Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is my H/C/I combo correct for my RWHP #'s? *Pic of DYNO Graph & Mod list included*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2010, 12:17 PM
  #21  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yeah it sounds right for a budget combo. My 5 year old 228/232, ls6 intake, patriot headed combo went 430 through an M6... got something better now though..

then again there's combos like chris1313 making almost 490 rwhp through a stock bottom end locked A4.. but he has a fast, out of the box cast TFS heads and a custom cam (same cost as any other cam) and a lot of attention to detail. It explains the 75 rwhp difference.

You can always spray it for more power.
Old 06-18-2010, 01:05 PM
  #22  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
sscamaroburn02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,052
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

#'s in sig. i've got an M6 with same heads very similiar cam and with a FAST 92out of the box. I am happy with my numbers considering mine was a budget build. You could probably use bigger injectors to that may help on the top end of it.

Take it to the track and see what it runs.
Old 06-18-2010, 08:06 PM
  #23  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Id say your right on par, I'd say a ls1 with prc 5.3 heads and a tqv3 would make 420 out of the box. You made 413 not that bad I'd say and 385 ft. lbs. is pretty good in an auto. Just think it could be worse you could have spent 2x as much money on a 3V and only make 375rwhp!!
Old 06-18-2010, 09:08 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,707
Received 298 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Have you taken her down the track and how does she perform. Until then I would take numbers with a grain of salt. If your running 13's at 110 then I would start to worry.
Old 06-19-2010, 12:57 AM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 7,336
Received 72 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Matt,

Don't worry about the numbers just yet cause honestly I think they are on point. I think its more of a problem with your mods being slapped together and not match correctly. Get that suspension fixed and some track times first. You will eventually need a FAST intake and I think upgrading to a SS3600 stall will greatly benefit you too.

Hurry up and get it together so I can spank that *** again
Old 06-19-2010, 03:02 AM
  #26  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
odarabla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Detoxx03
Matt,

Don't worry about the numbers just yet cause honestly I think they are on point. I think its more of a problem with your mods being slapped together and not match correctly. Get that suspension fixed and some track times first. You will eventually need a FAST intake and I think upgrading to a SS3600 stall will greatly benefit you too.

Hurry up and get it together so I can spank that *** again
Hey man, when you gonna be back in town again over in the big easy? You still running the stock heads on that beast? We need to line them up before I throw my new motor in my car!!
Old 06-19-2010, 02:11 PM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 7,336
Received 72 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

I'm around
Old 06-19-2010, 04:44 PM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
odarabla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Detoxx03
I'm around
Send me a pm bro. I should have my tranny in and ready to go by next tuesday.
Old 06-20-2010, 11:04 AM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
ShevrolayZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

For perspective. My car did 427 rwhp and 398 rwtq when it had a 6 speed, this was on a relatively stingy Dynojet. (Stock bottom, AFR 205, 224/228 cam and all the bolt ons)

I swapped in a 4L80 with a Yank SS4000 and dyno'd again, this time on a Mustang dyno. I don't recall the dyno #'s, but it was a lot less, as I couldn't lock the verter at WOT using the Compushift. We did a 1/4 mile simulation on the load dyno and it ran 11.2x.

Went to the track and ran 11.36 @ 120... not bad at all IMO

Moral to the story is, like Jon Janz said, don't worry about the dyno number, race it and see what it does.
Old 06-20-2010, 09:17 PM
  #30  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
VenomTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOLA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paint_It_Black
yeah it sounds right for a budget combo. My 5 year old 228/232, ls6 intake, patriot headed combo went 430 through an M6... got something better now though..

then again there's combos like chris1313 making almost 490 rwhp through a stock bottom end locked A4.. but he has a fast, out of the box cast TFS heads and a custom cam (same cost as any other cam) and a lot of attention to detail. It explains the 75 rwhp difference.

You can always spray it for more power.
Originally Posted by sscamaroburn02
#'s in sig. i've got an M6 with same heads very similiar cam and with a FAST 92out of the box. I am happy with my numbers considering mine was a budget build. You could probably use bigger injectors to that may help on the top end of it.

Take it to the track and see what it runs.
Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
Id say your right on par, I'd say a ls1 with prc 5.3 heads and a tqv3 would make 420 out of the box. You made 413 not that bad I'd say and 385 ft. lbs. is pretty good in an auto. Just think it could be worse you could have spent 2x as much money on a 3V and only make 375rwhp!!
Originally Posted by 02*C5
Have you taken her down the track and how does she perform. Until then I would take numbers with a grain of salt. If your running 13's at 110 then I would start to worry.

Originally Posted by ShevrolayZ28
For perspective. My car did 427 rwhp and 398 rwtq when it had a 6 speed, this was on a relatively stingy Dynojet. (Stock bottom, AFR 205, 224/228 cam and all the bolt ons)

I swapped in a 4L80 with a Yank SS4000 and dyno'd again, this time on a Mustang dyno. I don't recall the dyno #'s, but it was a lot less, as I couldn't lock the verter at WOT using the Compushift. We did a 1/4 mile simulation on the load dyno and it ran 11.2x.

Went to the track and ran 11.36 @ 120... not bad at all IMO

Moral to the story is, like Jon Janz said, don't worry about the dyno number, race it and see what it does.


Thanks for all the input fellas. No I haven't ran it at the track yet...I'm awaiting new shocks/springs. I'll post up some numbers once I get to the the track.

Originally Posted by Detoxx03
Matt,

Don't worry about the numbers just yet cause honestly I think they are on point. I think its more of a problem with your mods being slapped together and not match correctly. Get that suspension fixed and some track times first. You will eventually need a FAST intake and I think upgrading to a SS3600 stall will greatly benefit you too.

Hurry up and get it together so I can spank that *** again


Thanks. I'll be getting the FAST once I get my funds together, just not sure what to do about the mods being currently used. The only thing I can see that I could do to help besides the air intake/TB situation is the converter and possibly a custom grind cam. But I'm not sure if it's worth all the $ and labor costs to change out the cam at this time...

I'm also looking at lowering my shift point...I'm still on the fence on this and was hoping some members on here had some advice...anyone?

Hopefully I'll be getting most of the kinks out in the next month or so...

-Matt




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.