New Summit Pro LS Cams
#21
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes
on
618 Posts
Agreed. I no longer have the kit as I switched to a CHE kit and could not be happier. I have a customer that manufactures bearings and they performed an analysis on the trunnion. It was 50 HRc at the most and the finish on some of them was between 29 and 32 Ra. Definitely not bearing quality. The bearing were Made In USA though, which I was quite surprised about. With a better quality trunnion, this would probably be a cherry kit!
I live about 30 minutes drive from Summit in Tallmadge, Ohio and have been purchasing from them for 35 years now. They are a great place to deal with even with their large size. I had an issue with the starter I bought for my LS3 and it was past warranty. I called them, had a new one the next day, and I returned the old one under warranty and I did not pay a dime for shipping or anything.
I live about 30 minutes drive from Summit in Tallmadge, Ohio and have been purchasing from them for 35 years now. They are a great place to deal with even with their large size. I had an issue with the starter I bought for my LS3 and it was past warranty. I called them, had a new one the next day, and I returned the old one under warranty and I did not pay a dime for shipping or anything.
The following users liked this post:
Qdttracer9 (03-15-2021)
#22
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes
on
618 Posts
Hello all, we pulled random samples off our shelf and checked piston to valve clearance on the largest three of the latest Summit Pro LS cams. We used a box stock LS3 with little run time because it has true flat tops and the large intake valve diameters (compared to cathedral ports). This particular engine has .128 in. intake valve-drop, .007 in. positive deck, a .054 head gasket and we used checking springs for this test. We tested from TDC to 20 degrees in 2 degree increments, but the closest points were at 8 degrees I&E on all three cams. Generally we recommend for .060 intake clearance and .090 in. exhaust, but you'll see others run a little less or a little more..
Our Stage 3 LS3 cam (SUM-8710 230/242 113 +3 .625/.605) had .081 in. intake and .103 in. exhaust clearance.
Our Stage 4 LS3 cam (SUM-8711 234/247 113 +3.5 .625/.605) had .076 in. intake and .096 in. exhaust clearance.
We have another Stage 4 cam (SUM-8709 237/246 113 + 3 .625/.605) that's a little larger even yet and is primarily considered a Cathedral port cam, but will work well on a Rectangle port engine as well. It measures .061 in. on the intake and .092 in. on the exhaust. This is tight and we wouldn't recommend any head milling at all.
We wanted to share this with you to give you an idea of how much the heads could be milled. Keep in mind, we ALWAYS recommend checking piston to valve clearance before milling heads and final installation. Valve drop varies between heads and this is with a new timing chain, These particular cams happen to have a 110 ICL and thats where they ended up going in with a standard GM timing gears.
Our Stage 3 LS3 cam (SUM-8710 230/242 113 +3 .625/.605) had .081 in. intake and .103 in. exhaust clearance.
Our Stage 4 LS3 cam (SUM-8711 234/247 113 +3.5 .625/.605) had .076 in. intake and .096 in. exhaust clearance.
We have another Stage 4 cam (SUM-8709 237/246 113 + 3 .625/.605) that's a little larger even yet and is primarily considered a Cathedral port cam, but will work well on a Rectangle port engine as well. It measures .061 in. on the intake and .092 in. on the exhaust. This is tight and we wouldn't recommend any head milling at all.
We wanted to share this with you to give you an idea of how much the heads could be milled. Keep in mind, we ALWAYS recommend checking piston to valve clearance before milling heads and final installation. Valve drop varies between heads and this is with a new timing chain, These particular cams happen to have a 110 ICL and thats where they ended up going in with a standard GM timing gears.
#23
I am happy to see summit pullung off good LS CAMS.
I had good experience with summit sbc solid cams in the past.
i wonder if any of your pro ls cams have been CA smog tested? None of the cams seem to pass just by the specs.
on the other hand what woukd be your suggestion
to a LS1 (stock) with longtubes?
(valvetrain spring upgrade for sure)
And LS1 with ls6 top end and cnc ported 235 cfm ls6 heads. Longtubes
as nasty as possible for a street car!!
WILD IDLE BRUTE POWER MIX.
car is a manual C5.
I had good experience with summit sbc solid cams in the past.
i wonder if any of your pro ls cams have been CA smog tested? None of the cams seem to pass just by the specs.
on the other hand what woukd be your suggestion
to a LS1 (stock) with longtubes?
(valvetrain spring upgrade for sure)
And LS1 with ls6 top end and cnc ported 235 cfm ls6 heads. Longtubes
as nasty as possible for a street car!!
WILD IDLE BRUTE POWER MIX.
car is a manual C5.
#25
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes
on
618 Posts
I am happy to see summit pullung off good LS CAMS.
I had good experience with summit sbc solid cams in the past.
i wonder if any of your pro ls cams have been CA smog tested? None of the cams seem to pass just by the specs.
on the other hand what woukd be your suggestion
to a LS1 (stock) with longtubes?
(valvetrain spring upgrade for sure)
And LS1 with ls6 top end and cnc ported 235 cfm ls6 heads. Longtubes
as nasty as possible for a street car!!
WILD IDLE BRUTE POWER MIX.
car is a manual C5.
I had good experience with summit sbc solid cams in the past.
i wonder if any of your pro ls cams have been CA smog tested? None of the cams seem to pass just by the specs.
on the other hand what woukd be your suggestion
to a LS1 (stock) with longtubes?
(valvetrain spring upgrade for sure)
And LS1 with ls6 top end and cnc ported 235 cfm ls6 heads. Longtubes
as nasty as possible for a street car!!
WILD IDLE BRUTE POWER MIX.
car is a manual C5.
#27
Yes, none have been smog tested and aren't for legal for sale or use in Pollution controlled vehicles. Summit Racing has been actively working on C.a.r.b. approved projects though -so stay tuned. I don't know that such a cam would ever be described as a WILD IDLE BRUTE POWER MIX though
Ls1 with ls6 top end and longtubes.
Looking for a agressive sounding and performing street cam
#28
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes
on
618 Posts
Idle and part throttle response are mostly a function of intake opening (half the overlap equation). It's a little more important than the exhaust valve closing part. This is because Idle vacuum will be highly negative and exhaust pipe pressure will be slightly positive. Flow wants to go the wrong way (at idle and part throttle especially). At WOT, the pressure differential is much closer and why overlap becomes a positive thing.
The way a lot of sleeper cams work is to close the the exhaust valve before tdc. You still get the benefits of later intake closing and slightly earlier opening...which are the most important events.
Where else will you see this happening? Turbo cams! Especially single turbo cams (for similar but more critical reasons). Our SUM-8706 Stage 2 turbo cam would be an example of this (2 degrees of overlap is pretty minimal with valve timing events similar to a Sloppy stage 2 cam). It's a little on the large side though because the intake is opening at 4btdc.
Although we are working on our own lineup, Summit Racing equipment carries a number of great turbo cams from Cam Motion, Comp, Howard's and others that are single pattern or reverse split. About the easiest thing to do would be to do a search on Gen. 3/4 turbo cams and limit your intake duration to 220 and below with wider lobe separation numbers. I hope this is helpful.
Last edited by Summitracing; 08-28-2018 at 12:40 PM.
#29
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (37)
I saw your SUM-8712 when looking for a fairly mild cam for my 5.3 LM 4 swap going into my Durango. I saw where you are coming out with a higher lift version SUM-8719. It is not on your site. Do you have an ETA for that cam, will it be the same price, and do you think it would be worthwhile in my setup? Details:
1998 Durango, about 5K pounds. 4x4, 3.92 gear sets, 4L80 trans, stock stall converter.
2004 LM4 aluminum block 5.3L Gen 3 V8, stock 862 heads (can change springs if needed, it looks like the 8712 does not require that).
LS2 intake (for height/clearance) and generic 96mm throttle body.
1&3/4 long tube headers, 3" single exhaust.
Smog is not an issue where I am.
1998 Durango, about 5K pounds. 4x4, 3.92 gear sets, 4L80 trans, stock stall converter.
2004 LM4 aluminum block 5.3L Gen 3 V8, stock 862 heads (can change springs if needed, it looks like the 8712 does not require that).
LS2 intake (for height/clearance) and generic 96mm throttle body.
1&3/4 long tube headers, 3" single exhaust.
Smog is not an issue where I am.
#30
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes
on
618 Posts
I saw your SUM-8712 when looking for a fairly mild cam for my 5.3 LM 4 swap going into my Durango. I saw where you are coming out with a higher lift version SUM-8719. It is not on your site. Do you have an ETA for that cam, will it be the same price, and do you think it would be worthwhile in my setup? Details:
1998 Durango, about 5K pounds. 4x4, 3.92 gear sets, 4L80 trans, stock stall converter.
2004 LM4 aluminum block 5.3L Gen 3 V8, stock 862 heads (can change springs if needed, it looks like the 8712 does not require that).
LS2 intake (for height/clearance) and generic 96mm throttle body.
1&3/4 long tube headers, 3" single exhaust.
Smog is not an issue where I am.
1998 Durango, about 5K pounds. 4x4, 3.92 gear sets, 4L80 trans, stock stall converter.
2004 LM4 aluminum block 5.3L Gen 3 V8, stock 862 heads (can change springs if needed, it looks like the 8712 does not require that).
LS2 intake (for height/clearance) and generic 96mm throttle body.
1&3/4 long tube headers, 3" single exhaust.
Smog is not an issue where I am.
Last edited by Summitracing; 09-19-2018 at 08:10 AM.
#31
TECH Senior Member
Going by your numbers, overlap actually works out to -11 degrees.
209 + 217= 426 which divided by 2 is 213.
112 LSA x 2 = 224.
213 - 224 = -11 degrees.
Sound right to you?
209 + 217= 426 which divided by 2 is 213.
112 LSA x 2 = 224.
213 - 224 = -11 degrees.
Sound right to you?
#32
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes
on
618 Posts
What do those numbers look like on a cam card? As much as we hate rounding, we left the numbers in full one degree increments instead of .25 or .5 degree numbers. In the case of the SUM-8712 and SUM-8719, the numbers are IVO -6, IVC 36, EVO 42, EVC -4. If we enter those numbers into a calculator, it might tell you it's a 210/218 112 +1 instead of 209/217 112+1. Why is that?
The cam lobe designer doesn't like to round much either to get their lobe dynamics right. Frankly we'd rather have them get the lobe right than split mathematical hairs so they have a window. IVO between -5.5 to -6.25, IVC between 35.5 to 36.25, EVO between 41.5 to 42.25, and EVC between -3.5 to -4.25. Looking at both lows or both highs on the IVO/IVC and EVO/EVC would tell us we have 210/218 lobes. In reality they were both skewed between the closer of the two points resulting in a 209.25/217.25 cam with 10.5 degrees of overlap. We've labeled it a 209/217 duration as it's closer to reality than compromise and call it a 210/218. Stacking these rounding errors helps explain why Duration/LSA/Advance/Overlap numbers get skewed in a hurry and it's best just to think of them as concepts.
Another thing to mention is the lobes are asymmetrical. If we used the physical centerlines to degree a cam, the individual events will be slightly off. Although professional engine builders may measure it CL's, many will make their final adjustment by setting the intake closing event where they want it....as it's the most important of the four.
I hope this was helpful. Doing this can make a persons head hurt, but that's why we're trending toward individual events to give the greatest level of accuracy. Be the engine. Think.....like the engine.
#33
TECH Senior Member
Oh OK, I got in trouble because of the way the numbers got rounded. Thanks for clarifying!
#36
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes
on
618 Posts
#37
TECH Senior Member
You don't have to disclose who IS grinding your cams, but you CAN say who is NOT. And by saying Comp is NOT grinding your cams will have a lot of guys around here breathing a lot easier...
#38
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes
on
618 Posts
Only so many people grinding cams in the USA, so we can neither confirm nor deny. The graph at the end of the manufacturers article showing the Pro LS vs. average is easily confirmed though and should set people at ease.
#39
TECH Senior Member
TSP, Cam Motion, Comp... and Isky. Maybe a few others....
#40
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
I recently talked to an engine builder who worked for a major manufacturer race team. He was a big fan of Comp cams. He was somewhat suspicious about the quality of another cam manufacturer. I'm not saying his opinion is correct in either case but it was interesting to talk to him.
I've seen cases where someone had a problem and the manufacturer stood behind their product and fixed the issue. I think that would be the case with Summit.
I've seen cases where someone had a problem and the manufacturer stood behind their product and fixed the issue. I think that would be the case with Summit.
Last edited by wannafbody; 09-25-2018 at 10:38 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Qdttracer9 (03-15-2021)