all this talk about valvesprings and lift...
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Swainsboro GA
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all this talk about valvesprings and lift...
How about spring pressure. Yea, comp 918's seem to take a lot of lift, but they have lower spring pressures too. Is the SPRING PRESSURE of the 918's high enough to controll an XER lobe? What is the least amount of spring pressure (on the seat and open) an XER lobe needs to be able to controll the valvetrain and keep the lifters planted on the cam?
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
comp sells their xer cams with 918 springs, so yah they should work just fine
http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Cu...ML/200-203.asp
the "premium" or recommended choice for the vavletrain is 918's, titanium retainers, and hardened pushrods...
you will be fine...
http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Cu...ML/200-203.asp
the "premium" or recommended choice for the vavletrain is 918's, titanium retainers, and hardened pushrods...
you will be fine...
#4
TECH Senior Member
224/220 .581 XE-R lobes here, running 918's and they run perfect. i'm a big fan of the lighter the valvetrain (while keeping within cam requirement parameters), the better.
My moving assembly per intake valve is 127 gr, too bad Tit. valves are so expensive otherwise i could achieve 98gr/int. valve
My moving assembly per intake valve is 127 gr, too bad Tit. valves are so expensive otherwise i could achieve 98gr/int. valve
#6
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
less spring pressure as compared to what? 130 on the seat @ 1.800 is more then any single 1.250" spring that i know of.
1. Comp 918’s:
Outside Diameter (O.D.): 1.290"/1.060"
Inside Diameter (I.D.): .885"/.656"
Installed Pressure: 130 lbs @ 1.800"
Open Pressure: 318 lbs @ 1.200''
Coil Bind: 1.085"
Maximum Lift: 0.625"
Rate (lbs/in): 313 lbs/in
3. Crane Duals:
The installed seat pressure is 112 lbs @ 1.800'' with a maximum recommended lift of .650'' at the valve with an accompanying open pressure of 352 lbs. The 1.275'' O.D.
112lbs @ 1.800
352lbs @ 1.150
will handle .650 lift with .045 coil clearance
4. Comp 921’s:
O.D: 1.300
I.D: .870 (outer spring)
I.D: .655 (inner spring)
135 LBS @ 1.770
400 LBS @ 1.220
COIL BIND @ 1.040
MAX LIFT .650
5. Patriot Gold Duals:
O.D 1.29
135lbs @ 1.800
385lbs open
coil bind @ 1.08
.650 lift
My Personal Indepedently tested PP golds:
seat: 143 lbs @ 1.800
open: 363 @ 1.200
coil bind: 1.060
Clearance: .140
spring rate: 367
6. PRC Dual Spring Kit:
seat : 140lbs
open: 390lbs
install : 1.800
coil bind: 1.07
1.290 O.D.
max lift : .660
matl : super pure chrome silicone
1. Comp 918’s:
Outside Diameter (O.D.): 1.290"/1.060"
Inside Diameter (I.D.): .885"/.656"
Installed Pressure: 130 lbs @ 1.800"
Open Pressure: 318 lbs @ 1.200''
Coil Bind: 1.085"
Maximum Lift: 0.625"
Rate (lbs/in): 313 lbs/in
3. Crane Duals:
The installed seat pressure is 112 lbs @ 1.800'' with a maximum recommended lift of .650'' at the valve with an accompanying open pressure of 352 lbs. The 1.275'' O.D.
112lbs @ 1.800
352lbs @ 1.150
will handle .650 lift with .045 coil clearance
4. Comp 921’s:
O.D: 1.300
I.D: .870 (outer spring)
I.D: .655 (inner spring)
135 LBS @ 1.770
400 LBS @ 1.220
COIL BIND @ 1.040
MAX LIFT .650
5. Patriot Gold Duals:
O.D 1.29
135lbs @ 1.800
385lbs open
coil bind @ 1.08
.650 lift
My Personal Indepedently tested PP golds:
seat: 143 lbs @ 1.800
open: 363 @ 1.200
coil bind: 1.060
Clearance: .140
spring rate: 367
6. PRC Dual Spring Kit:
seat : 140lbs
open: 390lbs
install : 1.800
coil bind: 1.07
1.290 O.D.
max lift : .660
matl : super pure chrome silicone
Trending Topics
#11
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by BrentB@TEA
I am not a fan of the 918 spring. I prefer the "gold" spring used by TEA,PRC and Patriot.
It is for a "reverse" cam.
You guys would do that, wouldn't you ??
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mount Dora, Fla
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the 918 is a great spring, however I'm more comfortable with a dual over say .550-.560 lift. This is not to say that the 918's can't take a much higher lift, psychologically I feel better with duals.
#15
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Swainsboro GA
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jrp, I was comparing the 918's to the patriot dual springs. Thank all of you for the information, but I really dont want to hear (918's will be enough). I could have hit the search button and found that. If 918's didnt exist, and I bought a cam with xer lobes whether it would be comp, tr, futral, crane, etc. What are the minimum pressures that I would be able to run with a cam with aggressive lobes like that? Closed pressure on the seat? open pressure?
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by jrp
less spring pressure as compared to what? 130 on the seat @ 1.800 is more then any single 1.250" spring that i know of.
There is one. It was developed for Clay Smith a few years back for Circle track engines that have rules that limit spring OD to 1.250". So Pioneer developed a spring that is 145# to 150# on the seat at 1.800" install. This is a single with a damper. Several companies now market it.
Chris
#17
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
Originally Posted by Cstraub
JRP,
There is one. It was developed for Clay Smith a few years back for Circle track engines that have rules that limit spring OD to 1.250". So Pioneer developed a spring that is 145# to 150# on the seat at 1.800" install. This is a single with a damper. Several companies now market it.
Chris
There is one. It was developed for Clay Smith a few years back for Circle track engines that have rules that limit spring OD to 1.250". So Pioneer developed a spring that is 145# to 150# on the seat at 1.800" install. This is a single with a damper. Several companies now market it.
Chris
#18
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
i'm a big fan of the lighter the valvetrain (while keeping within cam requirement parameters), the better.
My moving assembly per intake valve is 127 gr, too bad Tit. valves are so expensive otherwise i could achieve 98gr/int. valve
My moving assembly per intake valve is 127 gr, too bad Tit. valves are so expensive otherwise i could achieve 98gr/int. valve