Just got tuned
05-23-2006, 04:31 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TN
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just got tuned I put down 327/332. I thought it had more in it, but it runs like a bat outta hell anyway. It made power all the way across. A/F is about 12.5 WOT. I think we ended up with 23* timing. Does this seem decent for my mods?
05-23-2006, 04:50 PM
#2
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That seems ok, but kinnda on lower side.... 1998 ls1's dynoed lower than 2001+ ls1's.
My 2001 SS dynoed 325 rwhp/333 rwhp STOCK.
Also, what kind of dyno was it? Mustang or DynoJet ?
Mustang dynos lower, as it is a "full load" dyno (aka better for tuning)
My 2001 SS dynoed 325 rwhp/333 rwhp STOCK.
Also, what kind of dyno was it? Mustang or DynoJet ?
Mustang dynos lower, as it is a "full load" dyno (aka better for tuning)
05-23-2006, 05:08 PM
#3
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TN
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was a Dynojet and my car is also an auto. It was hot as hell too. I was hoping for higher numbers but, after all, it's only a number. I'm pretty sure my new 12-bolt eats up a few hp. It feels pretty quick. I'll take it to the track soon and see what it does.
05-23-2006, 05:09 PM
#4
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AdamSS
That seems ok, but kinnda on lower side.... 1998 ls1's dynoed lower than 2001+ ls1's.
My 2001 SS dynoed 325 rwhp/333 rwhp STOCK.
Also, what kind of dyno was it? Mustang or DynoJet ?
Mustang dynos lower, as it is a "full load" dyno (aka better for tuning)
My 2001 SS dynoed 325 rwhp/333 rwhp STOCK.
Also, what kind of dyno was it? Mustang or DynoJet ?
Mustang dynos lower, as it is a "full load" dyno (aka better for tuning)
LS6 intake, no egr and a slightly larger cam will do that.
Good numbers.
05-23-2006, 05:12 PM
#5
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St Paul, MN
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 8GTOKLR
LS6 intake, no egr and a slightly larger cam will do that.
Good numbers.
Good numbers.
05-23-2006, 07:36 PM
#7
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes 01-02 cars has smalller profile cam to offset the Ls6 intake, hence I think his numbers are low with LT headers, which usualy gain 20+ rwhp...
His numbers should have been in 340rwhp+ range....
His numbers should have been in 340rwhp+ range....
