A 2000 SS in Jersey

iTrader: (4)

I apologize to you AUTOMATIC guys up front

"Camaros running the V-6 and automatic come across as being an accessible sports car for people who think a clutch is a small purse"

See the full article:

http://www.nextautos.com/driven-2010...src=Nextscreen


Ohh and Ponies are for little girls

Have fun!!!!!!

EnfuegoZ28

Ouch! I would take one if it was free, but I wouldn't go searching for the V6/AT combo.

A 2000 SS in Jersey

iTrader: (4)

And give it to the wife/gf/lil sister......

JPCrazyLegs

iTrader: (1)

Hey now! Its a good daily driver!

A 2000 SS in Jersey

iTrader: (4)

305 horse is nothing to sneeze at.......considering the original F body Ls1 was that

Torque I dont recall, but probable less.

JPCrazyLegs

iTrader: (1)

You gotta remember that sales are the only thing thats going to save GM. The v6 might be the little brother to the V8, but it appeals to a much wider market share starting at only 22,000 dollars, keeping our v8's in production.

A 2000 SS in Jersey

iTrader: (4)

Yes Indeed!!!!!!

RaggedRides

iTrader: (8)

To the wheels, not at the crank.

JD_AMG

LS1 Fbodies generally dyno 300hp to the wheels, thats 345ish hp to the flywheel. And the LS1 has about 100ft.lbs more torque than the 2010 V6 Camaro...

1999Transamman

iTrader: (18)

GM has built a badass V6 car, looks like it wont be enough to save them though. The American auto industry is in a nose dive to failure.

A 2000 SS in Jersey

iTrader: (4)

The original LS-1 was factory rated in the F-Body Z28 at 305, SS at 320.

Thats what I was talking about.

Yes, underrated, but that was the factory number.

Greg Pippin

iTrader: (3)

Dont the new V6 camaro have 5 more HP than the mustang GT?!?

JimmySprinkle

iTrader: (2)

^ GT is rated at 315, so actually 10 less.

SS02

Cant wait, wife gets the V6/RS..thats our first purchase. SS comes alittle later !!!

Sharpe

iTrader: (7)

And is a **** load lighter at the same time.

Greg Pippin

iTrader: (3)

The 4th gen or the 5th gen?

Sharpe

iTrader: (7)

A comparable fourth gen will be at least a few hundred pounds lighter, maybe as much as 500.

Greg Pippin

iTrader: (3)

I havent heard much about stats on the new camaro, what is the 1/4 mile, 0-60, ect...?
I know they are going to be around 420+/- hp. and the LS1 f-body has around 300hp and they ran 13.2-13.6. and i also know that every 100lbs adds .1 of a sec. in the 1/4.

Sharpe

iTrader: (7)

Camaro V6 REVIEWS

Autoweek -- (Discussion)
Cars.com -- (Discussion)
TheCarConnection.com
Automotive Traveler -- (Discussion)
Wheels.ca
Canadian Driver
Autoblog.com -- (Discussion)
Hot Rod -- (Discussion)
National Post
Winding Road -- (Discussion)
MSNBC -- (Discussion)



Camaro V8 REVIEWS

Motor Trend -- (Discussion)
Edmunds Inside Line -- (Discussion)
Autoline (Autoblog) -- (Discussion)
Jalopnik -- (Discussion)
Automobile -- (Discussion)
National Post -- (Discussion)
Car and Driver -- (Discussion)
Autoweek -- (Discussion)
Road & Track -- (Discussion)
Cars.com -- (Discussion)
TheCarConnection.com
Leftlanenews -- (Discussion)
Automotive Traveler -- (Discussion)
Wheels.ca
Popular Mechanics -- (Discussion)
Canadian Driver
Automotive Rhythms
Autoblog.com -- (Discussion)
Hot Rod -- (Discussion)
In-house Review by Number 3
National Post
Winding Road -- (Discussion)
MSNBC -- (Discussion)
GlobeAuto -- (Discussion)



COMPARISONS TO COMPETITORS

Motor Trend (vs. Mustang & Challenger) -- (Discussion)
Edmunds (vs. Mustang & Challenger) -- (Discussion)
Popular Mechanics (vs. Mustang & Challenger) -- (Discussion)
Edmunds (V6 Camaro vs. Hyundai Genesis) -- (Discussion)
Edmunds (V6 Camaro vs. Challenger SE)

A 2000 SS in Jersey

iTrader: (4)

500 lbs????????

My SS is 3800 lbs with my decidedly heavy 220 in it....LOL

What the heck the new Camaro weighs almost 2 tons dry??

Why???? sound deadining and safety stuff????