Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What oil pump for 7k, road race, and axle oil lifters?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2018, 03:10 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
bthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 347
Received 131 Likes on 94 Posts
Default What oil pump for 7k, road race, and axle oil lifters?

Trying to decide on which oil pump to run. Plan on turning up to 7k on my stroker motor, and have axle oiled lifters, but don’t want to suck the pan dry.

Pan is a c5 ls6 batwing that I have put the improved racing baffles in. I also opened up the passages behind the side baffles to get more oil in around the opposite baffle when cornering. Also will be using the improved racing crank scraper setup.


Will oil restricting pushrods be recomended in this application too?

Old 12-31-2018, 04:06 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bob570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 517
Received 216 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

I'm not an expert on this by any means, but the stock pumps have cavitation issues at high RPM. I went with the how high pressure Melling 10295, the high volume pump, the meeting 10296 is known to suck oil sumps dry.

I plan on getting a C5 and turning it into a track car eventually so I would also like to know some of this information. It might be a good idea to add an Accusump into the mix.
Old 01-01-2019, 03:27 AM
  #3  
TECH Resident
 
NSFW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 814
Received 117 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

I went with the Melling high-pressure pump on my C5. Not stock because of high rpm concerns, and not high-flow because I've heard too many stories of LS engines getting oil starvation under high rpm and long high-g turns. Gen 4 seems to be more prone to that than Gen 3, but still. Plus the high pressure should compensate for the added oil cooler.

I haven't tracked my C5 yet but I spent last summer getting it ready and will be taking it out the next chance I get. Can hardly wait...
Old 01-01-2019, 09:24 AM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

I would def do axle oiling lifters
Old 01-01-2019, 09:30 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
bthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 347
Received 131 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
I would def do axle oiling lifters
yep, already purchased johnson 2126lsr

planning on 3/8 pushrods as well
Old 01-01-2019, 09:41 AM
  #6  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bthomas
Trying to decide on which oil pump to run. Plan on turning up to 7k on my stroker motor, and have axle oiled lifters, but don’t want to suck the pan dry.

Pan is a c5 ls6 batwing that I have put the improved racing baffles in. I also opened up the passages behind the side baffles to get more oil in around the opposite baffle when cornering. Also will be using the improved racing crank scraper setup.


Will oil restricting pushrods be recomended in this application too?
Since you have a built stroker, the clearances may be looser than factory. When the mains and rods are over .002”, I like to use the 10296 to bring the pressure back up. I’ve heard the rumors, but I have yet to see anyone actually suck an oil pan dry.
Old 01-01-2019, 10:56 AM
  #7  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
pantera_efi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default 2010 Camaro OP + Valve Spring Cooling

Hi Thomas, I use a 2010 Camaro OP and port the pump/shim the pressure spring .060".

I "port" to Oil Pan in the area of the filter insert AND drill a new passageway in that area to "bypass" an amount of oil past the oil cooler.

UNDERSTAND the high engine RPM can "turn" your Valve Springs Blue from excess heat, thus top end oil flow is needed.

Your MB clearance should be .002" (AL Crankcase) with Rods @ 0035"

I would "overbalance" by 2%

Lance
Old 01-01-2019, 05:46 PM
  #8  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,319
Received 3,368 Likes on 2,085 Posts

Default

I always laugh when people hate on the 10296 pump. The increase in flow is 13%, which isn’t enough in my opinion to suck any pan dry, unless you either have a really small oddball pan, or you have an oil return problem, and your road racing your stuff. Your bearings will love you for the increased flow of oil. It helps cool them. And all a high pressure pump really does is eat horsepower. I run the 10296, ported by Tony.
I port my oil pans, like Lance describes, as well. The factory passage is small and leaves a lot of room to open up for oil flow. My Holley pans are the same way, and porting the passage works well on them also.
Old 01-01-2019, 08:28 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
NSFW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 814
Received 117 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

The only cars I know of that died from oil starvation in turns were on road courses when it happened. I wouldn't worry about it in a street car or drag racer.

I have habit of breaking stuff though, and road courses are the whole reason I bought my C5.
Old 01-01-2019, 09:15 PM
  #10  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,319
Received 3,368 Likes on 2,085 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NSFW
The only cars I know of that died from oil starvation in turns were on road courses when it happened. I wouldn't worry about it in a street car or drag racer.

I have habit of breaking stuff though, and road courses are the whole reason I bought my C5.
My opinion is if your road racing, you should look into a dry sump system. It’s tough to watch an oil pump gauge in the middle of a turn. Dry sump gives reliability and frees up some hp.
Old 01-01-2019, 09:27 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
bthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 347
Received 131 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle


My opinion is if your road racing, you should look into a dry sump system. It’s tough to watch an oil pump gauge in the middle of a turn. Dry sump gives reliability and frees up some hp.
I agree, but a dry sump setup isn’t in the cards after my engine rebuild killed my finances for a while. Plan is to do the best I can with what I have. As far as what I’m reading the ls6 batwing does pretty well though
Old 01-02-2019, 01:13 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
NSFW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 814
Received 117 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

I've been following the Spec Corvette guys to see how they do. So far it seems like Gen 3 motors on 200 treadwear tires with no aero aren't really in great danger. Most of them aren't even running baffles in the oil pan. So I'm going to hold off on a dry sump until/unless I get a Gen 4 motor, slicks, or aero. None of which are likely in the next couple/few years.

Meanwhile there's a thread over at CorvetteForum asking who hasn't blown their Gen 4 on a road course and it really does sound like dry sumps are the only way to go with those.
Old 01-02-2019, 06:30 AM
  #13  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,319
Received 3,368 Likes on 2,085 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NSFW
I've been following the Spec Corvette guys to see how they do. So far it seems like Gen 3 motors on 200 treadwear tires with no aero aren't really in great danger. Most of them aren't even running baffles in the oil pan. So I'm going to hold off on a dry sump until/unless I get a Gen 4 motor, slicks, or aero. None of which are likely in the next couple/few years.

Meanwhile there's a thread over at CorvetteForum asking who hasn't blown their Gen 4 on a road course and it really does sound like dry sumps are the only way to go with those.
The only difference in the oiling system I’m aware of between the ge3/ge4 engines is the towers in the valley for DOD, which I can’t see what that would have to do with anything. Maybe a pan change? I enjoy CorvetteForum, because I’ve owned a couple, but the “I blew my LS7 up today” threads are getting old.
Old 01-02-2019, 10:05 AM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
bthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 347
Received 131 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pantera_efi
Hi Thomas, I use a 2010 Camaro OP and port the pump/shim the pressure spring .060".

I "port" to Oil Pan in the area of the filter insert AND drill a new passageway in that area to "bypass" an amount of oil past the oil cooler.

UNDERSTAND the high engine RPM can "turn" your Valve Springs Blue from excess heat, thus top end oil flow is needed.

Your MB clearance should be .002" (AL Crankcase) with Rods @ 0035"

I would "overbalance" by 2%

Lance

I’m using a thermostatic adapter to my oil cooler, I was under the impression this drill mod wasn’t a priority since my cooler won’t be full flow the majority of the time anyway.
Old 01-02-2019, 05:37 PM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Lance and Scott, do y'all have pictures of the porting you do on the oil pan oil passage for the return oil?

I don't know if it's a thing with cars but when I used to do long distance stand up wheelies on bikes I would burn up the motor from starving it for oil and adding a quart or so would keep it from doing it. Has anyone tried this with road racing? I know it's not ideal, but neither is burning up a motor.
Old 01-02-2019, 05:55 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
bthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 347
Received 131 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Lance and Scott, do y'all have pictures of the porting you do on the oil pan oil passage for the return oil?

I don't know if it's a thing with cars but when I used to do long distance stand up wheelies on bikes I would burn up the motor from starving it for oil and adding a quart or so would keep it from doing it. Has anyone tried this with road racing? I know it's not ideal, but neither is burning up a motor.
very common to add a qt to the pan on track cars
Old 01-02-2019, 06:18 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
rednari2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 389
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bthomas


very common to add a qt to the pan on track cars
Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Lance and Scott, do y'all have pictures of the porting you do on the oil pan oil passage for the return oil?

I don't know if it's a thing with cars but when I used to do long distance stand up wheelies on bikes I would burn up the motor from starving it for oil and adding a quart or so would keep it from doing it. Has anyone tried this with road racing? I know it's not ideal, but neither is burning up a motor.
Very common to add a quart over. I do it on my LS6 at all times. Its in a GTO which has a front sump and I circuit and oval race it. I never had a problem, but would also like to see pics of the mod. Lance where are you??

The LS6 is a better set up for road racing. The head and block design allows the oil to flow back to the sump quicker. The hot set up for road racing a 6, is to uncap the rear head vents, set #7 ring gap at .0018 if doing the motor, and add baffles and a crank scraper.

The OP has a C5, but unless I missed it, didn't state if it was a 6 or a 1. The Ls6 motors are good racers with adequate oil return and a light valve train. I have no personal experience with LS3s, but I understand that the head design isn't as good for oil return. The LS6 oil pump is also adequate, but I found it interesting that Lance would recommend a 4h gen Camaro pump. Must be some special quirk to it.
Old 01-02-2019, 07:36 PM
  #18  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,319
Received 3,368 Likes on 2,085 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Lance and Scott, do y'all have pictures of the porting you do on the oil pan oil passage for the return oil?

I don't know if it's a thing with cars but when I used to do long distance stand up wheelies on bikes I would burn up the motor from starving it for oil and adding a quart or so would keep it from doing it. Has anyone tried this with road racing? I know it's not ideal, but neither is burning up a motor.
Pooter, I’ll see if I can find something. If not, I’ll take pics of the one I’m doing right now.
yes, very common to add a quart of oil to ls road race engines. I love wheelies!!!!
Old 01-02-2019, 08:42 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,309
Received 857 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rednari2
Very common to add a quart over. I do it on my LS6 at all times. Its in a GTO which has a front sump and I circuit and oval race it. I never had a problem, but would also like to see pics of the mod. Lance where are you??

The LS6 is a better set up for road racing. The head and block design allows the oil to flow back to the sump quicker. The hot set up for road racing a 6, is to uncap the rear head vents, set #7 ring gap at .0018 if doing the motor, and add baffles and a crank scraper.

The OP has a C5, but unless I missed it, didn't state if it was a 6 or a 1. The Ls6 motors are good racers with adequate oil return and a light valve train. I have no personal experience with LS3s, but I understand that the head design isn't as good for oil return. The LS6 oil pump is also adequate, but I found it interesting that Lance would recommend a 4h gen Camaro pump. Must be some special quirk to it.

I'm not for sure but I think the L99's use a different oil pump since it has the DOD/AFM. My "guess" is that pump flows more to support that but it's just a guess.
Old 01-02-2019, 11:45 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
 
NSFW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 814
Received 117 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

The most promising theory I know of for the Gen 4 oil starvation issue is that the oil doesn't drain back from the heads fast enough. Restricted pushrods allegedly help somewhat, and one guy even put AN fittings into his heads so he could run hoses to the pan, but I don't think I saw how that turned out.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.