Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Opinion on new cam for 4.8 in 99 Silverado

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2015, 04:35 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Eddie1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Opinion on new cam for 4.8 in 99 Silverado

I have a 1999 Silverado with the 4.8. It has 862 cathedral heads. I want good cam sound and drive-ability on street and strip. Looking to get a LS 255/261 525"/525" 114°. Any input is appreciated.
Old 10-29-2015, 09:46 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
mjs1012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Stratford, CT
Posts: 2,687
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Take a look at this for an idea. I'm pretty sure you don't need a different converter to run this cam.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...hp-22rwtq.html
Old 10-30-2015, 12:50 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
SSEUL8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Anything around 208/212 or 212/218 is what I would run in my 4.8 if I decided to cam swap it. I wouldn't over cam a 4.8 in a truck. It's low compression, low displacement in a 4400 lb vehicle.
Old 10-30-2015, 12:58 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
spawne32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

did i read 255/261 correctly? you are talking advanced duration right? I wouldnt run anything over 210 duration on either the intake or exhaust. My 214/220 in my 5.3 pushed my powerband up pretty high as it was.
Old 10-30-2015, 04:57 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

First, cams are usually discussed in .050" duration not advertised.
Second when comparing 5.3l results the smaller displacement will show compromises sooner, while the above linked cam might be fine in a 5.3 with stock stall that does NOT mean a 4.8l will be.
I wouldn't try a bigger cam in a 4.8 without the expectation of needing a higher stall.
Old 10-30-2015, 07:14 AM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Eddie1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I plan on using a stall converter. That is advertised duration. Specs show
Application: Chevrolet Gen III/IV LS Series 3-Bolt 1997-Present
Ignition Firing Order: OE (1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3)
Cam Style: Hydraulic Roller (with Cathedral Port Heads)
Basic RPM Range: 1000-5600
Manufacturers Description: Big torque in 4.8L, 5.3L, or 5.7L. Needs good intake and exhaust.
Intake Duration @ .050": 208
Exhaust Duration @ .050": 214
Advertised Intake Duration (@ .006"): 255
Advertised Exhaust Duration (@ .006"): 261
Intake Valve Lift with OE Rocker Ratio (1.70): .525"
Exhaust Valve Lift with OE Rocker Ratio (1.70): .525"
Intake Lobe Lift: .308"
Exhaust Lobe Lift: .308"
Intake Valve Lift with 1.72 Rocker Ratio: .531"
Intake Valve Lift with 1.75 Rocker Ratio: .540"
Intake Valve Lift with 1.80 Rocker Ratio: .556"
Exhaust Valve Lift with 1.72 Rocker Ratio: .531"
Exhaust Valve Lift with 1.75 Rocker Ratio: .540"
Exhaust Valve Lift with 1.80 Rocker Ratio: .556"
Lobe Separation Angle: 114 Degrees
Intake Centerline: 110 Degrees
Lifters Included: No
Small Base Circle: No
Cam Gear Attachment: 3-Bolt
Valve Adjustment: Zero Lash Plus ½ Turn
Manufacturer: Howards Cams & Racing Components
Manufacturer's Part Number: 192705-14
Weight: 10.0 lbs.

I have looked at several and this was recommended by Howard's Cams. Just need input on whether this is going to give me the sound I want and still be a good driver.
Old 10-30-2015, 08:34 AM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,743
Received 537 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Sound is not all in the cam.... lobe separation angle is part of it but a lot of it is in the tune.
Old 10-30-2015, 12:03 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

I'm actually surprised by how different this is compared to both Kip's and Martin's truck cams.

Kip's truck cam:
205/210 .510/.510 115+4
16.5, 41.5, 36, 6

Martin:
206/206 .560/.540 114+4
15, 41, 33, 7

Your Howard cam:
208/214 .525/.525 114-4
6, 34, 45, 11
Old 10-30-2015, 12:37 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Eddie1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have not been able to find much info on this particular one.
Old 10-30-2015, 01:00 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

What information are you looking for?

The numbers separated by commas are the IVO, IVC, EVO, EVC events (respectively). You can't get much more detailed information than that.

As for real world results for that particular cam in a vehicle comparable to yours... I have nothing.
Old 10-30-2015, 01:24 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Eddie1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidBoren
What information are you looking for?

The numbers separated by commas are the IVO, IVC, EVO, EVC events (respectively). You can't get much more detailed information than that.

As for real world results for that particular cam in a vehicle comparable to yours... I have nothing.
That is what I am looking for lol. Someone who possibly has used this one.



Quick Reply: Opinion on new cam for 4.8 in 99 Silverado



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.