Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best cam for an LS1 with 241 heads.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2023, 10:10 AM
  #21  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
blackdak318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 450
Received 73 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
Cam Motion Titan 4 is a similar spec cam. Good midrange torque. Summit Ghost Cam is slightly smaller option.
I agree that something in this range is a very solid all around cam for a 346" LS1/6. Brian Tooley himself spec'd me a 227/235 for the LS6 in my C5Z with some CNC heads right after he left TEA. He told me it was one of if not the first cams he sold out on his own and the start of BTR. I'm pretty sure they still have a shelf cam that is nearly identical. It made 448 rwhp on my set up on a stingy mustang dyno and drove great.
Old 12-10-2023, 11:46 AM
  #22  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,764
Received 852 Likes on 653 Posts

Default

The original BTR stage 2 was a 227/234. Works great for a street driven car.
The following users liked this post:
blackdak318 (12-12-2023)
Old 12-12-2023, 09:25 AM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,804
Received 201 Likes on 142 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stockA4
I really think the LS6 PowerMax 204/222 .551/.570 112+1 would break your brain if you tried it, my 6.2L could have turned the earth with it when I had it in there. What's your static compression ratio again man?
I put this cam in my 2000 GMC Yukon 4wd with a 5.3. On a mustang dyno the truck made 239whp/269wtq stock with Efans in 2nd gear. After adding Powermax cam, TBSS manifold w/ 92mm tb, 1 3/4 headers, Circle D 2600 converter, it made 322whp 313wtq. Makes more torque than stock from 2500rpm on up, power peaks at 5900 and carries flat out to 6500rpm. Easy to tune, drives as good as stock, valve train is silent. Nice little cam imo.

However I would probably do the Powermax plus if I was going to put a cam in a light car with a LS1. A 220/222 should be easy to tune and still drive really nice. I ran a 224/228 112 in my LS1 and it worked well. I say go milder on the cam, spend the money on good heads, intake, and exhaust. That is where the power is at. The cam is just going to move the power band around and start to give up drivability once you get above 3-5 degrees of overlap in trade for more peak power.
The following 3 users liked this post by kinglt-1:
blackdak318 (12-12-2023), CGumina (12-12-2023), Pulse Red (12-13-2023)
Old 12-13-2023, 09:26 AM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
 
stockA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,114
Received 323 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=kinglt-1;20533148]I put this cam in my 2000 GMC Yukon 4wd with a 5.3. On a mustang dyno the truck made 239whp/269wtq stock with Efans in 2nd gear. After adding Powermax cam, TBSS manifold w/ 92mm tb, 1 3/4 headers, Circle D 2600 converter, it made 322whp 313wtq. Makes more torque than stock from 2500rpm on up, power peaks at 5900 and carries flat out to 6500rpm. Easy to tune, drives as good as stock, valve train is silent. Nice little cam imo.

Yep, mine powermax ended up in the 5.3 in my 2004 suburban with stock diameter tires, converter, but I've got the factory 4.10 gears in mine. It's a beater, I get it dirty so no fancy intake or headers for me, However, I did put 4.8 flat tops in when I put it together. I had a BTR stage 3 truck cam in it at first 218/224 113+3 and it absolutely hauled, screamed on the highway low end hit wasn't even that bad. I think the flat tops and 4.10 help a little bit. I swapped it out for the PowerMax and it's a real monster now everywhere more power now Perfect cam for a heavier app
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (12-13-2023)



Quick Reply: Best cam for an LS1 with 241 heads.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 PM.