Synthetic transmission fluid?
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is there any advantage over running synthetic trans fluid over regular? Other then just better against wear and tear? Like performance?
#2
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i would like to knwo the same.. i dont think it would.. people been running non synthetics for years with convertors and all.. but anywyas.. ya.. let me know too.. anyone?!
#3
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cali/Bay Area
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I understand it actually may be worse to run synthetic fluid. From what I heard, synthetic type fluid causes less friction on moving components including the clutches, which is not a good thing. I don't know anybody using it, so I really can't say for sure. The shops that I have asked said not to use it, so I will take their word for it. Hopefully someone else will chime in..
Dan
Dan
#5
Wheels up Director
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mantua, NJ
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
From What I heard Dan is correct. The synthetic stuff is too slippery for our clutch packs and the lock up clutch. A few people have run the synthetic with no problems but for the most part everybody uses the cheap stuff <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">
LAter <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
LAter <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
#6
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: newburgh, in
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
NOT TRUE! too many rumors get started about different types of oils, dino vs. synthetics. synthetic is better period. my fathers is a technician for allison automatic transmissions and they now require commercial users to run synthetic in their trannys or their waranty will be voided. think about, allison automatics are some severe duty trannys. regardless, there will always be poeple that are against synthetic, and those are the poeple that start these rumors for what ever reason.
#7
TECH Addict
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Live Oak, FL - in the woods where the creatures lurk.
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have run both (pre-converter) and could tell no functional difference. I'm running non-syn ATF with the converter as that was recommended. I would be interested in more opinions.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I dont think there is supposed to be a "functional" difference. What it is supposed to do is be better at disipating heat, as it does not break down like conventional. If you tried both, did you have a trans temp guage, or ATAP to monitor the differences in heat? Heat will kill the tranny. I recently spoke to a technician who has a tranny business & also teaches transmisions at a college, & he asked me if I ran synthetic, I told him no. He was surprised, & said that it will lower the temp by 20 degrees under load. So, I'll be giving that a try this year.