General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Who here thinks that the Gen 3 and 4 sections should be merged?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2008, 05:04 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Hans Grüber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb Who here thinks that the Gen 3 and 4 sections should be merged?

Who here believes that separate Gen 3 and 4 sections are really needed?

The differences between the two are simply too trivial for GM to have even been warranted in calling the updated design the Gen 4. I believe that the only reason that GM did this was for marketing reasons to make the C6 seem more radical when it was introduced.

Nearly every time that I use the search function, I come up with duplicate hits of the same topic being posted in each respective Gen 3 and 4 section. What is most annoying is that quite often one of the duplicate topics will have more and or different insightful posts that are not found in the other. So you have to read both topics anyways.

It simply seems that it would be practical to merge these two sections.
Old 07-14-2008, 05:10 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Vicinity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Electric throttle. Big difference.



I really don't know.
Old 07-14-2008, 05:37 AM
  #3  
myk
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
myk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 1,884
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Aren't they like, different cars?
Old 07-14-2008, 08:09 AM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Craiggg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think they should stay seperated. Within the 4th gen you already have ls1 and lt1 which are different groups. So why add another car?

=\
Old 07-14-2008, 08:33 AM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
b0pric01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

bad idea.
Old 07-14-2008, 09:16 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (104)
 
PontiacFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 3,669
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Not good.
Old 07-14-2008, 09:42 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
fuseone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: reading,pa
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i dont understand the logic behind this
Old 07-14-2008, 10:23 AM
  #8  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
sschkade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that he's talking about the Gen III/IV motors.

Either way, I wouldn't change anything about how they are split up.
Old 07-14-2008, 10:59 AM
  #9  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Hans Grüber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Craiggg
I think they should stay seperated. Within the 4th gen you already have ls1 and lt1 which are different groups. So why add another car?

=\
LT1 is the Gen 2
Old 07-14-2008, 12:20 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
 
SladeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

There's enough differences in parts to warrant it. It's tough enough to know what goes and doesn't on a Gen III let alone sift through the whole Gen IV along with it. Even when dealing with clutches we have to be aware of Gen III LS1/LS6 applications and Gen IV LS2/LS7 applications for the flywheels and that causes enough problems in the Manual forum, imagine all the little differences that would pop up from plug locations, what heads and intakes can or can't be used but swapped over and then the whole bore sizes... new engine modders would be pretty much lost trying to figure out if the info applies to them or not.
Old 07-14-2008, 12:29 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
V8Rumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocky Mtn thin air & snow...
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SladeX
There's enough differences in parts to warrant it. It's tough enough to know what goes and doesn't on a Gen III let alone sift through the whole Gen IV along with it. Even when dealing with clutches we have to be aware of Gen III LS1/LS6 applications and Gen IV LS2/LS7 applications for the flywheels and that causes enough problems in the Manual forum, imagine all the little differences that would pop up from plug locations, what heads and intakes can or can't be used but swapped over and then the whole bore sizes... new engine modders would be pretty much lost trying to figure out if the info applies to them or not.
Agreed. I'd HATE to see both sections combined...
Old 07-14-2008, 12:41 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The forum was split into gen3 and gen4 like a year or two ago for a reason.
Old 07-14-2008, 12:48 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Black FormulaLs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: cape vincent NY
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

leave it alone......
Old 07-14-2008, 01:08 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Kingc8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,557
Received 50 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

I also say leave it for the time being




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.