Guys with Tsunami or MS4 Cam Please Step In
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guys with Tsunami or MS4 Cam Please Step In
Debating between these two cams. The lift kind of makes me nervous. What lifters are you guys running with these cams? How long have you been running your car with one of these two cams in it? How often are you replacing your valve springs? Did you flycut your pistons? General precaution questions. Obviously you will need to measure PTV clearance when running such a big cam.
#2
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
You won't have to flycut your pistons. You won't be changing valve springs unless you are driving the car literally every day all the time. Both of those cams suck imo and you would be better off getting a custom grind cam from someone. If you are dead set on those cams you better be getting just about every supporting mod possible for it to work right.
#3
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hayward CA
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im running a ms4 with ls7 lifters and btr springs..no fly cut was required... All this backed by a th400 with a 4400 hughes stall and and a 12 bolt...been driving it for 2yrs so far
#4
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You won't have to flycut your pistons. You won't be changing valve springs unless you are driving the car literally every day all the time. Both of those cams suck imo and you would be better off getting a custom grind cam from someone. If you are dead set on those cams you better be getting just about every supporting mod possible for it to work right.
Mods are...
Fast 92/92 (FAST 38# Injectors)
PRC Stage 1 243 Heads
MS4 Cam on 111 LSA
BTR Dual Valve Springs with Steel Retainers
Debating on which lifter to get due to high RPM bleedoff
TSP 1-7/8" Headers
3" X-Pipe
4.10 gears with TA girdle cover
Monster Stage 2 clutch
#5
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
I had it, only reason the motor let go was due to a broken valve spring which was my fault during a downshift, daily'd the car for 2 years before that, and the previous owner had it for a year or two before, all on PRC .650 springs. No signs of float or anything before that.
#6
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had it, only reason the motor let go was due to a broken valve spring which was my fault during a downshift, daily'd the car for 2 years before that, and the previous owner had it for a year or two before, all on PRC .650 springs. No signs of float or anything before that.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
I've been running my MS4 for almost 8 years. I did have to cut the pistons, but my heads are milled with 2.04 intake valves and a thin head gasket. Stock replacement LS7 lifters. Still on the same PRC springs my heads came with back when I built it. I had the springs tested back several years ago and all were within a few pounds of the advertised specs. Maybe 15,000 miles on them? That's the only time I've opened up the motor since the build. It sees 7000rpm every time I drive it, and I've never had any kind of mechanical issue.
#9
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suppose that I could go with the polluter, but I have the MS4 sitting at the house. The only time that I'm on the throttle hard, is when I'm already rolling. I don't do any races from a dig. Might as well not, these 10 bolts are crap.
Aside from that, even with my 224R the powerband dramatically increases around 4500 RPM's. That really doesn't bother me. Now if I had 1-3/4" headers, my powerband would probably occur much sooner.
Aside from that, even with my 224R the powerband dramatically increases around 4500 RPM's. That really doesn't bother me. Now if I had 1-3/4" headers, my powerband would probably occur much sooner.
#10
Staging Lane
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cincinnati Area
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You won't have to flycut your pistons. You won't be changing valve springs unless you are driving the car literally every day all the time. Both of those cams suck imo and you would be better off getting a custom grind cam from someone. If you are dead set on those cams you better be getting just about every supporting mod possible for it to work right.
#16
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
Between the two I would personally choose the Tsunami camshaft for your set up for more power under the curve. You would only be giving up around 5rwhp up top compared to the MS3/MS4 cams. Now if you wish to get a custom cam give me a call and I can spec you a cam specifially for your combination and if you would like softer lobes we can spec one with softer lobes as well.
Lonnie
Lonnie
__________________
NOW OFFERING TSP BY YANK CONVERTERS
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - WISECO PISTONS - LUNATI - CALLIES - NEW TSP BRAND CRANK & RODS - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - ARH HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - PRECISION INDUSTRIES - YANK - CIRCLE D - AND MORE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - WISECO PISTONS - LUNATI - CALLIES - NEW TSP BRAND CRANK & RODS - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - ARH HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - PRECISION INDUSTRIES - YANK - CIRCLE D - AND MORE!
NEW NUMBER (512)863-0900
#17
Been running the tsunami for about 6 months now, no mechanical probs as of yet. I can tell a loss of low end, but I put 4.10's in and helped. Recently went to a th350 and it's literally a slug now. I'm hoping to fix that with a fti 36-3800 stall, if that don't help I'm going with something smaller I guess.
#18
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think when running these large cams people got to keep in mind to add the suppoting mods to go with it..i have TSP 5.3 heads..my buddy has the same heads and their 233/239 cam..but he has 3200 stall 323 gear he complains bout low end etc driveability...now me my cam is almost identical..232/238..BUT 3:73 gear and 4200 stall...no low end loss or driveability issues with mine...when people step up to larger cams for that extra 15rwp keep in mind what you might want to change if ypu wan ti to act the way it did before you made that cam swap..
#20
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
i think when running these large cams people got to keep in mind to add the suppoting mods to go with it..i have TSP 5.3 heads..my buddy has the same heads and their 233/239 cam..but he has 3200 stall 323 gear he complains bout low end etc driveability...now me my cam is almost identical..232/238..BUT 3:73 gear and 4200 stall...no low end loss or driveability issues with mine...when people step up to larger cams for that extra 15rwp keep in mind what you might want to change if ypu wan ti to act the way it did before you made that cam swap..