Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TPIS 90mm LS6 Intake Pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2015, 10:05 PM
  #81  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Mongoose350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

FAST intakes still sell pretty high most of the time. I just got luck and snagged a fast 90 for $400 from a buddy. The LS6 has pretty decent runner volume for a 346ci engine, but the biggest issue is that 78mm inlet. I've seen several people make claims that the tpis 90mm ls6 intakes rival the fast 90 (non ported).
Old 12-30-2015, 09:01 AM
  #82  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mongoose350
FAST intakes still sell pretty high most of the time. I just got luck and snagged a fast 90 for $400 from a buddy. The LS6 has pretty decent runner volume for a 346ci engine, but the biggest issue is that 78mm inlet. I've seen several people make claims that the tpis 90mm ls6 intakes rival the fast 90 (non ported).
The Fast 78 will outperform a LS6 intake. The inlet isn't the primary factor.

A couple weeks ago I was helping a buddy look for Fast intakes and found several in the $500-600 range in the classifieds here. Right now there is one that was cracked and repaired for $400 and another for an intake with 90mm tb for $900. I would take either of those over sending an intake off for the snout conversion.

Does TPIS even still do the conversion? I can't say I've seen any results from one of their intakes in several years and the ones I found back when I was deciding between buying a used Fast or trying the TPIS weren't all that impressive. People claimed it was as good as a Fast but I never found proof that was true. There was one magazine article floating around and that was about it.
Old 12-30-2015, 05:28 PM
  #83  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Mongoose350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
The Fast 78 will outperform a LS6 intake. The inlet isn't the primary factor.

A couple weeks ago I was helping a buddy look for Fast intakes and found several in the $500-600 range in the classifieds here. Right now there is one that was cracked and repaired for $400 and another for an intake with 90mm tb for $900. I would take either of those over sending an intake off for the snout conversion.

Does TPIS even still do the conversion? I can't say I've seen any results from one of their intakes in several years and the ones I found back when I was deciding between buying a used Fast or trying the TPIS weren't all that impressive. People claimed it was as good as a Fast but I never found proof that was true. There was one magazine article floating around and that was about it.
They do. I was considering it before I got a fast 90.
Old 01-05-2016, 09:41 AM
  #84  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,707
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Power isn't made in the TB size. It's made in the runners, and the FAST (78/90/92/102) is far superior to the LS6
Old 12-09-2016, 11:06 PM
  #85  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

I know this thread is old as F, but I have a 90' Camaro drag car with a STOCK LS1 long block. I have ran it with a LS1 and a LS6 intake and gained .25 sec. ET. I will probably be installing the 102 I have for some real world racing numbers. If someone has a TPIS intake they want to prove is as good, I would be happy to try it out for them. While I bet it will out perform a stock LS6 intake, I am sceptical about it besting the FAST.
Old 12-10-2016, 04:17 PM
  #86  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,614
Received 801 Likes on 611 Posts

Default

One of my facebook friends worked at a shop that did a bunch of Vettes, he said that the BBK was down about 3 hp compared to the Fast when they tested them.
Old 12-21-2016, 12:56 PM
  #87  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
FlorianGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 78
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'm looking into the LS6 TPIS 90mm intake, which throttle body would you recommend for my 02 CETA?
Old 12-21-2016, 06:43 PM
  #88  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Nick Williams followed by Fast. The Nick Williams is reported to be easier to tune idle because of a better IAC passage.
Old 12-22-2016, 02:24 AM
  #89  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
FlorianGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 78
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thanks, I'll look for a NW 90mm then. They seem to be hard to find, maybe the 90mm was discontinued?
Old 12-24-2016, 09:09 AM
  #90  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Get the 92
Old 12-24-2016, 03:29 PM
  #91  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
FlorianGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 78
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Will it fit as good as the 90mm?
Old 12-28-2016, 10:33 PM
  #92  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Yes it will
Old 06-20-2017, 06:01 AM
  #93  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
BlackNiteWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: s. jersey
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by teke184
not what i was expecting



as for cost comparison (cost new from TSP):

92mm FAST Intake Manifold with PTM 92mm Throttle Body = $1100
subtract $300-350 for the ls6 intake
subtract $50-100 for the stock throttle body (depending on if its ported)

total for a FAST setup is $650-750 out of pocket

cost for TPIS modified manifold is $350
plus the cost of the 90mm TB $350-400
minus the $50-100 for the stock TB

total for the modified setup is $600-700 out of pocket.


i'll chose the FAST...especially since it has the option to port
I know this thread is old. But i laugh at people that justify the cost of a FAST by selling their stock LS6 intake and TB. First of all, the FAST 92mm is over $900, now porting it is another $300 minimum. And the TB for $450. Thats a total of $1650!!!! No one is going to pay over $350 for the intake and maybe $100 to $150 for a stock TB. So thats $500 and that's on the high side. So subtract $500 from $1600.....you're still in the hole for $1000. So i guess gaining maybe 15rwhp justifies a $1600 intake setup? Wow must be nice. But it's funny i still don't see guys posting their times at the track to see how lower their E.T.'s got from that $900 intake.
Old 06-20-2017, 09:46 AM
  #94  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,602
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

I gained 4 tenths and 4 mph going with a ported FAST 102 etc over LS6 stuff after tuning. If you are going to spin it past 6500 then the MSD is the way to go. LS6 is too small on a decent 346. The TPIS LS6 should not even be considered these days in my opinion. The cost of intakes are high and a good throttle body price is insane. But that feeling goes out the door when you run 11.7s with bolt ons in a stock looking car and 10s with heads cam all on 93 octane. The cost of this hobby at times sucks for sure...
Old 06-20-2017, 12:33 PM
  #95  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
BlackNiteWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: s. jersey
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Morris
I gained 4 tenths and 4 mph going with a ported FAST 102 etc over LS6 stuff after tuning. If you are going to spin it past 6500 then the MSD is the way to go. LS6 is too small on a decent 346. The TPIS LS6 should not even be considered these days in my opinion. The cost of intakes are high and a good throttle body price is insane. But that feeling goes out the door when you run 11.7s with bolt ons in a stock looking car and 10s with heads cam all on 93 octane. The cost of this hobby at times sucks for sure...
HaHa i know what you mean. My full weight WS6 ran a best at Atco at a 11.78@117mph. Still used my stock front rims/tires. No front sway bar removed.
Full interior, stock 10 bolt with stock 3.23's. I had a Vig.3600 though, plus a home ported set of my stock 241's, and i ran the Comp. 216/220 114lsa. For that setup i had, there's NO WAY a FAST wouldn't be worth the cost for such a small gain. With my little 216/220 cam i wasn't even putting a strain on my LS6 intake. So spending $900 for an intake and $300 to $400 to have it ported. That's $1,200+ and that's not counting the TB. Now on a lighter car with big heads/big cam and gears then yes i can see the FAST giving gains, but unless i'm bracket racing, i would still have to ask myself if the FAST would be worth it. Over $1,500 for a few tenths isn't worth it to me. Plus the FAST wouldn't do you any favors on a everyday street car like my WS6 was. Unless i wanted to dyno race it. I saw more guys on here say they got 20hp on the dyno, yet the car was a turd at the track. I know what you mean about the MSD intake. I like that the runners are straight, cause as you know air doesn't like to make turns. The early FAST intakes the top of the runners made a 180 degree turn, that was where the opening was. And the FAST runners are the same as the LS6...they are both 11 inches. And the LS6 has a OK plenum volume. But it's BS when people say the TPIS LS6 intake doesn't work. That's BS. People use the excuse that the TB means nothing...haha Well if that was the case then why did FAST start with a 78mm TB, then go to a 90mm TB, then a 92mm TB, then finnally a 102mm opening? If TB opening doesn't mean nothing then why would FAST keep upping their intakes. So thats 100% proof that the 90mm opening on an LS6 intake works. The LS6 has 11 inch runners that flow very good, the plenum is a good design, so it's only the TB opening that was holding it back. And if TB openings didn't mean **** then why was everyone porting their TB's or running 78mm TB's? LOL.
Old 06-21-2017, 02:27 PM
  #96  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Trying to explain that the 90mm option has great gains is like trying to rope the wind. Everyone is always right about every combonation and no one else knows ****. There are plenty of threads proving the 90mm TPIS intake flat out performs. It may not outperform any Fast in certain applications but will in some. I have an LS6 intake with the snout busted off. Guess how I'm gonna have it repaired? LOL
Old 06-21-2017, 03:10 PM
  #97  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlackNiteWS6
HaHa i know what you mean. My full weight WS6 ran a best at Atco at a 11.78@117mph. Still used my stock front rims/tires. No front sway bar removed.
Full interior, stock 10 bolt with stock 3.23's. I had a Vig.3600 though, plus a home ported set of my stock 241's, and i ran the Comp. 216/220 114lsa. For that setup i had, there's NO WAY a FAST wouldn't be worth the cost for such a small gain. With my little 216/220 cam i wasn't even putting a strain on my LS6 intake. So spending $900 for an intake and $300 to $400 to have it ported. That's $1,200+ and that's not counting the TB. Now on a lighter car with big heads/big cam and gears then yes i can see the FAST giving gains, but unless i'm bracket racing, i would still have to ask myself if the FAST would be worth it. Over $1,500 for a few tenths isn't worth it to me. Plus the FAST wouldn't do you any favors on a everyday street car like my WS6 was. Unless i wanted to dyno race it. I saw more guys on here say they got 20hp on the dyno, yet the car was a turd at the track. I know what you mean about the MSD intake. I like that the runners are straight, cause as you know air doesn't like to make turns. The early FAST intakes the top of the runners made a 180 degree turn, that was where the opening was. And the FAST runners are the same as the LS6...they are both 11 inches. And the LS6 has a OK plenum volume. But it's BS when people say the TPIS LS6 intake doesn't work. That's BS. People use the excuse that the TB means nothing...haha Well if that was the case then why did FAST start with a 78mm TB, then go to a 90mm TB, then a 92mm TB, then finnally a 102mm opening? If TB opening doesn't mean nothing then why would FAST keep upping their intakes. So thats 100% proof that the 90mm opening on an LS6 intake works. The LS6 has 11 inch runners that flow very good, the plenum is a good design, so it's only the TB opening that was holding it back. And if TB openings didn't mean **** then why was everyone porting their TB's or running 78mm TB's? LOL.
It may not be the mosyt scientific explaination, but kind of hard to argue with that statement.

Man you STAY droppin knowledge!
Old 06-21-2017, 03:16 PM
  #98  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlackNiteWS6
I know this thread is old. But i laugh at people that justify the cost of a FAST by selling their stock LS6 intake and TB. First of all, the FAST 92mm is over $900, now porting it is another $300 minimum. And the TB for $450. Thats a total of $1650!!!! No one is going to pay over $350 for the intake and maybe $100 to $150 for a stock TB. So thats $500 and that's on the high side. So subtract $500 from $1600.....you're still in the hole for $1000. So i guess gaining maybe 15rwhp justifies a $1600 intake setup? Wow must be nice. But it's funny i still don't see guys posting their times at the track to see how lower their E.T.'s got from that $900 intake.
Pretty sure the person your responding to passed in a car accident some years back. I paid under $800 for my Fast 92 brand new and $100 to have it ported. Test after test has shown around a 20 rwhp gain over a LS6 when ported properly. That's pretty substantial. Its also not all about the initial gain but the benefit of the intake for future mods. Plus the resell isn't to shabby either.



Quick Reply: TPIS 90mm LS6 Intake Pics



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.