Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

223 sportsman heads and cam mamo build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2017, 02:20 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 223 sportsman heads and cam mamo build



Old and new tune













Edit... FINALLY posted some pictures... This is the second time ive built this motor. 02 z28 camaro 6 speed with 9" rear with 4.11 gears. The first build I put in scat rods and mauhle -4cc pistons. all arp bolts. tv2 cam, 243 heads, ls7 lifters 7.4 pushrods and ls6 intake. decked the block and milled the heads. Motor had 10.9.1cr. kooks 1 3/4 headers with true dual 3" dumped. With a Pat G tune it made 438/405.

After breaking a valve spring and finding helicoils in my rocker bolt holes (not being able to tourque the bolts down) i replaced all the springs and two helicoils that come out put it back together and after two weeks the bolts popped out... My wife told me to just go ahead and buy the heads i wanted so that is when i found Tony Mamo and his new sportsman heads...

After tony schooled me on a few things I ended up going with the sportsman 223 milled to 56cc with hollow valves and yella terra rockers... few weeks later I told my wife i need a cam to match these heads, so I got tony to spec one out for me... 235/240 615/620 113+3 cam. cosmetic .054 gasket for 11.4cr and also went ahead and ordered some short travel johnson lifters and measured the pushrods for a few different custom sizes... the kicker with all this is i still have my ls6 intake and change my exhaust to 2.5" dual with x pipe all the way back through single chamber mufflers and cme.

So now that it runs and drives (by the way tony it sounds great!) I have contacted Pat G to get another tune in, hopefully to get some better numbers under the curve as well as at the top!

Last edited by caturnbull1; 09-17-2017 at 02:20 AM. Reason: Pictures
Old 04-13-2017, 09:13 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BREWS02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Sounds like a fun combo! We need a video to confirm the great sound, though

Any idea when you'll go for the intake/exhaust upgrades?
Old 04-13-2017, 09:43 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm keeping the exhaust like it is or will go to 3 inch. I wanted duals all the way out the back but also wanted to lower the car some so that's why I went with 2.5", the intake will be when I get some bills payed off. Also have my first baby due in about three weeks so that will put a damper on getting a intake. I'll get a video soon, probably this weekend
Old 04-14-2017, 03:11 PM
  #4  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

excuse it being dirty still need to wash it!
Old 04-15-2017, 04:11 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BREWS02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Sounds really good man! What dual setup did you use? I need to convert mine over one of these days.
Old 04-16-2017, 02:32 AM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's just a custom setup. I did a lot of research and screenshot pictures, bought the single chamber mufflers, x pipe, and CME off eBay then brought it to a shop and they did it lol... If I would do it again I'd probably go with speedenginering. I had there headers on my last car and liked them alot I figured the duals would be nice also as well as affordable
Old 04-26-2017, 06:41 PM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well brought it to Pat g. They have updated the dyno since last time I brought it. They told me it read about 5% less than most other dynos. Also the motor was not getting enough air. Results better heads and a bigger cam 432hp/409tq. Lost HP gain a few tq. Guess it's time for a fast intake now
Old 04-26-2017, 07:38 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
 
slogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 985
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Yikes!!!
Old 04-26-2017, 07:44 PM
  #9  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Were the 243 heads worked at all? Or just stock and milled?
Old 04-26-2017, 09:01 PM
  #10  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah but looked horrible.
Old 04-26-2017, 09:02 PM
  #11  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was just the ends of the runners not the entire runner. Also had valve job
Old 04-27-2017, 09:12 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
slogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 985
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by caturnbull1
Yeah but looked horrible.
So in this case the ugly duckling was worth more than the showpiece.
Old 04-28-2017, 08:08 AM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
z-maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 1,288
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Just wondering, can you feel the ~25 ft-lb difference around 2200 RPM that the graph shows? How does the car feel after the new mods, and do you have any before track times to compare to?
Old 04-28-2017, 10:02 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Pretty sure more than just the intake is wrong here. I'd be really pissed after blowing that kind of dough and not getting a return on my money.
Old 04-28-2017, 11:50 AM
  #15  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Driving wise from a roll at 2000 rpms 1st gear blew the tires off in 1st 2nd and 3rd with nito 555s the last build from a roll like that would barely spin. I wonder what the fast intake would do on the 243 heads vs the Mamo heads. I would think that the 243 heads were peaked out almost where as the Mamo heads are starving for air.
Old 04-28-2017, 11:51 AM
  #16  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also the 25' lbs around 2200 are the last tune z camaro
Old 04-28-2017, 01:03 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Don't get me wrong, a FAST intake will help a lot, but it would have also helped quite a bit with the old setup. I do think you are correct that the current intake is more of a restriction now than it was, but how much I don't know.
Old 04-28-2017, 01:10 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
z-maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 1,288
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by caturnbull1
Driving wise from a roll at 2000 rpms 1st gear blew the tires off in 1st 2nd and 3rd with nito 555s the last build from a roll like that would barely spin. I wonder what the fast intake would do on the 243 heads vs the Mamo heads. I would think that the 243 heads were peaked out almost where as the Mamo heads are starving for air.
Originally Posted by caturnbull1
Also the 25' lbs around 2200 are the last tune z camaro
Originally Posted by caturnbull1
Well brought it to Pat g. They have updated the dyno since last time I brought it. They told me it read about 5% less than most other dynos. Also the motor was not getting enough air. Results better heads and a bigger cam 432hp/409tq. Lost HP gain a few tq. Guess it's time for a fast intake now
I am assuming that the old setup is the dark blue and dark red lines since you said with the new setup you lost a few hp but gained a few tq. If so your new setup is down ~25 ft-lbs compared to the old at 2200 RPM yet it now blows the tires off and wouldn't with the old setup? This is kinda contradictory (save for the road and tire conditions). Could just be the dyno then.

Let me know if I am not interpreting the graph correctly.
Old 04-28-2017, 01:30 PM
  #19  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
caturnbull1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: orange, texas
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, correct. The old set up had more HP and tq at the 2200rpm... But the old set up was also on their old dyno set up. They said the new computer on the dyno is very stingy and if I would to bring it to Houston it would read 5% more. So if that's true the dynos in Houston would read around 453hp and 429tq
Old 04-28-2017, 04:39 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
98cherrySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 801
Received 59 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by caturnbull1
It was just the ends of the runners not the entire runner. Also had valve job
The valve job, as most know, will make or break the performance of the heads as a whole. What was the target RWHP goal?


Quick Reply: 223 sportsman heads and cam mamo build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.