LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion (https://ls1tech.com/forums/)
-   Generation III Internal Engine (https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine-5/)
-   -   AFR LS1 205cc (https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/125077-afr-ls1-205cc.html)

1BADAIR 12-30-2003 03:58 PM

AFR LS1 205cc
 
Just saw this in Feb Hot Rod mag.
Flow numbers for the AFR 205-not sure if they are as cast or cnc ported
AFR ---------------- LS1---------------Ls6 -----------GMPP LS6
.200---144/116-------136/108 -----------137/116-----------142/113
.300---208/170-------196/145------------188/153-----------209/156
.400---255/206-------217/170------------233/175-----------257/189
.500---287/221-------224/186------------260/193-----------283/220
.550---296/227-------227/192------------245/227-----------286/199
.600---302/232-------230/198------------245/200---------- 287/231
.650---304/236-------233/200------------245/202-----------289/233
4.125 bore fixture and 1.875 flow tube

Roger White 12-30-2003 04:00 PM

How does that compare to ls6 stage II's ?

gomer 12-30-2003 04:03 PM

Does anyone know the flow numbers on a standard LS1 bore size? Why the heck did they flow them on a 4.125 bore? That's not a good standard for comparison at all.

Linear Velocity 12-30-2003 04:06 PM

Hmm, how much more can they get out of those? My 5.7 LS1 heads flowed 337 cfm @ .600" on the intake, doesn't look like the AFR's will be worth the money :confused:

niphilli 12-30-2003 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by Linear Velocity
Hmm, how much more can they get out of those? My 5.7 LS1 heads flowed 337 cfm @ .600" on the intake, doesn't look like the AFR's will be worth the money :confused:


That is what I was thinking. Intake numbers look OK, mid lift numbers look good, but exhaust numbers leave some to be desired.

SScam68 12-30-2003 04:14 PM


Originally Posted by gomer
Does anyone know the flow numbers on a standard LS1 bore size? Why the heck did the flow them on a 4.125 bore?

Ditto!

383ss 12-30-2003 04:39 PM


Originally Posted by Linear Velocity
Hmm, how much more can they get out of those? My 5.7 LS1 heads flowed 337 cfm @ .600" on the intake, doesn't look like the AFR's will be worth the money :confused:

you've got to look at the port volume too. 205 is damn small.

sr71bb 12-30-2003 05:07 PM

Gomer I totally agree. Flowing on a 4.125 bore with the 205 heads is very deceiving because those 205 heads are suppose to be for stock cubed motors up to around 400CI motors. They should have flowed them on a 3.905 bore.

Linear whose heads are those that flowed 337??? I have NEVER seen a set flow that much on a 3.905 or 4.00 bore. Never mind!!! I see you have a big bore motor!!!!!

Linear Velocity 12-30-2003 05:19 PM


Originally Posted by sr71bb
Gomer I totally agree. Flowing on a 4.125 bore with the 205 heads is very deceiving because those 205 heads are suppose to be for stock cubed motors up to around 400CI motors. They should have flowed them on a 3.905 bore.

Linear whose heads are those that flowed 337??? I have NEVER seen a set flow that much on a 3.905 or 4.00 bore. Never mind!!! I see you have a big bore motor!!!!!

I got the heads through AAP, the actual porter's are Race Prep Engineering, thy know their stuff. My buddy Micah's 6.0 heads flowed 342 cfm on a stock 3.90" bore :eek2:

JakeL 12-30-2003 05:27 PM

I'm curious to see the stock LS1 and LS6 numbers, for comparison to the AFR's, and also if those were as-cast or CNC'd numbers.

I have to admit, I'm a bit nonplussed by those numbers as well. Might feel OK about not spending a million bucks on heads after all...

-Jake

jmX 12-30-2003 05:40 PM

Definitly need to compare against numbers on the same bench to figure out if they are impressive or not. The stock head numbers would maybe help give us a baseline as to how that flowbench/testing conditions compare.

Slowverado 12-30-2003 05:50 PM

every add i've seen for these heads they claim a 75HP increase over stock....that's insane

42NightZ28 12-30-2003 06:48 PM

the flow numbers your seeing on the 205 is the CNC ported ones. They need to post the 200 as cast heads flow numbers.

Y2K2LS1 12-30-2003 06:55 PM

You are all forgetting about the 200/205cc port volume on the AFR's. More velocity!

Arent all the popular porters around 220cc or so port volume?

MONGOOSEWS7 12-30-2003 07:07 PM

AFR also makes a 220cc head. so if the 205 head flows 302/232 at .600 lft imagine what the 220 would flow!

1BADAIR 12-30-2003 07:14 PM

i added the stock LS1 and Ls6 to the original post. The add also mentions that the AFR's cross section in the intake port is 30% smaller than the ported GMPP.(more velocity) And that the AFR's have a raised short turn radius for better flow to the back of the valve

gomer 12-30-2003 07:16 PM


Originally Posted by MONGOOSEWS7
AFR also makes a 220cc head. so if the 205 head flows 302/232 at .600 lft imagine what the 220 would flow!


BUT that 302/232 is on a 4.125 bore. That totally skews the numbers. The difference in flow between a 3.905 and 4.125 bore is substantial. Published numbers like that are good for one thing.. selling heads to people that don't know any better. Is there ANY numbers out on these heads being flowed on a 3.905 bore?

Shinobi'sZ 12-30-2003 07:36 PM

AFR has been great in the industry. My flow numbers off of my Stage II LS6 heads (2.02/1.57 valves) flow better than those 4.125" bore heads..if they have the big valves the intake should be more like 360 @ 600. Howerver AFR knows a lot more about heads than I do. I trust thier product..it will be nice to see what kind of dyno numbers they get out of those heads....remember our intakes only flow so much..so whats the use until we free up that restriction.

CAT3 12-30-2003 07:55 PM

Yeah, need to get a sponsor or something to set up a flowbench, with a set of each heads, same bench, bore, pipe etc.....and then see numbers. But right on about smaller port, and velocity.

Slowhawk 12-30-2003 08:23 PM

I think you guy's might be jumping on the wrong part here..Those AFR flow #'s with only 205cc ports is awesome,if true..My Ported LS6's flow alittle more but the port is 221cc.(stock is 215cc)..By the way it looks,346's with these heads will kick ass across the rev range over stage 2 ported heads due to the velocity....
I wish they will hurry up and release them so we can stop debating and find the facts!!!!!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands