UK '99 Z28 A4 with unknown super tall gears...
#1
UK '99 Z28 A4 with unknown super tall gears...
Hi all, my first post here, but I'd like to think it's an interesting one. So I went to see a Z28 over here in the UK a couple of weeks ago and whilst on the test drive the guy selling it commented that the speedo under-reads and blamed the tyre sizes. I liked the car and bought it but after a bit of digging it turns out that the owner before him had a place in France and used to like driving the Camaro down there (why wouldn't he), so for better gas mileage he fitted even taller gears than the stock 2.73. I've not had a chance to get the car to a garage to work out what gears it's running but, roughly speaking, 68mph on the speedo equates to a real 76mph, which I worked out to be a 12% difference or thereabouts. Does that mean that my gears are 12% taller than the stock 2.73, which would put them at approximately 2.43, or am I way off on my calculations?
Also, where do I go from here as far as gears are concerned? I'd like to turn it into a fun weekend toy and while I know a 3600 stall with the 2.73 gears is a good combo, are my current gears just too tall? Any advice welcome, thanks!
Also, where do I go from here as far as gears are concerned? I'd like to turn it into a fun weekend toy and while I know a 3600 stall with the 2.73 gears is a good combo, are my current gears just too tall? Any advice welcome, thanks!
#2
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (26)
Your figures are correct by the info given... A 2.43 gear set in the rear with the speedo still calibrated for the original 2.73 would give the approximate 68mph reading at 76mph.
As far as what gear is good for you depends on use, but by the definition of "weekend toy" I would assume a more aggressive gear like a 3.42 or 3.73 will work great.
As far as what gear is good for you depends on use, but by the definition of "weekend toy" I would assume a more aggressive gear like a 3.42 or 3.73 will work great.
#3
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,038
Likes: 0
Received 1,488 Likes
on
1,071 Posts
So based on those figures I'm guessing it's probably a 2.41 gear then? I don't recall a 2.43 ever being offered for this rear, but 2.41s were a common ratio in the '80s for the 7.5" 10-bolt behind a TH200 trans and NA 3.8L V6 (such as in G-bodies.)
In any event, I wouldn't keep these. 2.73 with a 3600 stall is a fine combo and if yours still had the factory installed 2.73s I would leave them and certainly do a stall before even considering a gear swap. But with ~2.41s, the fact the speedo is off and requires a tune anyway, and that the rear has already been messed with previously, I would swap them out - and at that point you might as well consider a 3.42 at least.
In any event, I wouldn't keep these. 2.73 with a 3600 stall is a fine combo and if yours still had the factory installed 2.73s I would leave them and certainly do a stall before even considering a gear swap. But with ~2.41s, the fact the speedo is off and requires a tune anyway, and that the rear has already been messed with previously, I would swap them out - and at that point you might as well consider a 3.42 at least.
#4
Your figures are correct by the info given... A 2.43 gear set in the rear with the speedo still calibrated for the original 2.73 would give the approximate 68mph reading at 76mph.
As far as what gear is good for you depends on use, but by the definition of "weekend toy" I would assume a more aggressive gear like a 3.42 or 3.73 will work great.
As far as what gear is good for you depends on use, but by the definition of "weekend toy" I would assume a more aggressive gear like a 3.42 or 3.73 will work great.
I had been thinking of going 3.42 initially, though people were saying that a stall and 2.73 is a good combo, but I'm wondering if a stall will be enough to wake up the 2.43. I get the feeling going to 3.42 would make the car feel a lot more exciting and fun to drive and I can stall it at a later date.
#5
So based on those figures I'm guessing it's probably a 2.41 gear then? I don't recall a 2.43 ever being offered for this rear, but 2.41s were a common ratio in the '80s for the 7.5" 10-bolt behind a TH200 trans and NA 3.8L V6 (such as in G-bodies.)
In any event, I wouldn't keep these. 2.73 with a 3600 stall is a fine combo and if yours still had the factory installed 2.73s I would leave them and certainly do a stall before even considering a gear swap. But with ~2.41s, the fact the speedo is off and requires a tune anyway, and that the rear has already been messed with previously, I would swap them out - and at that point you might as well consider a 3.42 at least.
In any event, I wouldn't keep these. 2.73 with a 3600 stall is a fine combo and if yours still had the factory installed 2.73s I would leave them and certainly do a stall before even considering a gear swap. But with ~2.41s, the fact the speedo is off and requires a tune anyway, and that the rear has already been messed with previously, I would swap them out - and at that point you might as well consider a 3.42 at least.
Funny, when I went out with the guy I bought it from and floored it, he looked at me from the passenger seat and said "Yeah, what do you think of that?!" with a grin on his face and I was just thinking something is not right here because this does not feel anywhere near as quick as I was expecting...
Any particular gear set you guys would recommend? I spotted the Summit Racing 2 Series 3.42s for $144, which seems pretty good?
#7
Trending Topics
#10
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,038
Likes: 0
Received 1,488 Likes
on
1,071 Posts
I had been thinking of going 3.42 initially, though people were saying that a stall and 2.73 is a good combo, but I'm wondering if a stall will be enough to wake up the 2.43. I get the feeling going to 3.42 would make the car feel a lot more exciting and fun to drive and I can stall it at a later date.
BUT, again, since you already have an issue with the speedo, and unknown quality of gears and install (though I guess it must be decent if you're not having any issues with noise), and the fact they are only ~2.41s rather than 2.73s, I would probably do something with the gears first or, if you have the cash, just do gears and stall together and get it tuned once.
#11
If it still had the factory installed 2.73s and the rear was in perfect working order, then yes I would definitely recommend a ~3600 stall swap (something high end such as Yank or Vig) before even considering touching the gears. To me, a 2.73 + 3600 stall setup is considerably more fun (and significantly quicker, all else equal) than a stock stall and 3.42s/3.73s - so if you're only going to do one at a time then go with the stall before gears IMO.
BUT, again, since you already have an issue with the speedo, and unknown quality of gears and install (though I guess it must be decent if you're not having any issues with noise), and the fact they are only ~2.41s rather than 2.73s, I would probably do something with the gears first or, if you have the cash, just do gears and stall together and get it tuned once.
BUT, again, since you already have an issue with the speedo, and unknown quality of gears and install (though I guess it must be decent if you're not having any issues with noise), and the fact they are only ~2.41s rather than 2.73s, I would probably do something with the gears first or, if you have the cash, just do gears and stall together and get it tuned once.
I had a question about reprogramming the speedo for the new gears - what's the cheapest/easiest way to do it? Here in the UK I haven't got any Chevy dealers anywhere, just GM/Vauxhall and I wager none of them have ever seen a 4th Gen Camaro and I wouldn't trust them to do anything.
#12
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
tuning for the gear ratio change is a simple change in the tune the big question is who in your area would have tuning software such as hp tuners or efi live. What is around you for GM performance enthusiasts ? corvette's duramax diesels , etc...it sounds like your saying theres no f body scene over there so you need to figure out if any gm late model tuning activity is in reasonable distance from you on any platform.
#13
tuning for the gear ratio change is a simple change in the tune the big question is who in your area would have tuning software such as hp tuners or efi live. What is around you for GM performance enthusiasts ? corvette's duramax diesels , etc...it sounds like your saying theres no f body scene over there so you need to figure out if any gm late model tuning activity is in reasonable distance from you on any platform.
#14
TECH Enthusiast
Realistically if you're going to spend that much, you'd be better off grabbing your own copy of HPtuners.
And in my opinion you'd enjoy the 3600 stall with the current gears (which are not helping your case whatsoever) vs the stock stall with a lower gear for the time being if you absolutely can't do both at the same time.
And in my opinion you'd enjoy the 3600 stall with the current gears (which are not helping your case whatsoever) vs the stock stall with a lower gear for the time being if you absolutely can't do both at the same time.
#15
Realistically if you're going to spend that much, you'd be better off grabbing your own copy of HPtuners.
And in my opinion you'd enjoy the 3600 stall with the current gears (which are not helping your case whatsoever) vs the stock stall with a lower gear for the time being if you absolutely can't do both at the same time.
And in my opinion you'd enjoy the 3600 stall with the current gears (which are not helping your case whatsoever) vs the stock stall with a lower gear for the time being if you absolutely can't do both at the same time.
#16
TECH Junkie
You will absolutely hate it imo. The car will feel loose as **** with a 3600 and 2.41's. If ya ask me do the 3.73's now and go from there. Going from 2.41's to 3.73's will massively wake your car up.
#17
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
2.41 should be pretty similar to 273's with a stall only 10-12% difference in ratio , either one will feel loose but I still think the gain would be large with a stall if drag racing it
but if your not looking for drag racing results that then the gears will feel better as far as driving on the street. Go 373 or 390 and you will be happy and leave enough room for decent traps if you taking modding past the bolt on level.
It sounds like you will be doing both gears and stall in the not to distant future , I don't think a handheld will help you much with the stall and bolt ons to follow.
but if your not looking for drag racing results that then the gears will feel better as far as driving on the street. Go 373 or 390 and you will be happy and leave enough room for decent traps if you taking modding past the bolt on level.
It sounds like you will be doing both gears and stall in the not to distant future , I don't think a handheld will help you much with the stall and bolt ons to follow.
#18
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,038
Likes: 0
Received 1,488 Likes
on
1,071 Posts
2.41 should be pretty similar to 273's with a stall only 10-12% difference in ratio , either one will feel loose but I still think the gain would be large with a stall if drag racing it
but if your not looking for drag racing results that then the gears will feel better as far as driving on the street. Go 373 or 390 and you will be happy and leave enough room for decent traps if you taking modding past the bolt on level.
It sounds like you will be doing both gears and stall in the not to distant future , I don't think a handheld will help you much with the stall and bolt ons to follow.
but if your not looking for drag racing results that then the gears will feel better as far as driving on the street. Go 373 or 390 and you will be happy and leave enough room for decent traps if you taking modding past the bolt on level.
It sounds like you will be doing both gears and stall in the not to distant future , I don't think a handheld will help you much with the stall and bolt ons to follow.
Don't get me wrong, I'm almost always the guy who will advise people to forget about gear swaps until after they've experienced the road manners of a higher stall and THEN decide whether gears are worth it for them - but in this case I think it would probably be best to do the gear swap first if both can't be done together. Additionally, the shift points are probably less than ideal with a 2.73 tune and 2.41 gears, adding a stall into this mix might make it even worse, and it really doesn't make sense to tune for the 2.41s when the plan is to swap them out later anyway.
#20
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,038
Likes: 0
Received 1,488 Likes
on
1,071 Posts
Not under normal circumstances with a 2.73 or 3.23. The explosive acceleration of the stall upgrade greatly eclipses the feel of a common 3.73 swap with the stock stall, and a high quality converter in the mid-3k range won't feel too loose with either stock ratio. But the 2.41s and tuning issues change the situation in this case.