Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TSP Duals vs Y Pipe/Catback for H/C/I 150 shot

Old 01-03-2019, 07:16 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (77)
 
98RedBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 2,772
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default TSP Duals vs Y Pipe/Catback for H/C/I 150 shot

So a few years ago I picked up a set of TSP 1 7/8's and their rumbler duals. They were intended for another car that they never went on.

So now I'm building this car and still have them sitting there.

That said, the duals will present a few issues for me. I'm going to be lowered on strano's/koni yellow's, so ground clearance with the duals will suffer compared to a y setup.

The other issue is drone, the duals can suck in an automatic (which this car is).

The other "possible" issue is smell. I do have the option to run cats with the y pipe setup to cut down on the odor if I so choose.

If not for the potential power loss, I'd absolutely go with the y pipe setup.

So, in regards to the power being given up between the two, what are we realistically talking here? Both H/C/I and with the 150 shot?

Old 01-04-2019, 01:11 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
trilkb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Received 77 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

Maybe a 4" catback would be the best route. Maybe tsp with cutouts at the headers?

one guy just saw big gains from true duals out the back.

Everything is a sacrifice.
Old 01-04-2019, 01:27 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
LSleeper1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 167
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Check out Mavn's build thread on the gen 3 page. Picked up YUUUGEEE gains with the speed engineering duals over the stocker y pipe stuff
Old 01-07-2019, 11:39 AM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Cant compare dual to stockish y pipe setup. A good merge with a 4" outlet is gonna sound the same and perform better in my opinion. My heads/cam car is trapping 99MPH in the 1/8th and sounds damn good.

I didn't know it was gonna be a pro tree so I left at too low of an rpm. Otherwise I would have left around 6,000

Old 01-08-2019, 02:27 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
383z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston/Clear Lake, TX.
Posts: 619
Received 57 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

I've learned that if you want to run a Y pipe and get the most out of it you will need a y pipe merge of 3inches into 4 inches and then a cutout.
A Flowmater merge is the best bang for the buck that I've read.
Here are some pics of what I mean.


Old 01-08-2019, 02:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
bad_408_vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Queens, NYC
Posts: 3,409
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

There’s limited options with space in lowered car.
Another possibility is to run cutouts before the y merge.
Depends on if you will get alotta street driving on bad roads.
This is what im going with in spring.


Last edited by bad_408_vert; 01-08-2019 at 02:56 PM.
Old 01-09-2019, 12:28 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
383z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston/Clear Lake, TX.
Posts: 619
Received 57 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bad_408_vert
There’s limited options with space in lowered car.
Another possibility is to run cutouts before the y merge.
Depends on if you will get alotta street driving on bad roads.
This is what im going with in spring.

Damn that looks pretty!!
What are all the parts you used and how did you get it one color?
Old 01-09-2019, 08:37 AM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
bad_408_vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Queens, NYC
Posts: 3,409
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 383z
Damn that looks pretty!!
What are all the parts you used and how did you get it one color?
Thanks, that picture is something I want to do, not my ypipe.
Parts, From what I can see it’s 2 cutouts, Flowmaster Y merge, meticously bent pipes and some paint.
Old 01-10-2019, 01:17 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
383z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston/Clear Lake, TX.
Posts: 619
Received 57 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

I wonder what brand cut outs are those? I don't recognize them.
Old 01-10-2019, 06:39 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ZYA_LTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Clinton Twp. Michigan
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They look like any standard cutout available at Summit or Jegs, plain jane 3 bolt flange setup, just custom trimmed by installer to align properly with the Y-pipe.
Old 01-21-2019, 03:21 PM
  #11  
TECH Regular
 
tberg725's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 435
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

My vote will always be running an x pipe over y ive just seen too many times where a y pipe holds a combo back and imo these things sound wayyyy better with a dumped x i have it set up like that and dont seem to have a droning issue
Old 01-28-2019, 12:43 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 2,118
Received 196 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98RedBird
So a few years ago I picked up a set of TSP 1 7/8's and their rumbler duals. They were intended for another car that they never went on.

So now I'm building this car and still have them sitting there.

That said, the duals will present a few issues for me. I'm going to be lowered on strano's/koni yellow's, so ground clearance with the duals will suffer compared to a y setup.

The other issue is drone, the duals can suck in an automatic (which this car is).

The other "possible" issue is smell. I do have the option to run cats with the y pipe setup to cut down on the odor if I so choose.

If not for the potential power loss, I'd absolutely go with the y pipe setup.

So, in regards to the power being given up between the two, what are we realistically talking here? Both H/C/I and with the 150 shot?
This is what I did. I'm H/C/I on a 150 shot.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...e-cutouts.html
Old 01-31-2019, 09:57 AM
  #13  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Problem is a Y-pipe/cutout combo is much easier to live with vs. true duals. I had Kooks TDs for 6 years. It was miserable. Absolutely ******* miserable. Inside the car was 95db when the stall was slipping in traffic. 95! With second skin damplifier throughout for noise suppression. Cruising was 80-85. Idle was 77-78. Again, that's inside the car. Louder than my damn Harley. I had my brother stand outside with my SPL meter. I was over 130db WOT driving away.

With the TSP catback, it's more like 75 now inside. But it doesn't drone... the low frequency resonance isn't there. Cutout picks up about 15HP over the catback. Duals are worth a good 20HP at least. More torque in the midrange and more power after peak. I may eventually swap mufflers out on the duals (like Corsa 3" RSCs) and go back to them. But eh.
Old 02-06-2019, 12:38 AM
  #14  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
warriorpluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 416
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Full-Force
Cant compare dual to stockish y pipe setup. A good merge with a 4" outlet is gonna sound the same and perform better in my opinion. My heads/cam car is trapping 99MPH in the 1/8th and sounds damn good.

I didn't know it was gonna be a pro tree so I left at too low of an rpm. Otherwise I would have left around 6,000

VIDEO
Whoa man that thing moves out. What's your suspension setup?
Old 02-06-2019, 08:43 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
landstuhltaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CBUS
Posts: 1,279
Received 45 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

I would never bother with the extra weight of a dual setup. Good 3" Y into a 3.5 or 4" merge and then pick how you want to finish it. I've been running a catted ARH 3.5" Y for two years now with a single Coastfab muffler dumped before the axle. Lightest setup you will find and keeps the car at ~98dB at 50ft under WOT. If you don't like the noise in the cabin just run it all the way out the back.


Old 02-15-2019, 08:51 AM
  #16  
Teching In
 
blown69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bonaire, Ga.
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

These are a few pictures of my son’s 2001 SS exhaust with dual cut-outs. Used TSP y-pipe with QTP cut-outs and works great with no ground clearance issues. It sits level with the exhaust pipe. We positioned the cut-outs in the best place to maximize clearance on all sides. Works great and the QTP cut-outs can be opened slightly or wide open or anywhere in between. That’s great for cruising when you want a little more sound with out full open exhaust. Also good for a Procharged 755 horse preliminary dyno tune a couple of weeks ago so flows good as well!


Old 02-17-2019, 09:09 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,584
Received 1,431 Likes on 991 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
Problem is a Y-pipe/cutout combo is much easier to live with vs. true duals. I had Kooks TDs for 6 years. It was miserable. Absolutely ******* miserable. Inside the car was 95db when the stall was slipping in traffic. 95! With second skin damplifier throughout for noise suppression. Cruising was 80-85. Idle was 77-78. Again, that's inside the car. Louder than my damn Harley. I had my brother stand outside with my SPL meter. I was over 130db WOT driving away.

With the TSP catback, it's more like 75 now inside. But it doesn't drone... the low frequency resonance isn't there. Cutout picks up about 15HP over the catback. Duals are worth a good 20HP at least. More torque in the midrange and more power after peak. I may eventually swap mufflers out on the duals (like Corsa 3" RSCs) and go back to them. But eh.
That's definitely good information about the dB levels with Kook's True Dual Exhaust vs TSP Catback with Y pipe.

Downloaded Sound Meter dB app for my cellphone and checked the following. I'm sure that's not quite as accurate as a dB meter.

02 Z28 - stock
Idle in the car 45-50 dB
Idle outside the car, 20 inches from exhaust phone at exhaust level 45 degree angle - 55-58 dB
​​​​​​2,000 rpm cruise - 60-63 dB

99 Trans Am - 416, Kook's LT's headers, no cats, Hooker Blackheart 2.5 inch True Dual exhaust with x-pipe.
Idle in the car - 60-65 dB
Idle outside of the car, 20 inches away at exhaust level, 45 degree angle - 78-82 dB
2000 rpm to 2500 rpm- County road - 73-76 dB
2500 rpm - interstate - 70-73 dB

​​​​​​​The BlackHeart is close to my limit of being able to tolerate and daily drive or do a long trip. Can't imagine what the Kook's True Duals would be like.
Old 02-17-2019, 10:36 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
handyandy496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: florida
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bad_408_vert
There’s limited options with space in lowered car.
Another possibility is to run cutouts before the y merge.
Depends on if you will get alotta street driving on bad roads.
This is what im going with in spring.

This is what I have. I got it from Mufflex. I have the 1 cut out after the merge on 4" pipe. The flowmaster merge creates good flow. Gain was 5mph in the 1/8. 98.38mph. 6.9 et.
Old 02-17-2019, 10:41 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,862
Received 3,017 Likes on 2,348 Posts
Default

Those Flowmaster merges pay for themselves...
Old 02-18-2019, 05:32 AM
  #20  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (43)
 
rel3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD.
Posts: 2,836
Received 284 Likes on 187 Posts

Question

Originally Posted by handyandy496
This is what I have. I got it from Mufflex. I have the 1 cut out after the merge on 4" pipe. The flowmaster merge creates good flow. Gain was 5mph in the 1/8. 98.38mph. 6.9 et.
Gained 5mph over using WHAT?
What did that replace? 5mph gain is a LOT.
I'm curious what you had prior to Mufflex/Flowmaster merge.

I have a mild 6.0 with just a set of 1-3/4" BBK longtubes and their included Y.
Turbo spec'd cam that it had, showed zero gain between full closed exhaust (Jeg's) and 3" cutout open, mounted in the "I" pipe under passenger side rear seat.
Now with better cam, there's an obvious power difference between the two.
Just trying to figure if I should "start over" exhaust wise?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 AM.