Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

iron 5.7 or aluminum 5.7?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2011, 11:55 AM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (34)
 
headed-ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I agree with predator on this. An ls1 block will hold power just fine for 90% of builds out there given the tune is good. I myself went with a iron block 347 because i could get it for 75 bucks rather then 300+ for an ls1. if you looking for an affordable block to get you where you want the iron will do great and hold up well.
Old 07-14-2011, 12:38 PM
  #22  
Staging Lane
 
revtech101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Newark, CA
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
It doesn't take much pregnition or detonation to crack the sleeves in an LS1 block. With an iron block, however, you would almost have to try to run 87 octane with 30psi of boost to crack the block.

The iron block is simply more forgiving if you trust your engine to the wrong tuner.
You will crush/spin your rod bearings with knock. Then the block will crack after your rods go right through it.

Knock will kill any motor period. I'm not even sure what you are implying here.... That the iron block will take more knock before it blows? Your motor is NOT suppose to knock in the first place.

You are going about this the wrong way.
Old 07-14-2011, 12:42 PM
  #23  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by revtech101
You will crush/spin your rod bearings with knock. Then the block will crack after your rods go right through it.

Knock will kill any motor period. I'm not even sure what you are implying here.... That the iron block will take more knock before it blows? Your motor is NOT suppose to knock in the first place.

You are going about this the wrong way.
I'm saying the iron block will survive a bad tune better than an aluminum block will. You can crack a LS1 sleeve from detonation before breaking a piston.

Am I the only one that read that the OP is worried more about reliability than weight?
Old 07-14-2011, 12:54 PM
  #24  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
aAZz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by headed-ws6
I agree with predator on this. An ls1 block will hold power just fine for 90% of builds out there given the tune is good. I myself went with a iron block 347 because i could get it for 75 bucks rather then 300+ for an ls1. if you looking for an affordable block to get you where you want the iron will do great and hold up well.
Any pics? Dyno numbers? How do u like it compared 2 a true ls1?
Old 07-14-2011, 01:28 PM
  #25  
Staging Lane
 
revtech101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Newark, CA
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
I'm saying the iron block will survive a bad tune better than an aluminum block will. You can crack a LS1 sleeve from detonation before breaking a piston.

Am I the only one that read that the OP is worried more about reliability than weight?
There is no such thing as reliability with a bad tune. If you are breaking your block, you have other issues to deal with. A good tuner is more important then choosing between an iron or aluminum block.
Old 07-14-2011, 02:13 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
aAZz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a good tuner down here in phx that knows his lsx motors so I'm good there guys. Lookin for performance but most importantly reliabilty plannin on a big cam and 100 shot of nitrous
Old 07-14-2011, 02:14 PM
  #27  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,760
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Am I the only one that read that the OP is worried more about reliability than weight?
I was wonderig the same thing, in fact I was the first person to chime in lol I'd love to go iron 347 but I don't want a stroked engine so I might have to go with a aluminum block for a 347

Last edited by King Nothing; 07-14-2011 at 03:10 PM.
Old 07-14-2011, 02:58 PM
  #28  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by revtech101
There is no such thing as reliability with a bad tune. If you are breaking your block, you have other issues to deal with. A good tuner is more important then choosing between an iron or aluminum block.
Sure there is. Poor tuning doesn't always destroy an engine, its the REALLY poor tuning that does. Like I said earlier, I have personally seen an engine with detonation issues that cracked the sleeve of the block before the piston gave up. I would consider a block that doesn't break before the OEM piston does to be more reliable than one that does, wouldn't you?

Originally Posted by King Nothing
I'd love to go iron 347 but I don't want a stroked engine so I might have to go with a aluminum block for a 347
You don't have to stroke an iron block to make it a 347. You just bore the cylinder out to 3.9xx" and use a stock 3.622" crank. That what I'm doing.
Old 07-14-2011, 03:11 PM
  #29  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,760
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
You don't have to stroke an iron block to make it a 347. You just bore the cylinder out to 3.9xx" and use a stock 3.622" crank. That what I'm doing.
Sweet thank you!!!!
Old 07-14-2011, 07:35 PM
  #30  
Staging Lane
 
revtech101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Newark, CA
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Sure there is. Poor tuning doesn't always destroy an engine, its the REALLY poor tuning that does. Like I said earlier, I have personally seen an engine with detonation issues that cracked the sleeve of the block before the piston gave up. I would consider a block that doesn't break before the OEM piston does to be more reliable than one that does, wouldn't you?



You don't have to stroke an iron block to make it a 347. You just bore the cylinder out to 3.9xx" and use a stock 3.622" crank. That what I'm doing.
Technically speaking, its not the really poor tuning that kills a block, its the over aggressive tune that does. I understand you saw what you saw but there is no reason to rule out the possibility of other variables that could have caused such a catastrophe. I once saw a dog walk on 2 legs on its own. Not for a second did I assume all dogs can pull this off.
Old 07-15-2011, 08:08 AM
  #31  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by revtech101
Technically speaking, its not the really poor tuning that kills a block, its the over aggressive tune that does.
Go ahead and explain how a tune that blows up the engine isn't a poor tune.

Originally Posted by revtech101
I understand you saw what you saw but there is no reason to rule out the possibility of other variables that could have caused such a catastrophe. I once saw a dog walk on 2 legs on its own. Not for a second did I assume all dogs can pull this off.
Well if the piston in the adjacent cylinder came apart, and the piston in the cylinder that cracked showed damage from detonation, there is no reason to believe aliens did it. That cylinder had detonation issues, no doubt about that, and as destructive as detonation is, there really is no reason to suspect anything else.
Old 07-15-2011, 01:04 PM
  #32  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (34)
 
headed-ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by aAZz
Any pics? Dyno numbers? How do u like it compared 2 a true ls1?
before i went boost the motor had a 02+ zo6 cam and stock 243's and full bolt ons and would hang with cammed ls1's. power is the same as a ls1 you just have an iron block instead of a aluminum block.
Old 07-15-2011, 01:34 PM
  #33  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
brianw401's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I feel that it depends on the tune. I know a couple of dudes that are making over 1,000whp. with aluminum blocks (however, they are not LS1). It couldn't hurt to go iron if you are shooting for huge power numbers. Iron won't flex as much under extreme heat & pressure like aluminum will.
Old 07-15-2011, 03:56 PM
  #34  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
aAZz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No power wit this block is a little over 450rwhp that id like 2 get. I'm goin 2 build a lq9 as well. Once that's done I'm putting this in my fox and lq9 on my nova
Old 07-16-2011, 11:27 AM
  #35  
Staging Lane
 
revtech101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Newark, CA
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Go ahead and explain how a tune that blows up the engine isn't a poor tune.



Well if the piston in the adjacent cylinder came apart, and the piston in the cylinder that cracked showed damage from detonation, there is no reason to believe aliens did it. That cylinder had detonation issues, no doubt about that, and as destructive as detonation is, there really is no reason to suspect anything else.
The clue to the destroyed block was detonation and yet you blame the aluminum block? Why? How did you reach that conclusion? The suspect was the tune as YOU clearly mentioned yourself.

I won't bother explaining a poor tune vs. an aggressive tune. Its just plain silly for me to try and explain that especially if you do not tune your own cars.
Old 07-16-2011, 01:58 PM
  #36  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by revtech101
The clue to the destroyed block was detonation and yet you blame the aluminum block? Why? How did you reach that conclusion? The suspect was the tune as YOU clearly mentioned yourself.

I won't bother explaining a poor tune vs. an aggressive tune. Its just plain silly for me to try and explain that especially if you do not tune your own cars.
The block cracked before the OEM piston, therefore, the block was the weaker link here. There's no doubt that detonation was the cause of all that damage, but it wasn't even that bad, and it should have been a case where all we had to replace were the pistons. Unfortunately, the block failed as well. The problem probably was the tune, but that's not really even relevant. My point this whole time is that an iron block will typically withstand more abuse than an aluminum LS1 block, so even if you get a bad tune or a bad tank of gas, at least you won't be having to replace the block.

Don't try to insult my intelligence to cop out of having to back up your BS. I'm not a tuner, but I've had enough experience in a dyno cell with the likes of Don Bailey and DaVnci to keep up with anything you have to say. So again, go ahead and explain.



Quick Reply: iron 5.7 or aluminum 5.7?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.