Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

6.0 LS3 heads, Considering new truck cam, suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2019, 10:46 AM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Cam Motion should answer this but until then, consider this one from them- LS3 Stage I Camshaft: 212/222, 116 LSA, .553/.553. I think this will work because of the LS3 heads you are using, which like more duration split than cathedrals. It should idle very smooth (-15 degrees overlap) and give a lot more torque and horsepower throughout the range.
Old 02-26-2019, 12:24 PM
  #22  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
speedmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks again G Atsma, very sound suggestion there, and im definitely considering that cam as a possibility. I was just interested to see if they would also render an opinion and back it up with a bit of reasoning. thanks everyone for all the info so far, im very pleased with the reaction this thread has gotten.
Old 02-26-2019, 12:48 PM
  #23  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
CAMMOTION PERF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 507
Received 106 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedmachine
hey Cam Motion! do you have a suggestion on which of your truck cams youd choose for a LS3 headed stock 6.0L in a heavy truck [stock converter]?
truck sees limited use now, occasionally tows, 90% highway driving on asphalt %10 pulling out stuck friends, and off-roading.
ive lost my taste for lumpy idles, don't care what it sounds like now as long as there is lots of low and midrange torque.
Yes! For your application, I highly recommend our Stage 1 High-lift version:
http://www.cammotion.com/camshafts/6...204-212-116-4/

This camshaft will be a very nice horsepower upgrade while still maintaining the off-idle and low speed torque needed for towing.
__________________


The Switch Is On To Cam Motion!
40 years of Championship Winning Experience • Superior 8620 Steel Camshaft Cores • Quiet, Smooth & Powerful Lobe Design • Virtually Unlimited Lift and Duration Combinations • Finish Polished For Quiet Operation • Cam Doctor Printout With All Cams
The Industry's Best Customer Service

www.CamMotion.com ☎ 225-926-6110Like Us On Facebook!
Old 02-26-2019, 12:48 PM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedmachine
thanks again G Atsma, very sound suggestion there, and im definitely considering that cam as a possibility. I was just interested to see if they would also render an opinion and back it up with a bit of reasoning. thanks everyone for all the info so far, im very pleased with the reaction this thread has gotten.
Whoa. I just realized this is the same thread that I recommended the same cam in before! LOL Sorry for the repetition! Memory fart...
Plus it looks like Cam Motion recommends an even milder version which should still do what you want.
Old 03-08-2019, 10:37 PM
  #25  
Teching In
 
kylemilligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Summit, I have been all over various forums creeping for information on your smaller 8718 and 8719 cams. I've been on the fence between the two for my 6.0 swap z71. Some of Summit's posts insinuates these cams were developed in house on dynos. Could we see some dyno graphs verses an lq9/ls1 or similar cam to see where the gains are in the rpm range? Please??
Old 03-08-2019, 11:04 PM
  #26  
Teching In
 
kylemilligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 6.0 swap 2001 1500 z71 is the racecar hauler. 10.3CR, 799 heads, longtube headers, no cats, low restriction inlet and exhaust. No need for high rpm hp or hp past the peak. It needs to make peak hp at 5500-5800 and be done before 6000 for the shift. No need for extra exhaust duration to make it carry hp over 6000. I would like ALL the torque possible between 3000 and 5500.
Old 03-08-2019, 11:12 PM
  #27  
Teching In
 
kylemilligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Really leaning towards a custom Cam Motion cam now. Thinking a 216/216 on a 108lsa 104 icl would be about right.
Old 03-08-2019, 11:29 PM
  #28  
Teching In
 
kylemilligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Summit, yall have talked the talk. How bout some dyno numbers. We all can make the perfect calculator cam without testing.
Old 03-08-2019, 11:56 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
 
andy burdess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Iowa
Posts: 104
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kylemilligan
Summit, yall have talked the talk. How bout some dyno numbers. We all can make the perfect calculator cam without testing.
I don’t think you can go wrong with the summit cam for the price. Worst case pull it and try another one. With out them trying your particular engine build a dyno won’t be an accurate test for you. I can assure you each of their cams has an accurate description of rpm range so you know what you’ll get. Towing a car hauler id recommend the 8718. I’ve tuned in the stage 2 truck cam as well which is a fun cam that allows a healthy mid and very strong top end but probably wouldn’t be best for a towing application. It’s a somewhat healthy cam. My setup is somewhat similar to yours with 10:5:1 compression ratio and 862 heads on 6.0. Just pull the trigger man you won’t regret it.
Old 03-09-2019, 12:09 AM
  #30  
Teching In
 
kylemilligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry, I'm not digging the summit half truths of camshaft development, in house dynos, then waiting for customer dyno number results to quote.
Old 03-09-2019, 12:56 AM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kylemilligan
Sorry, I'm not digging the summit half truths of camshaft development, in house dynos, then waiting for customer dyno number results to quote.
Summit worked VERY closely with a major LS-specialized cam grinder (I suspect either TSP or Cam Motion but nobody's talking) for their cams. I haven't seen any half-truths anywhere in the descriptive print concerning these cams.
Old 03-09-2019, 08:40 AM
  #32  
On The Tree
 
andy burdess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Iowa
Posts: 104
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kylemilligan
Sorry, I'm not digging the summit half truths of camshaft development, in house dynos, then waiting for customer dyno number results to quote.
would seeing an overall number like say 40 horsepower make you happy? With the truck it’s a little more about useable power throughout the curve. I don’t think many companies post dyno graphs for truck cams but i could be wrong. At least I didn’t see any in my research. I compared specs and emailed a few companies with questions and even asked for a dyno graph from crane and was told that they don’t provide that info. I settled on summit for the price and all the info they posted up about it and they always seem to chime in here if anyone has questions. A few buddies and I were looking into renting a dyno for a Saturday morning sometime if we end up doing it I’ll post up the graph. Also one of their cams a friend installed I believe it was the 8701 underneath the summit sticker there was an elgin one.
Old 03-09-2019, 03:07 PM
  #33  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kylemilligan
Summit, I have been all over various forums creeping for information on your smaller 8718 and 8719 cams. I've been on the fence between the two for my 6.0 swap z71. Some of Summit's posts insinuates these cams were developed in house on dynos. Could we see some dyno graphs verses an lq9/ls1 or similar cam to see where the gains are in the rpm range? Please??

Did you sign up here just to troll Summit?

Rhetorical question btw
Old 03-09-2019, 03:23 PM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Did you sign up here just to troll Summit?

Rhetorical question btw
One might get that impression..... LOL
Old 03-09-2019, 03:35 PM
  #35  
Teching In
 
kylemilligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually, if information was available in a format such as this......
​​​​​​​
​​​​​​https://markenperformance.com/n-8673-crane-cams-direct-fit-cams-for-ls-stock-oe-valve-trains-4-8l-to-6l.html

.....I would buy a summit cam right now.
Old 03-09-2019, 04:15 PM
  #36  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kylemilligan
Actually, if information was available in a format such as this......
​​​​​​​
​​​​​​https://markenperformance.com/n-8673...-8l-to-6l.html

.....I would buy a summit cam right now.
Too bad that's not clickable.... but it is now.....
BTW Crane didn't have those dyno tests until a while after their cams came out. Summit's cams are fairly new yet.
Also, those tests don't indicate whether the test engines were Gen III (small heads) or Gen IV (243/799 heads). BIG difference there, and different cam conditions.
Old 03-09-2019, 07:49 PM
  #37  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes on 618 Posts

Default

Hello there. The lobes were developed by a designer of over twenty years. Valve event timing was determined by our own experienced team based on several years of data on multiple platforms on a chasssis dyno. We have employees running them to in their own vehicles.

We have two engine dynos, but Chassis dyno numbers from third parties (our customers) is what people trust and relate to anyway. The cams will do the talking for us.

Kyle brings up a good point though. These came out on Independence Day and we heavily encourage customers who've installed and ran them to leave reviews (holding the parts in their hands, power, times, driveability). It helps other customers form their own decisions.

Last edited by Summitracing; 03-09-2019 at 08:13 PM.
Old 03-10-2019, 01:04 AM
  #38  
On The Tree
 
andy burdess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Iowa
Posts: 104
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Ok the crane camshaft with similar specs sells for 400 bucks. Summit stage 1 is 259. My experience with them as a professional mechanic and a mildly experienced tuner has been great. At nearly half the price of their competition it’s a no brainer in my opinion. Hopefully I can post dyno info soon.

Last edited by andy burdess; 03-10-2019 at 10:10 AM.
Old 03-11-2019, 09:53 AM
  #39  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 1,951
Received 1,121 Likes on 618 Posts

Default

You'll be happy with them Andy. It's important to remember that the reason we can price them where we do is because of the run size volumes we do. You're getting a ton of quality (better in most cases) than cams that sell for over $100 more.
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
Old 03-11-2019, 09:56 AM
  #40  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kylemilligan
My 6.0 swap 2001 1500 z71 is the racecar hauler. 10.3CR, 799 heads, longtube headers, no cats, low restriction inlet and exhaust. No need for high rpm hp or hp past the peak. It needs to make peak hp at 5500-5800 and be done before 6000 for the shift. No need for extra exhaust duration to make it carry hp over 6000. I would like ALL the torque possible between 3000 and 5500.
You might want a reverse split. Something like 224/218-110+2 and 1-3/4 long tubes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.