LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion (https://ls1tech.com/forums/)
-   Generation III External Engine (https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine-6/)
-   -   1 7/8 LT's on a SI LS1? (https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine/1473201-1-7-8-lts-si-ls1.html)

kinglt-1 Oct 4, 2011 12:40 AM

1 7/8 LT's on a SI LS1?
 
I have been reading up on which LT header 1 3/4 or 1 7/8 makes more power on a stock internal ls1. It seems the most recent posts show that the 1 7/8 still show gains. My concern is I just ordered a set of kooks 1 7/8 LT's w/ the kooks 3" true dual setup. It will take 2-4 weeks to complete, so I can still change if need be. My logic on purchasing the 1 7/8 was to leave room for growth. Right now Im just normal bolt-ons other than 1.85 rockers/918 springs. I will be installing a fti 3800 converter when the exhaust gets installed. Next mod in the future will be a n2o outlet wet plate or the whipple 2.9 f-body kit, when and if it's released...other than that Im pretty much plan on staying stock internal...I might do a small cam but most likely not. So am I on the right track or should I change the order to the 1 3/4 LT's? Thanks

MeentSS02 Oct 4, 2011 07:49 AM

It won't hurt anything going with the 1-7/8" primaries at this point - I've been running them on my bolt-ons only '02 Camaro for the better part of the past two years. Prior to that, I was running Kooks 1-3/4" headers. The 1-7/8" primaries are a bit tighter, but everything still cleared just fine, and the install went smoothly. As an added bonus, the collectors ended in the same spot, so I bolted my existing exhaust right up and was on my way.

Performance-wise, I didn't really notice anything one way or another, but wasn't really expecting to (I didn't do a back-to-back dyno though). It'll definitely leave me room to grow down the road, and that's what I was really after.

BrntWS6 Oct 4, 2011 08:14 AM

I wish I would have went with 1 7/8 when I bought mine years ago. From talking with my tuner the 1 3/4 don't really become a restriction until around 440 rwhp, but i've never heard anything negative about 1 7/8 on a bolt-on car. I just did H/C so I'll be switching soon.

kinglt-1 Oct 4, 2011 09:45 AM

Thanks for the replies! I have hooker 1 3/4 now and they are about rusted out and the car never sees rain or snow lol. I figured might aswell get the stainless 1 7/8 and never buy headers again. My only concern, which is why I post this thread,, because a well repected member(Mr. Tony Mamo) posted in a older thread that they would hurt tq significantly in the lower rpms. But then texas speed did a dyno comparison between thier 1 7/8 vs pacesetter 1 3/4 and they picked up power everywhere. I leaning towards it being a myth, just like the fast 102 hurting power on a 346 myth that was busted.

Guitar Oct 4, 2011 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by kinglt-1 (Post 15466971)
Thanks for the replies! I have hooker 1 3/4 now and they are about rusted out and the car never sees rain or snow lol. I figured might aswell get the stainless 1 7/8 and never buy headers again. My only concern, which is why I post this thread,, because a well repected member(Mr. Tony Mamo) posted in a older thread that they would hurt tq significantly in the lower rpms. But then texas speed did a dyno comparison between thier 1 7/8 vs pacesetter 1 3/4 and they picked up power everywhere. I leaning towards it being a myth, just like the fast 102 hurting power on a 346 myth that was busted.

Maybe that is without a tune?

MeentSS02 Oct 4, 2011 11:00 AM

Part throttle isn't as crisp to me as it was with the 1-3/4" headers, but that isn't something that would show up on a dyno since a dyno only shows WOT. I don't miss it much since my 4.11s out back make traction an issue by itself, and I also have a fairly lightweight clutch assembly that makes things a bit peppier too around town.

I didn't buy them for the engine currently in my car (like I said - bolt-ons only), but for the engine I'm planning to build on down the line. Any gains/losses switching between the two wasn't enough for me to be concerned, and I wouldn't hesitate to do it again.

kinglt-1 Oct 4, 2011 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by Guitar (Post 15467170)
Maybe that is without a tune?

No im pretty sure it was tuned, but he is the only one that I have seen to post such results.... I would post a link but now I cant find the thread lol. it was back in 2006

kinglt-1 Oct 4, 2011 11:05 AM


Originally Posted by MeentSS02 (Post 15467282)
Part throttle isn't as crisp to me as it was with the 1-3/4" headers, but that isn't something that would show up on a dyno since that is WOT only. I don't miss it much since my 4.11s out back make traction an issue by itself, and I also have a fairly lightweight clutch assembly that makes things a bit peppier too around town.

I didn't buy them for the engine currently in my car (like I said - bolt-ons only), but for the engine I'm planning to build on down the line. Any gains/losses switching between the two wasn't enough for me to be concerned, and I wouldn't hesitate to do it again.

na im not to worried about it either... I dont daily drive the car, so a little less throttle response won't bother me. Besides when the stall goes in, any gains/losses under 3k will be pointless.

WKMCD Oct 4, 2011 11:44 AM

In testing (DJ), the 1 7/8 consistently showed gains everywhere over the 1 3/4. Anything else is more internet misinformation.

Stippy17 Oct 4, 2011 12:56 PM

Does anybody have links to the comparisons?

I am also running Pacesetter 1 3/4" headers that were on the car when I bought it. They are rusting away and Id like to swap to a set of stainless steel. I figure I would bump up to 1 7/8" if it would be worth it tho. I'm currently around 410whp on a stock bottom end LS1. I don't want to lose low end just to gain a tad bit of mid and top end, so visual comparisons would help me decide.

kinglt-1 Oct 4, 2011 06:57 PM


Originally Posted by Stippy17 (Post 15467696)
Does anybody have links to the comparisons?

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...s-1-7-8-a.html

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...o-results.html

TImmy_Jones Oct 4, 2011 08:38 PM

Good decision. Hope you got the package for a good deal, that is a TON of money to spend. With any FI or nitrous, the 1 7/8" will certainly be worth it.

gregrob Oct 5, 2011 03:33 AM

I love the 1 7/8 on mine. It defintely does NOT lack for tq down low... It snaps your neck when you nail the throttle. Of course the stall helps that, but the engine is making mad tq.

kinglt-1 Oct 5, 2011 09:51 AM

^good to know! Thanks

Stippy17 Oct 5, 2011 11:02 AM

Thanks for the links I read both threads and they were helpful. Id still like to see dyno comparisons for small bore 346's to better help me decide. Ill most likely go with the 1 7/8" after a little more research.

kinglt-1 Oct 5, 2011 08:38 PM


Originally Posted by Stippy17 (Post 15471686)
Thanks for the links I read both threads and they were helpful. Id still like to see dyno comparisons for small bore 346's to better help me decide. Ill most likely go with the 1 7/8" after a little more research.

no prob...if you find some more good links post them up!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands