Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AFR small bore 225s vs AFR 205s on a 346.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2006, 07:00 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
offaxis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: L-Town N.Y.
Posts: 2,062
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Any track times on the old 205 combo?

Id like to see what the track gains are.
Old 02-05-2006, 07:00 PM
  #22  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
1QuickT-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice comparison Patrick! I'm anxious to see how this thread ends up. I'm quite sure that you will get the power you are hunting for out of the 225's.. Its hard to beat the AFR heads and/or Tony M's service.
Old 02-05-2006, 08:57 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
 
Mr 35th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Carencro, LA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Patrick. I am sure you will get those numbers your looking far. It was nice talking with you again at Thunder the other day. Good luck on the new setup.
Old 02-05-2006, 09:04 PM
  #24  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mr 35th
Hey Patrick. I am sure you will get those numbers your looking far. It was nice talking with you again at Thunder the other day. Good luck on the new setup.
Thanks Sean. Good seeing you again. Glad to hear your car is faster than ever. The guys at Thunder Racing kick ***!
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 02-05-2006, 09:45 PM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Hey Patrick, Congrats on getting the swap done. Are you tuning right now in race trim or street trim?
Old 02-05-2006, 10:17 PM
  #26  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
Hey Patrick, Congrats on getting the swap done. Are you tuning right now in race trim or street trim?
Thanks Joel. I'm tuning in street trim right now. That's how I did it with the 205s, that's how I'm doing it with the 225s. I spent a good part of the day today logging lots of WOT runs (6800 rpm in 3rd gear on the street is 113mph!). My VE tables are looking smoother and my A/F ratio is much more linear. PE multiplier is set at 1.13 for all rpm. With a little more fine tuning, I hope to get back to another chassis dyno. Too bad Thunder Racing's a 7 hour drive. Gotta go to a closer dyno next time. Hopefully, I'll get to go to the same shop in Houston where I pulled my 487rwhp Dynojet number. That would be good for an apples to apples comparison.
Old 02-06-2006, 10:32 AM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
SlickVert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
I'm running stock lifters and rockers. The springs are AFR 8019s. These springs are a little bit beefier than the awesome Comp 918s. AFR had these springs made for them exclusively and they rock. My valvetrain is actually quieter now. There is absolutely no valve float. I did not revise the FAST intake runners since the entry to the 205s vs the 225s are very close.
Yea the AFR 8019 look to be a great spring upgrade, great spring pressure.
When you refer to 918 in the above post, did you mean to say 921’s?

How did the AFR 225's HP and TQ curves look compared to the 205 between 5,000 and your max RPM?
Good luck with the fine tuning
Bob
Old 02-06-2006, 10:48 AM
  #28  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SlickVert
Yea the AFR 8019 look to be a great spring upgrade, great spring pressure.
When you refer to 918 in the above post, did you mean to say 921’s?

How did the AFR 225's HP and TQ curves look compared to the 205 between 5,000 and your max RPM?
Good luck with the fine tuning
Bob
Oops, yes I meant 921s, not 918s. Thanks, I edited my previous post.

The HP and Tq curves between the 205s and the 225s are overlays of each other up to about 4000 rpm. After that, the 225s gain both power and torque and by 4800, there is a 5rwhp/5rwtq advantage that stayed for the rest of the dyno. After doing more SD tuning over the weekend, I've discovered more areas to improve fuel delivery. Basically, the VE tables are a reflection of the power potential of the motor. Since the VE tables for the 225s are raised quite a bit over the 205s, it looks like there's around a 15-18 rwhp gain in there. I hope to re-dyno very soon.
Old 02-06-2006, 11:25 AM
  #29  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How far are you from Houston, Patrick?
Old 02-06-2006, 01:26 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Patrick,
Here is a quote from EngineMasters magazine. "You've discovered an inordinate amount of fuel is required to optimize power. The possibility exists that excessive mechanical seperation of air and fuel is the cause, requiring additional fuel to compensate for unburned and seperated fuel passing directly out of the exhaust ports. Such cases often require additional spark timing too, both conditions are undesirable".

Maybe your new 225's have a lower level of mixing the air/fuel mixture properly in the standerd small bore 347 engine compaired to the better matched 205's.

Last edited by gollum; 02-06-2006 at 01:35 PM.
Old 02-06-2006, 02:35 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
STRIPSTAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phila, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gollum
Patrick,
Here is a quote from EngineMasters magazine. "You've discovered an inordinate amount of fuel is required to optimize power. The possibility exists that excessive mechanical seperation of air and fuel is the cause, requiring additional fuel to compensate for unburned and seperated fuel passing directly out of the exhaust ports. Such cases often require additional spark timing too, both conditions are undesirable".

Maybe your new 225's have a lower level of mixing the air/fuel mixture properly in the standerd small bore 347 engine compaired to the better matched 205's.
Hmm, interesting quote but why the less fuel down low?
Old 02-06-2006, 02:37 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
STRIPSTAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phila, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Louie83
Interesting experiment, I'll keep an eye on this one.

The only problem I see is that your cam is matched to the 205's and I don't think that cam is capable of showing the full potential of 225's. I would think something in the mid 240's matched to the 225 would be more ideal, especially in the upper RPM's.
I dont agree. That cam is plenty for stock bore.
Old 02-06-2006, 02:43 PM
  #33  
TECH Apprentice
 
Big-DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How are those flow #'s with the FAST intake manifold attached?
Old 02-06-2006, 02:46 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

On a race engine, signs of SHINEY clean washed areas on piston tops and combustion chambers is a dead giveaway of severe air/fuel seperation.

If air/fuel mixture is correct you should have an even coat of carbon build up with some variations in color in the combustion area (very very small area of washed shiney area is acceptable).

Last edited by gollum; 02-06-2006 at 03:05 PM.
Old 02-06-2006, 02:56 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by STRIPSTAR
Hmm, interesting quote but why the less fuel down low?
Just a thought. The visual carbon inspection may be flawd because of the low rpm driving range our street cars encounter most of the time. But air/fuel seperation may still be occuring where power is needed most "up high". Will the shiney areas still show up on our street driven cars if seperation occurs?

Last edited by gollum; 02-07-2006 at 04:24 AM.
Old 02-06-2006, 04:25 PM
  #36  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

interested to see how you end up with these. keep us updated on the new power
Old 02-06-2006, 05:03 PM
  #37  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ben R
How far are you from Houston, Patrick?
I'm 1.5 hours from Sugarland and 2 hours from the middle of Houston.
Old 02-06-2006, 05:16 PM
  #38  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
98Aggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mission Valley, TX
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey Patrick, I will she if John will give us a good deal to use his mustang dyno here in Victoria.
Old 02-06-2006, 05:32 PM
  #39  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98Aggie
Hey Patrick, I will she if John will give us a good deal to use his mustang dyno here in Victoria.
Thanks Kurt. I was going to call you and see if that would be possible. Although the numbers would be lower, we'd be able to super-tune the car better on a Mustang Dyno, then punch a big number on somebody's DJ in Houston after it's done. Call me at home if you find out something.
Old 02-06-2006, 08:12 PM
  #40  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
rufretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting thread. I'll give another vote for track results once the tuning is done. Good luck with the tune.


Quick Reply: AFR small bore 225s vs AFR 205s on a 346.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.