Adjustable Fuel pressure regulator (AFPR) explanation ...
#1
Adjustable Fuel pressure regulator (AFPR) explanation ...
Hi ! I have a returnless style fuel system with a OEM fuel pressure regulator before the fuel rail (in fact it's in the fuel tank). Stock pressure is constant @ 60 PSI whatever at idle, cruising or WOT. My car is now being modded roughly with 25% more power than stock, so I upgraded to bigger injectors. But my air fuel ratio is way too rich under hard acceleration at mid rpm's, long term fuel trims when cruising are -15 to -20%. Since the boost comes way sooner (because of my mods; smaller pulley on the supercharger) the PCM throws a lot of fuel. Can I use an AFPR between my OEM fuel pressure regulator and the fuel rail ? Why ? Do I need a return line ? Why ? Thanks ! I also purchased an Apexi S-AFC2 to tune the engine with the load (MAP) factor ... installation soon.
#2
How did you choose that size injector? They are really big for a 2L car. Still, you should be able to tune them. What were the stock injectors?
If you add an AFPR you need to add a return line, because that's how the bypass regulators works - by bleeding off extra fuel and sending it back to the tank. With the stock system pumping out a constant 60, you should use a boost/vacuum referenced regulator to lower your pressures at cruise (hi vacuum), maybe down to 45psi, and increase it proportionally to your boost levels, maybe back up to the stock 60 under max boost.
Your car is trying to compensate for the monster injectors but probably is not allowed enough of a range to adjust it back into anywhere near spec. I suspect your stock injectors were like 22 or 26#, right?
Are you following a tried and true recipe here, or just throwing stuff from the parts catalog together and hoping to make it work? Have you ever seen a car with the same mods as you perform correctly? What are your HP goals?
Jim
If you add an AFPR you need to add a return line, because that's how the bypass regulators works - by bleeding off extra fuel and sending it back to the tank. With the stock system pumping out a constant 60, you should use a boost/vacuum referenced regulator to lower your pressures at cruise (hi vacuum), maybe down to 45psi, and increase it proportionally to your boost levels, maybe back up to the stock 60 under max boost.
Your car is trying to compensate for the monster injectors but probably is not allowed enough of a range to adjust it back into anywhere near spec. I suspect your stock injectors were like 22 or 26#, right?
Are you following a tried and true recipe here, or just throwing stuff from the parts catalog together and hoping to make it work? Have you ever seen a car with the same mods as you perform correctly? What are your HP goals?
Jim
Last edited by DeltaT; 04-11-2006 at 01:42 AM.
#3
Stock Cobalt SS Supercharged injectors are 34 lb/hr (rated at 43,5 PSI). Since I'm now modded for roughly 25% more WHP than stock (on the same Mustang dyno), I choose the 42lb injectors. Peak whp is roughly 270 whp on a Dynojet.
There are some other street driven Cobalt with mods like mine and my HP goal is not more than 300 whp for now.
There are some other street driven Cobalt with mods like mine and my HP goal is not more than 300 whp for now.
#6
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
Originally Posted by jmc007
I have a returnless style fuel system with a OEM fuel pressure regulator before the fuel rail (in fact it's in the fuel tank).
#7
Originally Posted by DeltaT
Cool. Will the tranny hold up to those power levels?
Jim
Jim
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Nasty N8
You will need the fuel tables in the computer recalibrated for the extra flow.
nate
nate
#9
Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
im not familar with cobalts but our cars regulator is in the tank, only one fuel line in the engine bay, and yet we still have a return system... so u should double check that yours is definitely returnless.
I was wondering if an adjustable fuel pressure regulator can be used after the OEM regulator ... not to raise the boost, but to lower it at low and mid rpm's.
#10
This GM Canada site calls out the returnless fuel system just for the low end Cobalt:
http://www.gmcanada.com/english_migr.../coba_opti.jsp
Doesn't mean they didn't do a typo (I see at least 2 on the page, where they swapped pounds for kilos of car weight), but it is suspicious. Having a deadhead system makes more sense on an econobox than a blown mini-racer...
You need to look at your fuel tank and see how many lines are attached to the pump mount. Should have at least 3 lines: Output, Vent and Return. It's possible they will have another for emissions stuff like a vent canister line or something.
The return line and regulator could be in the middle of the fuel rail, well hidden. Or the regulator could be mounted off the engine, but nearby.
FYI - the GM HP rating is engine HP, not whp.
UPDATE: They do mention the returnless fuel system under the Emissions category for all three models, so I guess you have it.
Jim
http://www.gmcanada.com/english_migr.../coba_opti.jsp
Doesn't mean they didn't do a typo (I see at least 2 on the page, where they swapped pounds for kilos of car weight), but it is suspicious. Having a deadhead system makes more sense on an econobox than a blown mini-racer...
You need to look at your fuel tank and see how many lines are attached to the pump mount. Should have at least 3 lines: Output, Vent and Return. It's possible they will have another for emissions stuff like a vent canister line or something.
The return line and regulator could be in the middle of the fuel rail, well hidden. Or the regulator could be mounted off the engine, but nearby.
FYI - the GM HP rating is engine HP, not whp.
UPDATE: They do mention the returnless fuel system under the Emissions category for all three models, so I guess you have it.
Jim
Last edited by DeltaT; 04-11-2006 at 05:24 PM.
#11
You may have only one return regulator in a system. If you install a second one the system pressure will default to the lower pressure. Now if by chance your system is like a "returnless" Fbody and you accidentally hooked the return from the new regulator up to the return bleed line off the fuel filter you'd be back up to 60 psi again because you've closed the loop back to the factory regulator and the return line would fill and pressurize to the intank regulator setting.
Clear as mud? Best you could do now is install an aftermarket regulator using a dedicated return line and reference it to manifold vacuum to lower pressure at cruise if you're not able to get into the pcm.
Clear as mud? Best you could do now is install an aftermarket regulator using a dedicated return line and reference it to manifold vacuum to lower pressure at cruise if you're not able to get into the pcm.
#12
Originally Posted by DeltaT
This GM Canada site calls out the returnless fuel system just for the low end Cobalt:
http://www.gmcanada.com/english_migr.../coba_opti.jsp
Doesn't mean they didn't do a typo (I see at least 2 on the page, where they swapped pounds for kilos of car weight), but it is suspicious. Having a deadhead system makes more sense on an econobox than a blown mini-racer...
You need to look at your fuel tank and see how many lines are attached to the pump mount. Should have at least 3 lines: Output, Vent and Return. It's possible they will have another for emissions stuff like a vent canister line or something.
The return line and regulator could be in the middle of the fuel rail, well hidden. Or the regulator could be mounted off the engine, but nearby.
FYI - the GM HP rating is engine HP, not whp.
UPDATE: They do mention the returnless fuel system under the Emissions category for all three models, so I guess you have it.
Jim
http://www.gmcanada.com/english_migr.../coba_opti.jsp
Doesn't mean they didn't do a typo (I see at least 2 on the page, where they swapped pounds for kilos of car weight), but it is suspicious. Having a deadhead system makes more sense on an econobox than a blown mini-racer...
You need to look at your fuel tank and see how many lines are attached to the pump mount. Should have at least 3 lines: Output, Vent and Return. It's possible they will have another for emissions stuff like a vent canister line or something.
The return line and regulator could be in the middle of the fuel rail, well hidden. Or the regulator could be mounted off the engine, but nearby.
FYI - the GM HP rating is engine HP, not whp.
UPDATE: They do mention the returnless fuel system under the Emissions category for all three models, so I guess you have it.
Jim
PLus the fact that I do have the Cobalt service manual set, and it's cleary written how it works and it's a returnless. LOL there is no hidden other fuel line; thrust me i get the fuel rail removed twice :o).
About the HP rating, I kbow GM rate engine BHP, but I did get my car dynoed at least 10 runs on an accurate Mustang dyno.
#13
[QUOTE=andereck]You may have only one return regulator in a system. If you install a second one the system pressure will default to the lower pressure. Now if by chance your system is like a "returnless" Fbody and you accidentally hooked the return from the new regulator up to the return bleed line off the fuel filter you'd be back up to 60 psi again because you've closed the loop back to the factory regulator and the return line would fill and pressurize to the intank regulator setting.
Clear as mud? Best you could do now is install an aftermarket regulator using a dedicated return line and reference it to manifold vacuum to lower pressure at cruise if you're not able to get into the pcm.[/QUOTE]
OK that's what I plan to do ... Any thought guys for a good (and not too expensive) adjustable fuel pressure regulator ?
Clear as mud? Best you could do now is install an aftermarket regulator using a dedicated return line and reference it to manifold vacuum to lower pressure at cruise if you're not able to get into the pcm.[/QUOTE]
OK that's what I plan to do ... Any thought guys for a good (and not too expensive) adjustable fuel pressure regulator ?
#15
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
Originally Posted by andereck
13105 Aeromotive is a choice. Its compact and will adjust up to from 30 to 70-75 psi.
#16
Best you could do now is install an aftermarket regulator using a dedicated return line and reference it to manifold vacuum to lower pressure at cruise if you're not able to get into the pcm.
Jim
#20
Originally Posted by DeltaT
I use an Aeromotive as well.
Does it means for each PSI of boost, the fuel pressure goes up by one PSI ? (Example : A FPR set to base 40 PSI will run at 50 PSI when 10 PSI of manifold boost).
Or it means the fuel pressure raise at the same time than the boost RATIO ? (Example : A FPR set to base 40 PSI will runs at 67 PSI when 10 PSI of manifold boost).