My LQ9 build. Opinions on milling
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My LQ9 build. Opinions on milling
I purchased an LQ9 out of a 2004 escalade and plan on doing a cheapish build for my TransAm. It has 10 to 1 compression with the stock 317 heads, and stock flat top pistons. I decided to port out the heads at home Here is a couple of pictures of some completed (ish) port and a stock ports. I didn't go crazy hogging everything out only cleaning up and removing a small amount of material along with taking some off around the valve guides. I just got numbers back and they were as follows :
Intake
.200/152
.300/210
.400/248
.500/267
.600/280
Exhaust
.200/119
.300/149
.400/179
.500/193
.600/210
This is without a valve job or cleaning up the chambers. My plan is too smooth out the chambers without taking too much out, and possibly a 3 angle valve job. I was also planning on milling heads .030 to get back anything lost from porting chambers and raising compression slightly. Any idea how much I can mill the heads without issues with my Fast 90mm intake bolting up, and if I would have issues with PTV clearance ? cam is only 222/224 .566/.568 @112 using stock rockers. I'll order pushrods after I decide on milling etc ... any opinions, ideas ? I am debating if I wanna open up the intake more or work more on the exhaust as I haven't removed a ton of material yet. I'm hoping for around 400 rwhp.
Thanks
P.S. I am using .051 crushed MLS gaskets
Intake
.200/152
.300/210
.400/248
.500/267
.600/280
Exhaust
.200/119
.300/149
.400/179
.500/193
.600/210
This is without a valve job or cleaning up the chambers. My plan is too smooth out the chambers without taking too much out, and possibly a 3 angle valve job. I was also planning on milling heads .030 to get back anything lost from porting chambers and raising compression slightly. Any idea how much I can mill the heads without issues with my Fast 90mm intake bolting up, and if I would have issues with PTV clearance ? cam is only 222/224 .566/.568 @112 using stock rockers. I'll order pushrods after I decide on milling etc ... any opinions, ideas ? I am debating if I wanna open up the intake more or work more on the exhaust as I haven't removed a ton of material yet. I'm hoping for around 400 rwhp.
Thanks
P.S. I am using .051 crushed MLS gaskets
Last edited by Mrbowtie26; 09-07-2013 at 11:15 PM.
#5
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks.
I have since ported a bit more out to bring the intake and the exhaust cfm up a bit more . I'll have them flow tested again after I clean up the chambers and get the heads milled. I'm debating between .030 and .040 milling. I think with my cam I can probably do .040 without ptv issues just not sure.
I have since ported a bit more out to bring the intake and the exhaust cfm up a bit more . I'll have them flow tested again after I clean up the chambers and get the heads milled. I'm debating between .030 and .040 milling. I think with my cam I can probably do .040 without ptv issues just not sure.
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Senior Member
I hope you considered DCR with such a small cam. Too much mill and you'll have detonation and that would negate any benefits of compression increase.
First Q you should answer is what fuel do you plan on using. Based on that calculate your DCR and do not go over 8.5.
First Q you should answer is what fuel do you plan on using. Based on that calculate your DCR and do not go over 8.5.
#11
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks
#12
TECH Senior Member
You are still going about this wrong. First figure out your DCR at desired SCR so you can see if it is fuel compatible. This will help you mill the exact amount needed to optimize your cam potential. Throwing static compression number around does nothing to maximize the cam potential.
DCR= Dynamic compression (important part), DCR is constant so that is what is used to be fuel octane compatible not SCR= Static compression.
DCR= Dynamic compression (important part), DCR is constant so that is what is used to be fuel octane compatible not SCR= Static compression.
#13
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are still going about this wrong. First figure out your DCR at desired SCR so you can see if it is fuel compatible. This will help you mill the exact amount needed to optimize your cam potential. Throwing static compression number around does nothing to maximize the cam potential.
DCR= Dynamic compression (important part), DCR is constant so that is what is used to be fuel octane compatible not SCR= Static compression.
DCR= Dynamic compression (important part), DCR is constant so that is what is used to be fuel octane compatible not SCR= Static compression.
Now if I get the chambers down to 66cc that will give me SRC 10.95:1 and DCR of 8.49:1 which would be ideal I think considering I'll be running 92-93 octane correct ?
Last edited by Mrbowtie26; 09-11-2013 at 12:57 AM.
#17
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the chambers I'm not looking to remove much material just smooth it out a bit to reduce hot spots etc ... I didn't think it would change size more than 1cc or so maybe 2 max which I can easily pick back up through milling.