Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

texas speed rocker arms update?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2018, 07:37 PM
  #101  
Teching In
 
John_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: TN
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
Because they aren't stock rockers. Even if they are stock replacement, it's not the same. That would account for the grinding some people are having to do. Which is pretty common with aftermarket rockers anyway.

Also, if you look at T&D or Crower products for the LS3, they do show the offset as different on the intake side between the GM LS3 and TFS LS3. Point is, the TFS LS3 head is not stock either.
Seems TSP and TFS say they work fine.

Read here: https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...low-heads.html
Old 08-26-2018, 09:12 PM
  #102  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

In that thread, neither company had actually tested it. It's a known practice that you're an R&D guinea pig for everything you buy--especially low volume custom stuff. If somebody is having issues with something, it's probably the first time anybody has heard of it. And this isn't a bash on any vendor. But this is common knowledge for this type of stuff. It's just the way hot rodding works. They don't have the time or resources or financial investment to test all combinations.

I'm just stating that other rockers typically have a different part number for TFS heads as the offset is usually slightly different from a GM casting. Take it for what it's worth.
Old 08-26-2018, 10:18 PM
  #103  
Teching In
 
John_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: TN
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
In that thread, neither company had actually tested it. It's a known practice that you're an R&D guinea pig for everything you buy--especially low volume custom stuff. If somebody is having issues with something, it's probably the first time anybody has heard of it. And this isn't a bash on any vendor. But this is common knowledge for this type of stuff. It's just the way hot rodding works. They don't have the time or resources or financial investment to test all combinations.

I'm just stating that other rockers typically have a different part number for TFS heads as the offset is usually slightly different from a GM casting. Take it for what it's worth.
Ehh.... I've not seen nor heard of any issues with them.

I've run them in my daily driven 2010 SS with no issues for over 10k miles, so all is good as far as I'm concerned.
Old 08-26-2018, 11:24 PM
  #104  
Registered User
 
William Odenbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: kingston on. canada
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

What happened to building reliable on the cheap?
Old 08-27-2018, 10:49 AM
  #105  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by William Odenbach
What happened to building reliable on the cheap?
Because reliable is rarely cheap....
Old 08-27-2018, 05:17 PM
  #106  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
01CamaroSSTx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 4,981
Received 1,786 Likes on 1,293 Posts
Default

Got that right!
Old 09-02-2018, 07:59 PM
  #107  
Teching In
 
Y2K-WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hutto, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've got them in my SBE LS2 with TFS225's & G6X3. they work great.
Old 09-03-2018, 01:30 PM
  #108  
TECH Resident
 
NSFW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 814
Received 117 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Is the valve tip wipe pattern less critical with these than with stock rockers? I was kind of amazed that thunderstruck507 managed to get both lash and wipe correct with solid lifters and using shims to adjust stock rockers... so I wonder if you could use these with solid lifters, use shims to dial in the lash, and not worry much about the tip wipe. Or would that just be asking for trouble?
Old 09-06-2018, 05:20 PM
  #109  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 2,122
Received 197 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Y2K-WS6
I've got them in my SBE LS2 with TFS225's & G6X3. they work great.
What is the part number on them TSP rockers? What kind of push rods are you running?

I was thinking of pairing these rocker arms with some .660" BTR springs and Morel 5206 linkbar lifters in those TFS225's. LQ9 408 with an S485 turbo. BTR 3 cam or custom grind.

I know you need rocker arm pedestals 12552203 with stock GM rockers W0133-1763277 but I'm told these won't work with TFS225 heads. Do the TSP rockers come with everything needed?

I'm shooting for 10:1 compression. Can go 61cc with 20cc dish pistons or 64cc with 15 dish pistons, but I think the 64cc are factory casting on these heads?
Old 09-10-2018, 08:26 PM
  #110  
Teching In
 
Y2K-WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hutto, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5.7stroker
What is the part number on them TSP rockers? What kind of push rods are you running?

I was thinking of pairing these rocker arms with some .660" BTR springs and Morel 5206 linkbar lifters in those TFS225's. LQ9 408 with an S485 turbo. BTR 3 cam or custom grind.

I know you need rocker arm pedestals 12552203 with stock GM rockers W0133-1763277 but I'm told these won't work with TFS225 heads. Do the TSP rockers come with everything needed?

I'm shooting for 10:1 compression. Can go 61cc with 20cc dish pistons or 64cc with 15 dish pistons, but I think the 64cc are factory casting on these heads?
Here's the part number on the rockers:
25-TSP172RR-CATH-CHE - Texas Speed & Perfromance Steel 1.72 Ratio Roller Rocker Package With CHE Bushings for Cathedral Port Cylinder Heads
I also used manton 11/32 pushrods, and morel link-bars. I used the stock LS2 rocker pedestals with the tabs removed. We milled the heads to 61cc and used .040 cometics... I did not need to fly-cut. These heads are/were 64cc stock, if I recall correctly. My TFS 225's are using the stock valves, and bronze guides, with upgraded springs and titanium retainers.

Last edited by Y2K-WS6; 09-11-2018 at 07:19 AM.
Old 09-11-2018, 09:05 AM
  #111  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 2,122
Received 197 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Thanks again for this info!
Old 09-19-2018, 08:32 PM
  #112  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
z-maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 1,287
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Saw this posted on the TSP Facebook page. Updates might be coming?

Old 09-19-2018, 09:04 PM
  #113  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Wow! A new polymer rocker? They do NOT look like metal of any kind...
Old 09-19-2018, 09:24 PM
  #114  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
MUL8NO1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default More pics of TSP Steele Roller Tips (in Darton Sleeved Forged 427ci etc)

I’m nearing first run of new 427ci using my PRC heads with Fuuuul work done - the slight variation in rocker ratio was considered during parts list to include cam specs and valve events / timing...


Soldiered up in a row... on top of PAC polished springs, fancy valves, PRC work, etc...


Last edited by MUL8NO1; 09-19-2018 at 09:31 PM. Reason: Trying to add pics for you all...
Old 09-19-2018, 10:28 PM
  #115  
TECH Resident
 
NSFW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 814
Received 117 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Wow! A new polymer rocker? They do NOT look like metal of any kind...
Looks like 3D-printed prototypes. Adjustable lash versions coming soon?
Old 09-19-2018, 10:31 PM
  #116  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NSFW
Looks like 3D-printed prototypes. Adjustable lash versions coming soon?
THAT would make more sense!
Old 09-20-2018, 09:15 AM
  #117  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
z-maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 1,287
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

This was the caption on the picture; "Some 3d printed prototypes we use to help us out through some of the later stages of development! Next stop finished product!"
The following users liked this post:
Hardtop (01-26-2021)
Old 09-20-2018, 11:54 AM
  #118  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z-camaro
This was the caption on the picture; "Some 3d printed prototypes we use to help us out through some of the later stages of development! Next stop finished product!"
Thanks! The caption didn't make the cut to here, I guess..
Old 10-25-2018, 11:52 PM
  #119  
TECH Fanatic
 
xdanny510x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hayward CA
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default How would these affect the ratio/lift with a vvt4.2

Would i run into any problems running the vvt 4.2 cam with these rockers

Last edited by xdanny510x; 10-26-2018 at 01:56 AM. Reason: Add
Old 10-26-2018, 05:36 AM
  #120  
Teching In
 
John_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: TN
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With the VVT 3.2 cam and the TSP 1.72:1 roller rockers, my valve lift was 657 intake.

I also had rocker arm contact with the stock L99 valve covers, so I swapped on the Holley tall covers. https://www.holley.com/products/acce.../parts/241-111

But I have TFS GenX 255 heads....






Originally Posted by xdanny510x
Would i run into any problems running the vvt 4.2 cam with these rockers





Last edited by John_C; 10-26-2018 at 05:42 AM.


Quick Reply: texas speed rocker arms update?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.