Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2011, 10:32 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
04goat350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default 5.3 heads

For a 04 GTO m6 looking to make around 450 at the wheel give or take which 5.3 heads would be better the 63cc heads or the 67cc for the combustion chamber?
Old 08-09-2011, 12:18 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (12)
 
jdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ballston Spa, NY
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You'll make more N/A power with the 63cc chambers due to higher compression. Depending on your budget, I would go with a 243 (ls6) casting. If you really want truck heads, I have a set of stockers that I put LS6 springs on that you can have for $150. I'll deliver them to you...
Old 08-09-2011, 12:45 AM
  #3  
Launching!
 
Canbarelygo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shawnee, OK
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

in reality the 5.3s i would think would be the much cheaper better option. if your talkin after market they flow very very close in aftermarket form to the ls6 head in aftermarket form with a smaller combustion chamber. i think there n/a it would be a no brainer to go with the 5.3s. if we are talkin budget id still say go 5.3s i got my 5.3 heads valve jobbed and surfaced and had my ls1 valves stuck in em and when it was all said and done i had just 300 bucks in them including buying them
Old 08-09-2011, 02:56 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (12)
 
jdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ballston Spa, NY
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Canbarelygo
in reality the 5.3s i would think would be the much cheaper better option. if your talkin after market they flow very very close in aftermarket form to the ls6 head in aftermarket form with a smaller combustion chamber. i think there n/a it would be a no brainer to go with the 5.3s. if we are talkin budget id still say go 5.3s i got my 5.3 heads valve jobbed and surfaced and had my ls1 valves stuck in em and when it was all said and done i had just 300 bucks in them including buying them
In aftermarket form, a ***** out to the limits ported 5.3 head flows about the same as a barely ported LS6 head. A max effort port on an LS6 head is superior in every way. Chamber size is irrelevant at that point as you can choose your combustion chamber size for either when you order them.
Old 08-09-2011, 03:47 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

A 243/799 head is a better head IMO. It can be milled for compression if that's desired but not always needed. A well put together combo does not need to run on the ragged edge to produce results, meaning PTV clearance, compression, shift rpms etc.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 PM.