09-2017, 05:32 PM
  #53  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
A software bias compensates the injector on-time because the fuel pressure regulator is not referenced to manifold vacuum. The injector pulse width varies with the signal from the MAP sensor.

^ From gm manual on the 99-02 fbodys.

Thats somewhat how all inj pw works but this is an extra overlay factor
yes, that is why the IFR table is sloped (actually goes as squareroot of pressure), this is how the PCM compensates for variation in MAP (i.e. accounts for pressure difference across injector as MAP varies).
Old 08-09-2017, 05:36 PM
  #54  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Right. So it somewhat guesses what is going on but uses a few tables so its a pretty good educated guess...although it doesnt know true fuel pressure. That would be good, but run into issues as well. I mean just look at ford. Ha.
Old 08-09-2017, 06:46 PM
  #55  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

lol, ford, lol.
Old 08-13-2017, 09:57 AM
  #56  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
A software bias compensates the injector on-time because the fuel pressure regulator is not referenced to manifold vacuum. The injector pulse width varies with the signal from the MAP sensor.

^ From gm manual on the 99-02 fbodys.

Thats somewhat how all inj pw works but this is an extra overlay factor
the way its done is fine when atmospheric pressure is the highest pressure in the intake manifold. Once you run 60psi of boost pressure you lose fuel at 60psi of fuel pressure. So getting anywhere even close to 60psi (lets say 30psi of boost) and now 60psi of fuel pressure is not acceptable in most cases.

The software bias is limited. It can only go so far.
Old 08-13-2017, 04:52 PM
  #57  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

For boost you really should use MAP referenced FPR... this means removing the in-tank FPR and installing a new FPR at the rails, and installing a return line.
Old 08-13-2017, 05:05 PM
  #58  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,658
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Being more realistic, there are many MANY builds out there running boost with no issues.

There is more than one way to accomplish the end product.

No maggie kit uses a fpr on the ls apps. No reg procharger kit either. They work just fine.

Is it better to use a boost ref/rising rate fpr? Yes. But its not going to kill anything otherwise honestly, esp at the normal levels these systems are ran.

60psi isnt realistic and neither is 30. Nor is 30 anywhere close to 60.

The software is pretty accurate and grows with the tune as well. This is not some import with a limited range.
Old 08-14-2017, 10:34 AM
  #59  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
Being more realistic, there are many MANY builds out there running boost with no issues.

There is more than one way to accomplish the end product.

No maggie kit uses a fpr on the ls apps. No reg procharger kit either. They work just fine.

Is it better to use a boost ref/rising rate fpr? Yes. But its not going to kill anything otherwise honestly, esp at the normal levels these systems are ran.

60psi isnt realistic and neither is 30. Nor is 30 anywhere close to 60.

The software is pretty accurate and grows with the tune as well. This is not some import with a limited range.
1. Just because 'they' make entry level kits that work with a base of 60psi doesn't make it a 'great design'.
It only barely passes 'legit' because the power output is low enough to pass.

2. with 30psi of boost and 60psi of fuel pressure, you lose half of your injector.

With 15psi of boost (a reasonable number) and 60psi of fuel pressure you are cutting 25% of your injector away. Still not a "desirable" situation to be in since now you need oversized injectors by 25% which hurts idle control quality depending on the size of injector. You can buy those 25% larger injectors, or, you can raise the pressure 1:1 with boost pressure, and get back that 25% of your injector that went missing. Last time I checked, 25% is a huge chunk of injector to be plus or minus. Combined with the fact the pump will probably last longer with the increased 25% injector output (due to referencing vacuum which brings down pressure at other times) makes it far more desirable as a solution.


3. the range isn't in the software, the range is in the injector. All computers work in the same based principle, stand-alone to stock, for every engine, they all use a trigger system and have something called duty cycle for the injector. You lose software bias when the software increases duty cycle in order to compensate for low fuel pressure. Once duty cycle hits 100% thats it- you are out.


cliffs;
referenced fuel pressure allows us to run smaller injectors and get the same fueling in forced induction applications
referenced fuel pressure may extend fuel pump longevity by reducing pressure during vacuum situaitons (in any application)
referenced fuel pressure gives more headroom for duty cycle at the injector during boost situations
Old 08-14-2017, 10:58 AM
  #60  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Bat. ****. Crazy.

I'm surprised the mods haven't cracked down on this guy. Just for ruining the site if nothing else.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Is corvette fuel filter/regulator a straight swap to Fbody?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.