Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ported FAST 90 vs non port Fast 102 questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2016, 03:41 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
WADDISME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Ported FAST 90 vs non port Fast 102 questions

Couldn't find anything with search. My Vengeance Racing ported 90mm developed a leak and I repl with new FAST 102 as I didn't want to wait on getting old one repaired. When repaired, will the ported 90mm be better for my stroked LS2 than non ported 102? Mods are in signature. Here is my dyno sheet with ported FAST:




Pic of the ported Fast:








Thoughts?
Old 12-19-2016, 03:46 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I would suspect it will be pretty close. The only difference between the FAST 90mm and FAST 92mm is the inlet size, which Vengeance probably took care of when they ported it. I assume they ported the inlet out to 92mm, but could be wrong. You may see 5 rwhp more out of the FAST 102mm, but I wouldn't expect much more.
Old 12-19-2016, 03:52 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
WADDISME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Would have been a nice comparison if they would have dynoed it after installing the 102.
Old 12-19-2016, 04:15 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I'd agree w/ phoenix but it would have been cool to have another pull on the dyno. What is the graph you posted showing? The stock LS2 vs. the ported 90?
Old 12-20-2016, 08:19 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
WADDISME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Graph shows my old 402 with ported 90mm FAST with MS3 cam. Latest run show my new 402 with custom cam and ported 90mm FAST. Don't have one with just stock 102 yet. Will try to get one next time they have it.
Old 12-20-2016, 08:53 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
WADDISME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Graph shows my old 402 with ported 90mm FAST with MS3 cam. Latest run show my new 402 with custom cam and ported 90mm FAST. Don't have one with just stock 102 yet. Will try to get one next time they have it.
Old 12-21-2016, 04:09 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,431 Likes on 991 Posts

Default

Speculation and SWAG (Super Wild *** Guess)

From what I've read a good 90MM TB will flow 1300CFM+, naturally aspirated, and 102MM TB 1500CFM+

I think the two intakes will be within a few peak hp of each other. The 90 mm will probably be easier to dial in tuning and may drive better. Since the 90 was ported it might match up to the cylinder heads a little better than the unported 102. The ported 90 may make an extra hp or two.
Old 12-21-2016, 11:09 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Neither are good for a stroker

The fast 102'has the edge over the 92 in plenum and the size
Old 12-22-2016, 06:35 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
slogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 985
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Sounds like you didn't want to wait for the 90 to be repaired, so you put a new 102
on, did I understand that correct? If so are you driving it with the 102, and if so, can
you tell a difference?



Quick Reply: Ported FAST 90 vs non port Fast 102 questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.